Who would you have voted for--Republican primaries?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 01:36:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Who would you have voted for--Republican primaries?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Who would you have voted for--Republican primaries?  (Read 3595 times)
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,288
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 05, 2004, 04:47:34 PM »
« edited: February 05, 2004, 04:54:14 PM by Michael Zeigermann »

Who would you have voted for in the Republican primaries? Needless to say I would have stuck with candidates representing the moderate wing of the party:

1972: McCloskey
1976: Ford
1980: Anderson
1988: Bush
1992: Bush
1996: Alexander
2000: McCain

Btw, for a useful link on past primaries and their results, go to http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Agora/8088/ElectPandC.html (Republicans should beware, the commentaries have a liberal bias).
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2004, 05:05:54 PM »

Great site! Good work! Smiley
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2004, 05:54:20 PM »

"In 2000 the Republicans were so sick of being defeated by their moral enemy Clinton (including their self-inflicted wound from the moronic impeachment attempt...remember they spent $50 million and an enormous amount of time to investigate a blow job instead of, say, Islamic terrorist networks.)"

Yeah, they do have a little bit of a liberal bias.
Logged
Michael Z
Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,288
Political Matrix
E: -5.88, S: -4.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2004, 06:00:30 PM »

"In 2000 the Republicans were so sick of being defeated by their moral enemy Clinton (including their self-inflicted wound from the moronic impeachment attempt...remember they spent $50 million and an enormous amount of time to investigate a blow job instead of, say, Islamic terrorist networks.)"

Yeah, they do have a little bit of a liberal bias.

Yes, just a teeny weeny little bit. Wink Still, the maps are a useful source of information for conservatives and liberals alike.
Logged
TheWildCard
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,529
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2004, 07:30:15 PM »

1972 Nixon
1976 Ford
1980 Reagan
1984 Reagan
1988 Bush
1992 Bush
1996 I think Dole... But might have considered Forbes Buchanan on the other hand would not have even been in the realm of possibilities...
2000 Bush
2004 Bush!(what do ya know I can vote this year!)

BTW I'm not sure theres a word I can use to describe how blantently biased that site is...
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2004, 08:10:14 PM »

1972 Nixon
1976 Ford
1980 Anderson
1984 Reagan (puke)
1988 Kemp
1992 Bush
1996 Forbes
2000 McCain
2004 Bush (puke)

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yes, it's very biased.  But the maps are useful, and the commentary is humorous.
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2004, 11:11:09 PM »

I already started a thread for this!

http://www.uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?board=2;action=display;threadid=606

But I'll re-post my picks:

1964: I'd join NH in writing-in Lodge
1968: Rockefeller
1972: Nixon
1976: Ford
1980: Baker
1984: Reagan
1988: Kemp
1992: Bush (although at the time, I was in my "PD phase" and supported Buchannan)
1996: Alexander (although at the time, I was in my "PD phase" and supported Buchannan and Keyes)
2000: McCain
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2004, 12:15:31 AM »

Here are my picks:

1964:  AuH2O all the way  Wink
1968: Nixon
1972: Nixon
1976: Reagan
1980: Reagan
1984: Reagan
1988: Haig  (You have to mix it up every once and a while) Smiley
1992: Bush
1996: Dole
2000: Dole (she was acctually the first one I supported in the primaries)
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2004, 08:18:24 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Ick...
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 06, 2004, 09:01:31 AM »


He could have voted for him in '68 too Smiley
Logged
NHPolitico
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,303


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 06, 2004, 09:52:27 AM »

1968: Reagan
1972: Nixon
1976: Reagan
1980: Reagan
1988: Bush
1992: Bush
1996: Alexander
2000: McCain
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 06, 2004, 04:22:44 PM »

He could have voted for him in '68 too Smiley
I forgot about that.

Reagan actually lost twice ('68 and '76) and won twice ('80 and '84), so Reagan is just as much of a loser as he is a winner.
Logged
TheWildCard
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,529
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 06, 2004, 08:00:25 PM »

Reagan is just as much of a loser as he is a winner.

ummm no not really to me at least theres a big dif. between losing primarie elections and general ones
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 06, 2004, 08:01:51 PM »

Reagan is just as much of a loser as he is a winner.

ummm no not really to me at least theres a big dif. between losing primarie elections and general ones
Reagan would have lost the general in 1968 and 1976 by alot.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 06, 2004, 09:32:37 PM »

Reagan is just as much of a loser as he is a winner.

ummm no not really to me at least theres a big dif. between losing primarie elections and general ones
Reagan would have lost the general in 1968 and 1976 by alot.

Probably yes, though he might have hurt Carter's support in the South.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 07, 2004, 12:06:06 AM »

Reagan is just as much of a loser as he is a winner.

ummm no not really to me at least theres a big dif. between losing primarie elections and general ones
Reagan would have lost the general in 1968 and 1976 by alot.

Probably yes, though he might have hurt Carter's support in the South.

'68 yes

'76 not so sure
Logged
M
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,491


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 07, 2004, 01:50:09 AM »

Reagan-Baker '76
I like the sound of that.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 07, 2004, 08:12:39 AM »

Reagan-Baker '76
I like the sound of that.

It was gonna be Reagan- Schweiker (spelling?), unless I'm mistaken.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 07, 2004, 09:25:19 AM »

Probably yes, though he might have hurt Carter's support in the South.
People weren't going to elect someone as conservative as Reagan until they were in dire staraits, which is what the case was in 1976.  He would have lost like Goldwater in '68, but been respectable in defeat in 1976.
Logged
afcassidy
Rookie
**
Posts: 48


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: August 14, 2004, 02:01:20 AM »


1972: Nixon or maybe Ashbrook
1976: Reagan
1980: Reagan
1984: Reagan
1988: Bush
1992: Buchanan
1996: Forbes
2000: McCain (and I did vote for him, too!)

Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: August 14, 2004, 03:35:20 AM »

1964-Rockefeller
1968-Reagan
1972-Nixon
1976-Reagan
1980-Reagan
1984-Reagan
1988-Kemp
1992-Bush
1996-Forbes
2000-McCain
Logged
Citizen James
James42
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,540


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -2.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: August 14, 2004, 03:41:39 PM »

72: Nixon
76: Ford
80: Anderson
84: Hobson's choice
88: Bush (first primary I was able to vote in)
92: Bush
96: Dole
2000: McCain
Logged
YRABNNRM
YoungRepub
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,680
United States
Political Matrix
E: 0.90, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: August 14, 2004, 03:54:48 PM »

1964-Rockefeller
1968-Rockefeller(Correct me if he didn't run in 68)
1972-Nixon
1976-Reagan
1980-Reagan
1984-Reagan
1988-Probably Bush...not certain though
1992-Bush
1996-No Preference
2000-McCain
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 11 queries.