Northeast Assembly Thread

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

"Class" is a perfectly appropriate term, and more succinct to boot.

There are no social classes under a regional nor federal law.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Agreed that "socioeconomic status" is preferred to "class."

Agreed with this.

I will not withdraw my amendment, and would like to second the motion made by Rep. Antonio.

Proposed Bill is very needed, but my only concern is terminology. Socialeconomic status is fair term, because, I repeat, neither regional or federal law allows or recognize any "classes".

I second motion made by Rep. Antonio too. 

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Amendment 1 (Rep. Mr. Moderate: AYE
Amendment 2 (Rep. Doctor Cynic): AYE
Amendment 3 (Rep. Sewer Socialist): NAY
Amendment 4 (Rep. Kalwjet): AYE

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Note to Moderate: if you want this bill to exist, vote nay on the first two amendments.

taking bill a hostage

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

I agree "smell" amendment is a joke.

But there are things like gender orientation we should not ignore.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

I agree "smell" amendment is a joke.

But there are things like gender orientation we should not ignore.

smell is more reasonable than the other two.

I'd rather recomment Dr Cynic to withdraw size thing and merge it into anti his Obese disrcriminatory act, modified into anti obese and size discriminatory.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

I don't need to have sympathy for overeaters, let alone have the government not work with those who don't hire a huge person. Next we know the government is going to have to super size everything.

This is not about sympathy, but about justice.

Size and smell are both choices.

Lose weight and take a shower.

Obesity is a disorded. It's not work that way "hey, lose weight".

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Would you consider 15? Because 16 is ridicolous.

And 18 instead of 21.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

This simply allows 14 year ols to consent with people up to 21. The only change I'm willing to make it to lower 21 to 19.

I propose lower it to 18

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

This simply allows 14 year ols to consent with people up to 21. The only change I'm willing to make it to lower 21 to 19.

I propose lower it to 18

nah

May I ask why you think otherwise?

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

I propose lower it to 18

nah

May I ask why you think otherwise?

u first

All right, since we have actual debate.

I generally support that since person reach age of consent (whenever it is 14, 15 or 16) she or he should be free to engage in sexual relationship with others above this age no matter of whenever it's above . But if there's no approval of that, 18 would be fairer than 19.

It's hiporcitical to allow 16 year old to have sex with people up to 19, but not let say 21.

Your turn, Representative.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Not worthy of response from me.

Typical for you.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Hamilton proves once again he's only attention-seeker. He's not interested in debate and feel even offended if someone else have suggestions He want to either take full credit or to kill the bill, if we don't follow him like blind zombies. He refuses to engage in debate.

Pathetic.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Yeah, no one could answer any of our questions about the stupid amendments.

It’s easy to avoid any debate if you just label questions “stupid”

I don’t care if you respond to me, but can’t you show some respect for the Assembly? Where is a dude full of ideas and will of cooperation I remember since first term?

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

I don’t care if you respond to me, but can’t you show some respect for the Assembly?

And you are showing respect for the Assembly by personally attacking other members of the Assembly rather than debating the legislation at hand?

He refused to present his arguments.

How is that debate?

Seriously, guys, we may not love each other, but reserve this for forum community,

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

It's very sad to hear that (congratulations of job, we can't have all).

We will trurly miss you as much as we will wait for your return

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

NAY

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

I oppose to substaing ridicolous age of contest.

It should be 14 or 15.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Age of contest of 16 is simply ridicolous.

If we can't have 14, why not 15 as a compromise?

Anyway, I would vote against 16 under ANY circumstances.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Age of contest of 16 is simply ridicolous.

If we can't have 14, why not 15 as a compromise?

Anyway, I would vote against 16 under ANY circumstances.

Because those of us who aren't card-carrying NAMBLA members are uncomfortable enough with 16 as-is.

Oh yes, what's wrong with 15?

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Oh yes, what's wrong with 15?

Why should a college senior not be having sex with a high school sophomore?  Really?  You need reasons why?

My whole point is that under many juridsictions act of consent is 15 and that's seem perfectly fine (13 would be gross for example).

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

We have no express power to do so.  The Joe Wilson Act takes any power we may have had in that area away from us.

Ok, Mr. Speaker, to clarify:

So they cannot post, but cannot be really removed from office too?

That means constant absentions?

With one vacancy, which is to fill, and permanently absent 2 Representatives, who are technically in office, we have 5 members to vote?

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I have a question for Rep. Antonio V regarding Anti-Discriminatory Act he reintroduced with former Rep. Doctor Cynic as co-sponsor. With Doctor Cynic departure, can I be allowed to act as co-sponson?

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

I dont know if it helps, but I too saw Hamiltons vote, as well as Sewers abstain.

We all saw

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

I'm not happy with the age of consent remaining ridicolous 16, but I'm not going to sink the entire bill.

Aye.