Talk Elections
Forum
Contact
|
US Election Atlas
Election 2020
Election Results
Election Info
Atlas Wiki
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
March 06, 2021, 03:54:05 AM
Talk Elections
Atlas Fantasy Elections
Atlas Fantasy Government
Regional Governments
(Moderator:
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
)
Northeast Assembly Thread
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
3
[
4
]
5
6
7
8
9
...
239
Author
Topic: Northeast Assembly Thread (Read 336298 times)
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,518
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #75 on:
September 30, 2009, 02:30:36 PM »
«
edited:
September 30, 2009, 02:40:42 PM
by
cinyc »
Quote from: Mr. Moderate on September 30, 2009, 02:22:14 PM
No one answered or addressed my question the first time, so allow me to repeat it (with some rephrasing): Are citizens still able to propose legislation with signatories, or are we now just a mini-fed?
That's one of the two things I'm checking into - what the final amendment said on that and veto overrides. Both would need to be built into the queue somehow. I suspect we'd take up overrides immediately after a bill is vetoed, regardless of whether anything else is on the floor and we'd put citizen legislation to the top of the queue.
----------
Edit: 2 citizens may propose legislation for the Assembly to take up, as may the Governor. Both have to be added to the queue somehow. Proposal: Governor waits like everyone else, citizens get bills put to the top of the queue after current business is voted upon. We'd have to have separate procedures for amendments, since nothing would be friendly unless we let the Governor and/or those citizens participate when their legislation is on the floor.
On veto overrides, it appears that if we vote for a piece of legislation a second time, the Governor's veto is ineffective (See Article IV(xi)). That's not so great for the governor's powers, but I propose we take up veto overrides immediately simultaneously with any other legislation on the floor.
Logged
God-Empress Stacey I of House Abrams
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
Posts: 53,374
Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #76 on:
September 30, 2009, 02:56:15 PM »
Quote from: cinyc on September 30, 2009, 02:08:01 PM
Here's my first draft:
Standing Order on Assembly Procedure
1.
Proposed Legislation Thread
(a) The Lt. Governor shall open a new Northeast Assembly proposed legislation thread at the start of each Northeast Assembly term.
(b) Representatives shall post the full text of any proposed legislation in a response to the Northeast Assembly proposed legislation thread for the current term. Each response shall contain only one piece of proposed legislation.
(c) Nothing shall be posted to the Northeast Assembly proposed legislation thread except proposed legislation.
2.
Movement of Legislation to the Northeast Assembly Floor
(a) Except as provided in subsection (c), the Lt. Governor shall introduce legislation from the Northeast Assembly proposed legislation thread on the Northeast Assembly floor in chronological order, starting with the earliest piece of proposed legislation, except that the Lt. Governor shall not introduce more than two (2) pieces of legislation from the same Representative before introducing legislation from other Representatives that has been proposed before the date such third piece of proposed legislation would have otherwise been brought to the Northeast Assembly floor.
(b) Only one piece of legislation shall be placed on the Northeast Assembly floor at a time.
(c) Any Representative may make a motion to suspend section 2(a) of this Standing Order to move a piece proposed legislation to the top of the queue. The motion shall be immediately put to a vote on the Northeast Assembly floor. Such vote shall be open for 24 hours. If the motion passes by a vote of the majority of all Representatives (with abstentions and absences counted as nay votes), the Lt. Governor shall move such piece of proposed legislation to the Northeast Assembly floor immediately after any legislation then currently on the Northeast Assembly floor is voted upon or tabled.
3.
Legislative Debates and Voting
(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (h), all proposed legislation shall be open for debate until seventy-two (72) hours after the Lt. Governor introduces it to the Northeast Assembly floor.
(b) During debate, Representatives may suggest amendments to proposed legislation. If the sponsor of the proposed legislation publicly deems the amendment friendly, no vote on the amendment shall be required. If the sponsor of the proposed legislation does not publicly deem the amendment friendly, a vote on the amendment shall be taken at the end of the debate period.
(c) The sponsor of a proposed amendment may remove it from the Assembly floor by tabling it at any time before the end of the debate period.
(d) A vote will be held on all proposed amendments not deemed friendly at the end of the debate period. Such vote shall be open for twenty-four (24) hours. An amendment shall pass if a majority of Representatives vote in favor of it (with abstentions and absences not counted as votes).
(e) The sponsor of a piece of proposed legislation may remove it from the Assembly floor by tabling it at any time before a final vote is taken on the proposed legislation.
(f) A final vote the proposed legislation shall take place immediately after the Lt. Governor certifies the vote on any proposed amendments (or, if there are no such amendments, at the end of the debate period). Such vote shall be open for twenty-four (24) hours. A piece of proposed legislation shall pass if a majority of Representatives vote in favor of it (with abstentions and absences not counted as votes).
(g) The Lt. Governor shall certify the results of any vote within twenty-four (24) hours of the end of the voting period.
(h) Any Representative may make a motion to suspend sections 3(a), 3(d) or 3(f) of this Standing Order to increase or decrease the time of the debate or voting period. The motion shall be immediately put to a vote on the Northeast Assembly floor. Such vote shall be open for 24 hours. If the motion passes by a vote of the majority of all Representatives (with abstentions and absences counted as nay votes), the relevant period shall be changed.
4.
Terminology
(a) All legislation regarding the rules of the Northeast Assembly shall be called Standing Orders.
(b) All proposed legislation that requires the signature of the Governor shall be called a Bill until signed and thereafter an Act.
(c) The Lt. Governor shall maintain a public list of Standing Orders, unsuccessful bills actually voted upon, and Acts in the Atlasia Wiki for the Northeast, with a link to the text of such legislation.
Why should the Lieutenant Governor be the only one to officially introduce pieces of legislation ? This should be done by any representative whenever he wants.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,518
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #77 on:
September 30, 2009, 02:57:24 PM »
«
Edited:
September 30, 2009, 03:13:27 PM
by
cinyc »
Second Draft (new language in
red
)
Standing Order on Assembly Procedure
1.
Proposed Legislation Thread
(a) The Lt. Governor shall open a new Northeast Assembly proposed legislation thread at the start of each Northeast Assembly term.
(b) Representatives,
the Governor and any concerned Northeast citizen
shall post the full text of any proposed legislation in a response to the Northeast Assembly proposed legislation thread for the current term. Each response shall contain only one piece of proposed legislation.
(c) Nothing shall be posted to the Northeast Assembly proposed legislation thread except proposed legislation
or a Northeast citizen's signature for proposed citizen legislation
.
2.
Movement of Legislation to the Northeast Assembly Floor
(a) Except as provided in subsection
s
(c)
, (d) and (e)
, the Lt. Governor shall introduce legislation from the Northeast Assembly proposed legislation thread on the Northeast Assembly floor in chronological order, starting with the earliest piece of proposed legislation, except that the Lt. Governor shall not introduce more than two (2) pieces of legislation from the same Representative
, initial sponsoring citizen, or the Governor
before introducing legislation from other Representatives
or the Governor
that has been proposed before the date such third piece of proposed legislation would have otherwise been brought to the Northeast Assembly floor.
(b) Except as provided in subsection
(e)
, only one piece of legislation shall be placed on the Northeast Assembly floor at a time.
(c) Any Representative may make a motion to suspend section 2(a) of this Standing Order to move a piece proposed legislation to the top of the queue. The motion shall be immediately put to a vote on the Northeast Assembly floor. Such vote shall be open for 24 hours. If the motion passes by a vote of the majority of all Representatives (with abstentions and absences counted as nay votes), the Lt. Governor shall move such piece of proposed legislation to the Northeast Assembly floor immediately after any legislation then currently on the Northeast Assembly floor is voted upon or tabled.
(d) Except as provided in subsection (a), the Lt. Governor shall place legislation successfully proposed by citizens on the Northeast Assembly floor immediately after any current legislation then on the Northeast Assembly floor is finally voted upon or tabled.
(e) The Lt. Governor shall place any legislation that is vetoed by the Governor on the Northeast Assembly floor immediately after such veto. Veto override votes may occur while other legislation is on the Northeast Assembly floor.
3.
Legislative Debates and Voting
(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (h), all proposed legislation
other than veto override votes
shall be open for debate until seventy-two (72) hours after the Lt. Governor introduces it to the Northeast Assembly floor.
(b) During debate, Representatives may suggest amendments to proposed legislation. If the sponsor of the proposed legislation publicly deems the amendment friendly, no vote on the amendment shall be required. If the sponsor of the proposed legislation does not publicly deem the amendment friendly, a vote on the amendment shall be taken at the end of the debate period.
(c) The sponsor of a proposed amendment may remove it from the Assembly floor by tabling it at any time before the end of the debate period.
(d) A vote will be held on all proposed amendments not deemed friendly at the end of the debate period. Such vote shall be open for twenty-four (24) hours. An amendment shall pass if a majority of Representatives vote in favor of it (with abstentions and absences not counted as votes).
(e) The sponsor of a piece of proposed legislation may remove it from the Assembly floor by tabling it at any time before a final vote is taken on the proposed legislation.
(f) A final vote
on
the proposed legislation shall take place immediately after the Lt. Governor certifies the vote on any proposed amendments (or, if there are no such amendments, at the end of the debate period).
A final vote on veto overrides shall take place immediately after the Lt. Governor places it on the Northeast Assembly floor
. Such vote
s
shall be open for twenty-four (24) hours. A piece of proposed legislation
or veto override
shall pass if a majority of Representatives vote in favor of it (with abstentions and absences not counted as votes).
(g) The Lt. Governor shall certify the results of any vote within twenty-four (24) hours of the end of the voting period.
(h) Any Representative may make a motion to suspend sections 3(a), 3(d) or 3(f) of this Standing Order to increase or decrease the time of the debate or voting period. The motion shall be immediately put to a vote on the Northeast Assembly floor. Such vote shall be open for
twenty-four (
24
)
hours. If the motion passes by a vote of the majority of all Representatives (with abstentions and absences counted as nay votes), the relevant period shall be changed.
4.
Terminology
(a) All legislation regarding the rules of the Northeast Assembly shall be called Standing Orders.
(b) All proposed legislation that requires the signature of the Governor shall be called a Bill until signed and thereafter an Act.
(c) The Lt. Governor shall maintain a public list of Standing Orders, unsuccessful bills actually voted upon, and Acts in the Atlasia Wiki for the Northeast, with a link to the text of such legislation.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,518
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #78 on:
September 30, 2009, 03:01:43 PM »
Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on September 30, 2009, 02:56:15 PM
Why should the Lieutenant Governor be the only one to officially introduce pieces of legislation ? This should be done by any representative whenever he wants.
Under Section 15 of the
Constitutional Amendment creating this Assembly
, the Lt. Governor runs the Assembly floor. Therefore, he should move legislation from the proposed legislation thread to the Assembly floor.
That's all I meant by introduces, though it might not be the right term. The person who initially sponsors a bill in the proposed legislation thread would have all say on amendments and the like, not the Lt. Governor.
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 9,167
Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #79 on:
September 30, 2009, 03:08:19 PM »
I like the SOAP, cinyc.
Logged
God-Empress Stacey I of House Abrams
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
Posts: 53,374
Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #80 on:
September 30, 2009, 03:11:03 PM »
Quote from: cinyc on September 30, 2009, 03:01:43 PM
Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on September 30, 2009, 02:56:15 PM
Why should the Lieutenant Governor be the only one to officially introduce pieces of legislation ? This should be done by any representative whenever he wants.
Under Section 15 of the
Constitutional Amendment creating this Assembly
, the Lt. Governor runs the Assembly floor. Therefore, he should move legislation from the proposed legislation thread to the Assembly floor.
That's all I meant by introduces, though it might not be the right term. The person who initially sponsors a bill in the proposed legislation thread would have all say on amendments and the like, not the Lt. Governor.
Well, I think I know this Amendment, since I wrote most of it.
What I meant is just that LG certifies the vote results, just as did the CJO previously. I understand you point, but you should replace the verb "introduce" by something different, to make clear that Lt Gov hasn't any "right of veto" on this (I obviously don't fear anything from Barnes
but yu never know).
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,518
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #81 on:
September 30, 2009, 03:15:12 PM »
«
Edited:
September 30, 2009, 03:22:16 PM
by
cinyc »
Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on September 30, 2009, 03:11:03 PM
Quote from: cinyc on September 30, 2009, 03:01:43 PM
Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on September 30, 2009, 02:56:15 PM
Why should the Lieutenant Governor be the only one to officially introduce pieces of legislation ? This should be done by any representative whenever he wants.
Under Section 15 of the
Constitutional Amendment creating this Assembly
, the Lt. Governor runs the Assembly floor. Therefore, he should move legislation from the proposed legislation thread to the Assembly floor.
That's all I meant by introduces, though it might not be the right term. The person who initially sponsors a bill in the proposed legislation thread would have all say on amendments and the like, not the Lt. Governor.
Well, I think I know this Amendment, since I wrote most of it.
What I meant is just that LG certifies the vote results, just as did the CJO previously. I understand you point, but you should replace the verb "introduce" by something different, to make clear that Lt Gov hasn't any "right of veto" on this (I obviously don't fear anything from Barnes
but yu never know).
Is "move" better than "introduce" or is there some other verb you have in mind? I can't think of another one. Maybe "place"?
Logged
Smid
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 6,152
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #82 on:
September 30, 2009, 07:25:47 PM »
Cinyc - exceptionally well done on these Standing Orders! Sensational work!
How about "invites the sponsor to move or moves if the sponsor is a concerned citizen or the Governor" rather than "introduces"? That leaves the Lt Gov in charge of ordering the introduction of Bills to the House, but leaves him/her bound by the SOAP - preventing them from potentially vetoing a Bill by refusing to introduce it?
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,518
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #83 on:
September 30, 2009, 10:57:24 PM »
Quote from: Smid on September 30, 2009, 07:25:47 PM
Cinyc - exceptionally well done on these Standing Orders! Sensational work!
How about "invites the sponsor to move or moves if the sponsor is a concerned citizen or the Governor" rather than "introduces"? That leaves the Lt Gov in charge of ordering the introduction of Bills to the House, but leaves him/her bound by the SOAP - preventing them from potentially vetoing a Bill by refusing to introduce it?
What happens if a sponsor is absent and doesn't move it ASAP? Should we have a time limit before the Lt. Gov moves on to the next bill? Or should we just let the Lt. Gov place it on the floor?
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 9,167
Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #84 on:
October 01, 2009, 12:06:36 AM »
Quote from: cinyc on September 30, 2009, 10:57:24 PM
Quote from: Smid on September 30, 2009, 07:25:47 PM
Cinyc - exceptionally well done on these Standing Orders! Sensational work!
How about "invites the sponsor to move or moves if the sponsor is a concerned citizen or the Governor" rather than "introduces"? That leaves the Lt Gov in charge of ordering the introduction of Bills to the House, but leaves him/her bound by the SOAP - preventing them from potentially vetoing a Bill by refusing to introduce it?
What happens if a sponsor is absent and doesn't move it ASAP? Should we have a time limit before the Lt. Gov moves on to the next bill? Or should we just let the Lt. Gov place it on the floor?
How about whoever gets to it first so that we can proceed as quickly as possible?
Logged
God-Empress Stacey I of House Abrams
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
Posts: 53,374
Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #85 on:
October 01, 2009, 12:48:43 AM »
Quote from: Smid on September 30, 2009, 07:25:47 PM
Cinyc - exceptionally well done on these Standing Orders! Sensational work!
How about "invites the sponsor to move or moves if the sponsor is a concerned citizen or the Governor" rather than "introduces"? That leaves the Lt Gov in charge of ordering the introduction of Bills to the House, but leaves him/her bound by the SOAP - preventing them from potentially vetoing a Bill by refusing to introduce it?
We could just write that someone who introduces a bill shall do it in both the threads immediately. Could it work ?
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 9,167
Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #86 on:
October 01, 2009, 12:49:56 AM »
Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on October 01, 2009, 12:48:43 AM
Quote from: Smid on September 30, 2009, 07:25:47 PM
Cinyc - exceptionally well done on these Standing Orders! Sensational work!
How about "invites the sponsor to move or moves if the sponsor is a concerned citizen or the Governor" rather than "introduces"? That leaves the Lt Gov in charge of ordering the introduction of Bills to the House, but leaves him/her bound by the SOAP - preventing them from potentially vetoing a Bill by refusing to introduce it?
We could just write that someone who introduces a bill shall do it in both the threads immediately. Could it work ?
No. We don't want to clutter the floor too much.
Logged
God-Empress Stacey I of House Abrams
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
Posts: 53,374
Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #87 on:
October 01, 2009, 12:52:02 AM »
Quote from: Northeast Representative Alexander Hamilton on October 01, 2009, 12:49:56 AM
Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on October 01, 2009, 12:48:43 AM
Quote from: Smid on September 30, 2009, 07:25:47 PM
Cinyc - exceptionally well done on these Standing Orders! Sensational work!
How about "invites the sponsor to move or moves if the sponsor is a concerned citizen or the Governor" rather than "introduces"? That leaves the Lt Gov in charge of ordering the introduction of Bills to the House, but leaves him/her bound by the SOAP - preventing them from potentially vetoing a Bill by refusing to introduce it?
We could just write that someone who introduces a bill shall do it in both the threads immediately. Could it work ?
No. We don't want to clutter the floor too much.
Any Rep has the right to introduce bills. This right should be fully guaranteed.
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 9,167
Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #88 on:
October 01, 2009, 12:54:35 AM »
Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on October 01, 2009, 12:52:02 AM
Quote from: Northeast Representative Alexander Hamilton on October 01, 2009, 12:49:56 AM
Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on October 01, 2009, 12:48:43 AM
Quote from: Smid on September 30, 2009, 07:25:47 PM
Cinyc - exceptionally well done on these Standing Orders! Sensational work!
How about "invites the sponsor to move or moves if the sponsor is a concerned citizen or the Governor" rather than "introduces"? That leaves the Lt Gov in charge of ordering the introduction of Bills to the House, but leaves him/her bound by the SOAP - preventing them from potentially vetoing a Bill by refusing to introduce it?
We could just write that someone who introduces a bill shall do it in both the threads immediately. Could it work ?
No. We don't want to clutter the floor too much.
Any Rep has the right to introduce bills. This right should be fully guaranteed.
No
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,518
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #89 on:
October 01, 2009, 01:09:41 AM »
«
Edited:
October 01, 2009, 01:13:34 AM
by
cinyc »
Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on October 01, 2009, 12:48:43 AM
Quote from: Smid on September 30, 2009, 07:25:47 PM
Cinyc - exceptionally well done on these Standing Orders! Sensational work!
How about "invites the sponsor to move or moves if the sponsor is a concerned citizen or the Governor" rather than "introduces"? That leaves the Lt Gov in charge of ordering the introduction of Bills to the House, but leaves him/her bound by the SOAP - preventing them from potentially vetoing a Bill by refusing to introduce it?
We could just write that someone who introduces a bill shall do it in both the threads immediately. Could it work ?
I don't think we should have tons of legislation on the floor at the same time, which may happen if we let Representatives just propose legislation in both threads. Having more than one bill open for discussion would clutter up the Assembly thread and make things confusing. Unlike the Atlasian Senate, we have only one Assembly thread to conduct all floor business. The nature of the Atlas Fantasy Elections sub-board doesn't lend itself to a regional legislature having more than one or two threads - things would get lost to the second or third page of the sub-board if Representatives don't comment on it for a day or so.
I'd prefer that the President of the Senate (i.e. the Lt. Governor unless designated to the Speaker) move items from the proposed legislation thread on the Assembly floor whenever a bill is passed or tabled. This is similar to what the President Pro Tempore does in the Senate - which seems to work fine there. We can make sure the Lt. Governor has no discretion over which items to place on the floor by using a proper phrasing like "place on the Northeast Assembly floor" or "place on the Northeast Assembly floor on behalf (and stating the name) of the sponsor", and specifying the order in which items must be placed on the floor (which Section 2 of my proposed bill already does). Or perhaps by just adding a sentence stating that the Lt. Governor has no power to change the order in which items are placed on the floor.
Logged
Purple State
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 6,713
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #90 on:
October 01, 2009, 01:14:39 AM »
Why have a second thread? If legislation is proposed the Speaker of President can place it on a queue with links that can be reposted intermittently with the pending order of business. That way things are kept orderly, but you don't clog the entire board. Between the Mideast and Northeast legislatures, along with member offices, you are looking at 11 threads! No reason to add another.
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 9,167
Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #91 on:
October 01, 2009, 01:16:10 AM »
Quote from: GM Purple State on October 01, 2009, 01:14:39 AM
Why have a second thread? If legislation is proposed the Speaker of President can place it on a queue with links that can be reposted intermittently with the pending order of business. That way things are kept orderly, but you don't clog the entire board. Between the Mideast and Northeast legislatures, along with member offices, you are looking at 11 threads! No reason to add another.
There should be a regional government board for all the regional governments to post on.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,518
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #92 on:
October 01, 2009, 01:22:00 AM »
Quote from: GM Purple State on October 01, 2009, 01:14:39 AM
Why have a second thread? If legislation is proposed the Speaker of President can place it on a queue with links that can be reposted intermittently with the pending order of business. That way things are kept orderly, but you don't clog the entire board. Between the Mideast and Northeast legislatures, along with member offices, you are looking at 11 threads! No reason to add another.
The reason for a separate proposed legislation thread is so that everyone knows where to find all proposed NE legislation and can easily figure out what should be up next should the Lt. Governor/Speaker try to play games with the agenda. Links are only as good as the person who maintains them, and proposing legislation in the NE Assembly floor thread would clutter this thread and could lead to confusion as to which bill is actually being debated at any given time.
We're not asking for much.
Logged
Purple State
Concerned Citizen
Posts: 6,713
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #93 on:
October 01, 2009, 01:30:29 AM »
Quote from: cinyc on October 01, 2009, 01:22:00 AM
Quote from: GM Purple State on October 01, 2009, 01:14:39 AM
Why have a second thread? If legislation is proposed the Speaker of President can place it on a queue with links that can be reposted intermittently with the pending order of business. That way things are kept orderly, but you don't clog the entire board. Between the Mideast and Northeast legislatures, along with member offices, you are looking at 11 threads! No reason to add another.
The reason for a separate proposed legislation thread is so that everyone knows where to find all proposed NE legislation and can easily figure out what should be up next should the Lt. Governor/Speaker try to play games with the agenda. Links are only as good as the person who maintains them, and proposing legislation in the NE Assembly floor thread would clutter this thread and could lead to confusion as to which bill is actually being debated at any given time.
We're not asking for much.
Just making sure you realize that 3 ME assemblymen threads + ME Assembly + NE Assembly + NE Assembly Legislation + 6 NE assemblymen = 12 threads. The first page of this board can hold thirteen non-stickied threads.
Perhaps a regional government sub-board will soon be necessary. A thought for the mods to bring up to Dave perhaps. If one more region passes a legislature it will definitely be needed.
Logged
big bad fab
filliatre
Atlas Icon
Posts: 13,346
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #94 on:
October 01, 2009, 03:20:01 AM »
Quote from: GM Purple State on October 01, 2009, 01:30:29 AM
Quote from: cinyc on October 01, 2009, 01:22:00 AM
Quote from: GM Purple State on October 01, 2009, 01:14:39 AM
Why have a second thread? If legislation is proposed the Speaker of President can place it on a queue with links that can be reposted intermittently with the pending order of business. That way things are kept orderly, but you don't clog the entire board. Between the Mideast and Northeast legislatures, along with member offices, you are looking at 11 threads! No reason to add another.
The reason for a separate proposed legislation thread is so that everyone knows where to find all proposed NE legislation and can easily figure out what should be up next should the Lt. Governor/Speaker try to play games with the agenda. Links are only as good as the person who maintains them, and proposing legislation in the NE Assembly floor thread would clutter this thread and could lead to confusion as to which bill is actually being debated at any given time.
We're not asking for much.
Just making sure you realize that 3 ME assemblymen threads + ME Assembly + NE Assembly + NE Assembly Legislation + 6 NE assemblymen = 12 threads. The first page of this board can hold thirteen non-stickied threads.
Perhaps a regional government sub-board will soon be necessary. A thought for the mods to bring up to Dave perhaps. If one more region passes a legislature it will definitely be needed.
I allow myself to post in this thread, just to concur with PS, as Mideast assemblyman.
Logged
God-Empress Stacey I of House Abrams
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
Posts: 53,374
Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #95 on:
October 01, 2009, 06:06:37 AM »
Quote from: cinyc on October 01, 2009, 01:09:41 AM
Quote from: Northeast Representative Antonio V on October 01, 2009, 12:48:43 AM
Quote from: Smid on September 30, 2009, 07:25:47 PM
Cinyc - exceptionally well done on these Standing Orders! Sensational work!
How about "invites the sponsor to move or moves if the sponsor is a concerned citizen or the Governor" rather than "introduces"? That leaves the Lt Gov in charge of ordering the introduction of Bills to the House, but leaves him/her bound by the SOAP - preventing them from potentially vetoing a Bill by refusing to introduce it?
We could just write that someone who introduces a bill shall do it in both the threads immediately. Could it work ?
I don't think we should have tons of legislation on the floor at the same time, which may happen if we let Representatives just propose legislation in both threads. Having more than one bill open for discussion would clutter up the Assembly thread and make things confusing. Unlike the Atlasian Senate, we have only one Assembly thread to conduct all floor business. The nature of the Atlas Fantasy Elections sub-board doesn't lend itself to a regional legislature having more than one or two threads - things would get lost to the second or third page of the sub-board if Representatives don't comment on it for a day or so.
I'd prefer that the President of the Senate (i.e. the Lt. Governor unless designated to the Speaker) move items from the proposed legislation thread on the Assembly floor whenever a bill is passed or tabled. This is similar to what the President Pro Tempore does in the Senate - which seems to work fine there. We can make sure the Lt. Governor has no discretion over which items to place on the floor by using a proper phrasing like "place on the Northeast Assembly floor" or "place on the Northeast Assembly floor on behalf (and stating the name) of the sponsor", and specifying the order in which items must be placed on the floor (which Section 2 of my proposed bill already does). Or perhaps by just adding a sentence stating that the Lt. Governor has no power to change the order in which items are placed on the floor.
Seems good.
Quote from: GM Purple State on October 01, 2009, 01:30:29 AM
Quote from: cinyc on October 01, 2009, 01:22:00 AM
Quote from: GM Purple State on October 01, 2009, 01:14:39 AM
Why have a second thread? If legislation is proposed the Speaker of President can place it on a queue with links that can be reposted intermittently with the pending order of business. That way things are kept orderly, but you don't clog the entire board. Between the Mideast and Northeast legislatures, along with member offices, you are looking at 11 threads! No reason to add another.
The reason for a separate proposed legislation thread is so that everyone knows where to find all proposed NE legislation and can easily figure out what should be up next should the Lt. Governor/Speaker try to play games with the agenda. Links are only as good as the person who maintains them, and proposing legislation in the NE Assembly floor thread would clutter this thread and could lead to confusion as to which bill is actually being debated at any given time.
We're not asking for much.
Just making sure you realize that 3 ME assemblymen threads + ME Assembly + NE Assembly + NE Assembly Legislation + 6 NE assemblymen = 12 threads. The first page of this board can hold thirteen non-stickied threads.
Well, 12 or 13 doesn't change so much.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Superstar
Posts: 30,653
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #96 on:
October 01, 2009, 07:37:02 AM »
Quote from: big bad fab on October 01, 2009, 03:20:01 AM
Quote from: GM Purple State on October 01, 2009, 01:30:29 AM
Quote from: cinyc on October 01, 2009, 01:22:00 AM
Quote from: GM Purple State on October 01, 2009, 01:14:39 AM
Why have a second thread? If legislation is proposed the Speaker of President can place it on a queue with links that can be reposted intermittently with the pending order of business. That way things are kept orderly, but you don't clog the entire board. Between the Mideast and Northeast legislatures, along with member offices, you are looking at 11 threads! No reason to add another.
The reason for a separate proposed legislation thread is so that everyone knows where to find all proposed NE legislation and can easily figure out what should be up next should the Lt. Governor/Speaker try to play games with the agenda. Links are only as good as the person who maintains them, and proposing legislation in the NE Assembly floor thread would clutter this thread and could lead to confusion as to which bill is actually being debated at any given time.
We're not asking for much.
Just making sure you realize that 3 ME assemblymen threads + ME Assembly + NE Assembly + NE Assembly Legislation + 6 NE assemblymen = 12 threads. The first page of this board can hold thirteen non-stickied threads.
Perhaps a regional government sub-board will soon be necessary. A thought for the mods to bring up to Dave perhaps. If one more region passes a legislature it will definitely be needed.
I allow myself to post in this thread, just to concur with PS, as Mideast assemblyman.
What Fab said.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,518
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #97 on:
October 01, 2009, 12:42:09 PM »
«
Edited:
October 01, 2009, 12:50:48 PM
by
cinyc »
Third Draft (new language from the first draft in
red
)
Standing Order on Assembly Procedure
1.
Proposed Legislation Thread
(a) The Lt. Governor shall open a new Northeast Assembly proposed legislation thread at the start of each Northeast Assembly term.
(b) Representatives,
the Governor and any concerned Northeast citizen
shall post the full text of any proposed legislation in a response to the Northeast Assembly proposed legislation thread for the current term. Each response shall contain only one piece of proposed legislation.
(c) Nothing shall be posted to the Northeast Assembly proposed legislation thread except proposed legislation
or a Northeast citizen's signature for proposed citizen legislation
.
2.
Movement of Legislation to the Northeast Assembly Floor
(a) Except as provided in subsection
s
(c)
, (d), (e) and (f)
, the Lt. Governor shall
place
legislation from the Northeast Assembly proposed legislation thread on the Northeast Assembly floor
(on behalf and stating the name of the sponsor)
in chronological order, starting with the earliest piece of proposed legislation, except that the Lt. Governor shall not
place
more than two (2) pieces of legislation from the same Representative
, initial sponsoring citizen, or the Governor
before placing legislation from other Representatives
or the Governor
that has been proposed before the date such third piece of proposed legislation would have otherwise been brought to the Northeast Assembly floor.
(b) Except as provided in subsection
(e) and (f)
, only one piece of legislation shall be placed on the Northeast Assembly floor at a time.
(c) Any Representative may make a motion to suspend section 2(a) of this Standing Order to move a piece proposed legislation to the top of the queue. The motion shall be immediately put to a vote on the Northeast Assembly floor. Such vote shall be open for 24 hours. If the motion passes by a vote of the majority of all Representatives (with abstentions and absences counted as nay votes), the Lt. Governor shall
place
such piece of proposed legislation
on
the Northeast Assembly floor immediately after any legislation then currently on the Northeast Assembly floor is voted upon or tabled.
(d) Any Representative may make a motion to suspend section 2(b) of this Standing Order to place more than one piece of legislation on the Northeast Assembly floor at any given time. The motion shall be immediately put to a vote on the Northeast Assembly floor. Such vote shall be open for 24 hours. If the motion passes by a vote of the majority of all Representatives (with abstentions and absences counted as nay votes), the Lt. Governor shall place such additional pieces of proposed legislation on the Northeast Assembly floor immediately at the end of the voting period.
(e) Except as provided in subsection (a), the Lt. Governor shall place legislation successfully proposed by citizens on the Northeast Assembly floor immediately after any current legislation then on the Northeast Assembly floor is finally voted upon or tabled.
(f) The Lt. Governor shall place any legislation that is vetoed by the Governor on the Northeast Assembly floor immediately after such veto. Veto override votes may occur while other legislation is on the Northeast Assembly floor.
(g) Nothing in this Section 2 shall allow the Lt. Governor to do anything but place proposed legislation on the Northeast Assembly floor on behalf of the sponsor of such legislation.
3.
Legislative Debates and Voting
(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (h), all proposed legislation
other than veto override votes
shall be open for debate until seventy-two (72) hours after the Lt. Governor places it on the Northeast Assembly floor.
(b) During debate, Representatives may suggest amendments to proposed legislation. If the sponsor of the proposed legislation publicly deems the amendment friendly, no vote on the amendment shall be required. If the sponsor of the proposed legislation does not publicly deem the amendment friendly, a vote on the amendment shall be taken at the end of the debate period.
(c) The sponsor of a proposed amendment may remove it from the Assembly floor by tabling it at any time before the end of the debate period.
(d) A vote will be held on all proposed amendments not deemed friendly at the end of the debate period. Such vote shall be open for twenty-four (24) hours. An amendment shall pass if a majority of Representatives vote in favor of it (with abstentions and absences not counted as votes).
(e) The sponsor of a piece of proposed legislation may remove it from the Assembly floor by tabling it at any time before a final vote is taken on the proposed legislation.
(f) A final vote
on
the proposed legislation shall take place immediately after the Lt. Governor certifies the vote on any proposed amendments (or, if there are no such amendments, at the end of the debate period).
A final vote on veto overrides shall take place immediately after the Lt. Governor places it on the Northeast Assembly floor
. Such vote
s
shall be open for twenty-four (24) hours. A piece of proposed legislation
or veto override
shall pass if a majority of Representatives vote in favor of it (with abstentions and absences not counted as votes).
(g) The Lt. Governor shall certify the results of any vote within twenty-four (24) hours of the end of the voting period.
(h) Any Representative may make a motion to suspend sections 3(a), 3(d) or 3(f) of this Standing Order to increase or decrease the time of the debate or voting period. The motion shall be immediately put to a vote on the Northeast Assembly floor. Such vote shall be open for
twenty-four (
24
)
hours. If the motion passes by a vote of the majority of all Representatives (with abstentions and absences counted as nay votes), the relevant period shall be changed.
4.
Terminology
(a) All legislation regarding the rules of the Northeast Assembly shall be called Standing Orders.
(b) All proposed legislation that requires the signature of the Governor shall be called a Bill until signed and thereafter an Act.
(c) The Lt. Governor shall maintain a public list of Standing Orders, unsuccessful bills actually voted upon, and Acts in the Atlasia Wiki for the Northeast, with a link to the text of such legislation.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
Posts: 12,518
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #98 on:
October 01, 2009, 12:47:16 PM »
I think my Third Draft of the SOAP is complete enough to be put to a vote should the Speaker deem it possible at this time.
The two main changes from the second draft were to change "introduce" to "place" and add a section allowing Representatives to make a motion to place more than one piece of proposed legislation on the Senate floor at any given time. I've also added a subsection making it clear that the only power the Lt. Governor has is to place items on the floor.
Logged
God-Empress Stacey I of House Abrams
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
Posts: 53,374
Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83
Re: Northeast Assembly Thread
«
Reply #99 on:
October 01, 2009, 12:51:12 PM »
Quote from: cinyc on October 01, 2009, 12:47:16 PM
I think my Third Draft of the SOAP is complete enough to be put to a vote should the Speaker deem it possible at this time.
The two main changes from the second draft were to change "introduce" to "place" and add a section allowing Representatives to make a motion to place more than one piece of proposed legislation on the Senate floor at any given time. I've also added a subsection making it clear that the only power the Lt. Governor has is to place items on the floor.
Seems great. I would like to congratulate you for your work.
Aye
Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
[
4
]
5
6
7
8
9
...
239
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2024 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2024 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2024 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Polling
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/State Elections
===> 2022 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2021 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2022 Senate & House Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
About this Site
-----------------------------
===> How To
=> The Atlas
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> Election Archive
===> 2018 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2018 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=====> 2014 House Election Polls
=====> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 Elections
=====> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2012 House Election Polls
=====> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=====> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
=====> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Elections
=====> 2010 House Election Polls
=====> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Elections
=====> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
=====> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2006 Elections
=====> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
=====> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
=====> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
=====> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> 2020 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2020 Senate & House Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliament
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Terms of Service
-
DMCA Agent and Policy
-
Privacy Policy and Cookies
Powered by SMF 1.1.21
|
SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.08 seconds with 14 queries.
Loading...