ProCon October 2009 Convention in Indianapolis (Voting on Platform)

[Associate Justice PiT]

We should wait on a official endorsement for the Mideast, I agree with the previous opinions.

    Midwest, actually. I think we have a pretty good candidate in the Mideast already.

[Alexander Hamilton]

RPP must endorse the RPP Midwester

No we don't have to.

Yes you do, unless the RPP bylaws have been changed.

Not if there is another RPP candidate

[Sewer]

RPP must endorse the RPP Midwester

No we don't have to.

Yes you do, unless the RPP bylaws have been changed.

Not if there is another RPP candidate

Thars not.

[Alexander Hamilton]

RPP must endorse the RPP Midwester

No we don't have to.

Yes you do, unless the RPP bylaws have been changed.

Not if there is another RPP candidate

Thars not.

Yet

[Psychic Octopus]

We should wait on a official endorsement for the Mideast, I agree with the previous opinions.

    Midwest, actually. I think we have a pretty good candidate in the Mideast already.

Sorry, gaffe.

[Sewer]

Mechman is in favor of gay bestiality.

[Associate Justice PiT]

RPP must endorse the RPP Midwester

No we don't have to.

Yes you do, unless the RPP bylaws have been changed.

     The RPP bylaws just say this:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

     Interestingly, this isn't being held on the private forum. Perhaps that bylaw should be amended to strike the word "private".

     Also there is a very good chance that there will soon be another RPPer in the race, so even if we had to endorse a member of our party that runs if there is one, that would be moot in this case.

[Psychic Octopus]

Mechman is in favor of gay bestiality.

Source?

[Хahar 🤔]

PiT forfeited that position when he left the RPP.

Thanks but I think we know who our vice-chair is better than yours, run away little boy and go hack someone else

In other words, he remained Vice-Chairman even when he was in the DA? Interesting.

We were retained as vice-chairman after returning to the party.

Wouldn't you need a vote for that?

[Alexander Hamilton]

PiT forfeited that position when he left the RPP.

Thanks but I think we know who our vice-chair is better than yours, run away little boy and go hack someone else

In other words, he remained Vice-Chairman even when he was in the DA? Interesting.

We were retained as vice-chairman after returning to the party.

Wouldn't you need a vote for that?

no ,  go away

[Alexander Hamilton]

Motion to remove RowanBrandon using the Party Empowerment Act

[Sewer]

Motion to remove Alexander Hamilton using the Party Empowerment Act

[Alexander Hamilton]

Motion to remove Alexander Hamilton using the Party Empowerment Act

Abstain

[Rowan]

Motion to remove RowanBrandon using the Party Empowerment Act

Actually the party leaders support the move.

[Alexander Hamilton]

Motion to remove RowanBrandon using the Party Empowerment Act

Actually the party leaders support the move.

You obviously are making a mistake

[Associate Justice PiT]

     I am fairly ambivalent about this move. I am however curious about the ramifications of this on the December elections.

     You see, we have already had two members express interest in being candidates. One of them has a good chance at gaining office before then, but if he fails to do so, are we just going to bump one of the two potential candidates off to support RowanBrandon's re-election? I think that would be a mistake, but I'm interested to hear other opinions on the matter.

[Alexander Hamilton]

     I am fairly ambivalent about this move. I am however curious about the ramifications of this on the December elections.

     You see, we have already had two members express interest in being candidates. One of them has a good chance at gaining office before then, but if he fails to do so, are we just going to bump one of the two potential candidates off to support RowanBrandon's re-election? I think that would be a mistake, but I'm interested to hear other opinions on the matter.

I wouldn't stay in a party that endorsed Rowan and I also know for a fact that if Rowan is a candidate, only one candidate is needed because that is the best we can do. Swing voters will run for the hills (aka Franzl).

[Psychic Octopus]

I motion a renaming of the RPP to the Liberal Conservative Party.

[Sewer]

I motion a renaming of the RPP to the Liberal Conservative Party.

I second this.

[Alexander Hamilton]

I motion a renaming of the RPP to the Liberal Conservative Party.

I second this.

You can't second this.

[Sewer]

I motion a renaming of the RPP to the Liberal Conservative Party.

I second this.

You can't second this.

Why not?

[Alexander Hamilton]

I motion a renaming of the RPP to the Liberal Conservative Party.

I second this.

You can't second this.

Why not?

You aren't an RPPer.

[Sewer]

I motion a renaming of the RPP to the Liberal Conservative Party.

I second this.

You can't second this.

Why not?

You aren't an RPPer.

You aren't an RPPer.

[Associate Justice PiT]

     I am fairly ambivalent about this move. I am however curious about the ramifications of this on the December elections.

     You see, we have already had two members express interest in being candidates. One of them has a good chance at gaining office before then, but if he fails to do so, are we just going to bump one of the two potential candidates off to support RowanBrandon's re-election? I think that would be a mistake, but I'm interested to hear other opinions on the matter.

I wouldn't stay in a party that endorsed Rowan and I also know for a fact that if Rowan is a candidate, only one candidate is needed because that is the best we can do. Swing voters will run for the hills (aka Franzl).

     I understand. I would like to know what terms he was welcomed back under, though.

I motion a renaming of the RPP to the Liberal Conservative Party.

I second this.

     I third this.

[Rowan]

Liberal Conservative Party??