Kennedy Special Election Omnibus Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2024, 04:24:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Kennedy Special Election Omnibus Thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 9
Author Topic: Kennedy Special Election Omnibus Thread  (Read 32656 times)
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: August 28, 2009, 09:44:49 AM »

Capuano declined an opportunity to say he wouldn't run, saying (on Weds.) that today wasn't the day to answer questions like this. That doesn't tell us anything we didn't know already.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: August 28, 2009, 01:03:52 PM »

I guess I'm going for Capuano.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: August 28, 2009, 01:12:19 PM »


I want to see him vetted first.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: August 28, 2009, 01:58:18 PM »

God, I was thinking Coakley would be the best choice, but there must be something wrong with her if Walter *and* Mr. M both like her.

I was thinking the same, no offense to MM or Walter. Tongue
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: August 28, 2009, 02:03:22 PM »

I was thinking the same, no offense to MM or Walter. Tongue

I think it's more a testament to her focus on work over partisanship.  I'll grant that I don't know much about her other than the fact that she's been a good prosecutor and Attorney General.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: August 28, 2009, 02:08:13 PM »

Oh, and lest we forget, WaPo has speculation over who Patrick will name once the legislature crams through a change to succession law:

Former Gov. Mike Dukakis  (ugh)
Former AG Scott Harshbarger (ugh)
Former Treasurer Shannon O'Brien (ughx2)
Paul G. Kirk, chairman of the JFK Pres. Library
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: August 28, 2009, 05:26:44 PM »

dukakis is the best choice for caretaker.
Logged
Kevinstat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,823


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: August 28, 2009, 08:56:07 PM »
« Edited: August 29, 2009, 07:04:27 PM by Kevinstat »

Mr. Moderate's mentions of Harshbarger and O'Brien got me thiking of another Democratic gubernatorial candidate from the wilderness years (not that Democrats in Massachusetts were really in the political wilderness during that time, but they were out of the Governor's mansion for 16 years).  Might Governor Patrick appoint Robert Reich as caretaker.  I imagine he'd vote much like Ted Kennedy would have on health care, although perhaps Reich wouldn't be as willing to compromise to the extent that increasingly seems likely to be necessary.  Does anyone here know who Patrick supported for Governor in the Democratic primary in 2002?  That might provide some clues as to whom he might appoint as caretaker if he is given the chance.  Of course, that was a campaign for a full-term and an endorsment from whatever Patrick was at the time is not the same as a Gubernatorial appointment.
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: August 30, 2009, 01:22:50 AM »


*vomits*
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: August 30, 2009, 01:23:45 AM »

some sox player is in the running for the GOP nom, if the Dems ended up with a 25% plurality weak candidate, that could materialize into 59 Dem senators.... probs not gonnaz happen though
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,824


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: August 30, 2009, 02:08:15 AM »

I guess we still don't know who is actually going to run in this Massachusetts Senate election, but Ted Kennedy III has announced for the 2044 election (that's John Kerry's seat).

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/08/29/kennedy-announces-for-senate/
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: August 30, 2009, 02:10:27 AM »

how is that not an Onion story
Logged
bgwah
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: August 30, 2009, 03:03:09 AM »

I guess we still don't know who is actually going to run in this Massachusetts Senate election, but Ted Kennedy III has announced for the 2044 election (that's John Kerry's seat).

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/08/29/kennedy-announces-for-senate/

Awesome.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: August 30, 2009, 05:26:40 PM »

Kid needs to cut his hair.
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: August 30, 2009, 05:40:01 PM »


That'd actually be pretty cool, but he'd never get it.
Logged
pogo stick
JewishConservative
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,429
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: August 30, 2009, 07:05:38 PM »

I'd like to see Former Lt. Gov Kerry Healey to be the GOP Nominee. IDK what her chances are but she can't  be that bad of a choice.


So yea.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: August 31, 2009, 08:04:43 AM »

I'd like to see Former Lt. Gov Kerry Healey to be the GOP Nominee. IDK what her chances are but she can't  be that bad of a choice.

Her run for Governor was a career-ender. She humiliated herself and gave Patrick a landslide.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: August 31, 2009, 08:08:12 AM »


oh oh me me i do i do



zero.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: August 31, 2009, 10:23:25 AM »

Meanwhile, in the real world...!

We have bi-partisan consensus as to who should fill Kennedy's seat for the interim (even though it's not legal to do so yet—technicalities, technicalities):

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The article also mentions former Rep. Kennedy as a possible candidate for the Senate special election, specifically that he's being urged by his fellow Kennedys to run.

The Boston Globe adds that if Kennedy gets into the race, it'll be a lot less exciting (and crowded):

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.


Not much news on the GOP side, except confirmation from sources that Former LG Kerry Healey is considering a run.  (Yawn.)
Logged
Dan the Roman
liberalrepublican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,602
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: August 31, 2009, 02:35:43 PM »

Joe Kennedy is not some 800lb gorilla despite what the Kennedy-loving press wants to believe. There is no way he would clear the field when he failed to clear a much weaker field in 1998 for Governor, and is a much weaker and more controversial candidate now. The candidates who are considering dropping out are candidates without independent bases of support who need to win with 20%. Coakley is not going to be scared by Kennedy, nor is Lynch likely to be.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: August 31, 2009, 02:48:45 PM »

Joe Kennedy is not some 800lb gorilla despite what the Kennedy-loving press wants to believe. There is no way he would clear the field when he failed to clear a much weaker field in 1998 for Governor, and is a much weaker and more controversial candidate now. The candidates who are considering dropping out are candidates without independent bases of support who need to win with 20%. Coakley is not going to be scared by Kennedy, nor is Lynch likely to be.

The Globe said that Capuano and Markey said they would defer to Kennedy, interestingly. That doesn't clear the field but it does reshape it (and means less chance for a monorail for me.)
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: August 31, 2009, 02:51:11 PM »

Joe Kennedy is not some 800lb gorilla despite what the Kennedy-loving press wants to believe. There is no way he would clear the field when he failed to clear a much weaker field in 1998 for Governor, and is a much weaker and more controversial candidate now. The candidates who are considering dropping out are candidates without independent bases of support who need to win with 20%. Coakley is not going to be scared by Kennedy, nor is Lynch likely to be.

Presumably, though, his stock has rebounded considerably since 1998 (grief nets a lot of sympathy votes), and a quick election process works in his favor.  A lot of people will over look his faults simply because he's a Kennedy.
Logged
Dan the Roman
liberalrepublican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,602
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: August 31, 2009, 03:28:36 PM »

Joe Kennedy is not some 800lb gorilla despite what the Kennedy-loving press wants to believe. There is no way he would clear the field when he failed to clear a much weaker field in 1998 for Governor, and is a much weaker and more controversial candidate now. The candidates who are considering dropping out are candidates without independent bases of support who need to win with 20%. Coakley is not going to be scared by Kennedy, nor is Lynch likely to be.

Presumably, though, his stock has rebounded considerably since 1998 (grief nets a lot of sympathy votes), and a quick election process works in his favor.  A lot of people will over look his faults simply because he's a Kennedy.

Perhaps. More likely he is betting that the sympathy will make his opponents unlikely to go negative against a Kennedy, the attack ads being in bad taste. That said, I think Suffolk polled him v. Coakley earlier this year and she led 41-40.

The more interesting thing in that story however is not Kennedy but who is pushing him. Notice it is Dan Payne. Dan Payne was the man who began spreading rumors of Patrick running in 2005, and there is no way he would be doing this without the Governor's support. What this means is that Deval Patrick has found his anti-Coakley stalking horse, and there is a good chance that Joe is in line for the appointment, especially if it can be maneuvered so that he can run. Ironically therefore, the greatest impact is likely to be that the appointment bull is going to run into trouble. Therese Murray is not going to look kindly on a potential Kennedy appointment, and this is likely to hurt if not kill the bill if he can't be blocked from running.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: August 31, 2009, 05:06:19 PM »

If he just have to talk about Kennedy replacing Kennedy, the widow, Vicki, seems to be most acceatable choice.

Joe, who was a Representative, had too much skeletons in his closets. Other are carpetbaggers.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: August 31, 2009, 07:39:54 PM »

If he just have to talk about Kennedy replacing Kennedy, the widow, Vicki, seems to be most acceatable choice.

Joe, who was a Representative, had too much skeletons in his closets.

I generally don't like widows' succession to Congress, but I think she actually might be the perfect choice for a caretaker should the law be revised. She is politically active in her own right and presumably knows her husband's staff well. She could effectively finish his work and manage the transition to a new senator better than anyone else could. I wouldn't support her running for a full term, however. (Said for the benefit of my credibility here--I'm not exactly a powerhouse in Mass. Dem. politics.)

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I'm not sure how you're using that term.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 9  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.061 seconds with 11 queries.