The Atlasian Supreme Court has overruled the CJO's decision to award damages for the strike. The exact import of the opinion is unclear because the first opinion wasn't good enough - probably not sufficiently pro-union to the leftists who wrote the majority opinion, one of which commented on the law as it was written and ought have recused himself.
I'm sorry for butting in here and I'm not going to speak about the decision itself.
However, if you think the court is dominated by the leftists, isn't it unwise to push forward in such a manner that would set forth what you'd probably find to be some very bad caselaw?
