Bombshell: Bunning threatens to resign to let the Democratic Governor appoint
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 08:11:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Bombshell: Bunning threatens to resign to let the Democratic Governor appoint
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bombshell: Bunning threatens to resign to let the Democratic Governor appoint  (Read 2092 times)
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 27, 2009, 04:49:15 PM »

http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20090227/NEWS01/90227025

WASHINGTON — Already in conflict with his party’s leaders, Sen. Jim Bunning has reportedly said privately that if he is hindered in raising money for his re-election campaign he is ready with a response that would be politically devastating for Senate Republicans: his resignation.

The Kentucky Republican suggested that possible scenario at a campaign fundraiser for him on Capitol Hill earlier this week, according to three sources who asked not to be identified because of the politically sensitive nature of Bunning’s remarks.

The implication, they said, was that Bunning would allow Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear, a Democrat, to appoint his replacement — a move that could give Democrats the 60 votes they need to block Republican filibusters in the Senate.

“I would get the last laugh. Don’t forget Kentucky has a Democrat governor,” one of the sources quoted Bunning as saying.

“The only logical extension of that comment is, ‘(anger) me … enough and I’ll resign, and then you’ve got 60 Democrats,’ ” said another source who was present at the event.

That was the clear message Bunning was sending, said a third source who heard the senator’s remarks at the fundraiser, which attracted about 15 people.

Bunning was touring storm-damaged areas in Western Kentucky today. In a statement made through spokesman Mike Reynard, he said:

It's not true. I intend to fulfill my obligation to the people of Kentucky. If you are going to write something like this, you better make your sources known, because they are lying.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Bunning’s fellow Kentuckian, declined comment, as did Beshear.

Another Democrat in the Senate would bring McConnell to the brink of powerlessness. McConnell’s GOP caucus currently has 41 members, including Bunning — enough to hold up Senate business or block any legislation that needs 60 votes for approval. Without Bunning, the Republicans would be left with 40 senators.

Senate Democrats currently count on 58 votes, including two independents who caucus with them. A Kentucky Democrat would give them 59. And a likely Democratic pickup in Minnesota, once a court challenge to last November’s election results is ended, would give the majority full control with 60 votes.

Bunning has been in a bitter battle with McConnell and Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, over the 2010 Kentucky Senate race.

Bunning wants to run for a third term, but McConnell and Cornyn have sent clear messages that they want Kentucky’s junior senator to stand aside over concerns that he won’t be re-elected.

McConnell said last month that Bunning’s intentions were not known, drawing a blunt protest from Bunning that McConnell had a “lapse of memory” because he had told his Senate leader he was seeking re-election.

Bunning said Tuesday that he did not believe anything Cornyn said and might sue the committee if an opponent were recruited against him in the Republican primary.

Those blasts followed a Bunning gaffe last weekend in which he told a Kentucky audience that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg would die of pancreatic cancer within nine months. He later issued an apology.

Bunning is trying to raise $2 million by the end of March for a race he expects will cost him about $10 million. His most recent campaign filing showed he had about $150,000 in cash on hand at the end of 2008.

At Tuesday’s event, held at National Mining Association headquarters, Bunning told the group that statements by Republican leaders were making it hard for him to raise the money he needs to win a new term, according to sources.

“His statement was that, you know, that his leadership, the Republican leadership … had been saying things that he obviously took great offense at,” one source said.

Bunning’s mention of Kentucky’s Democratic governor was “within that context” of the problems he was having raising money because of Republican leaders.

“Those statements, those actions, obviously were making it much more difficult for him to raise money,” the source said.

“He had made it very, very clear that he was running for re-election while leadership was saying other things, so it was creating confusion that was impacting him,” one source said.

Bunning told the gathering that he had lost only one race where an opponent out-raised him by a 5-1 margin, a reference to the 1983 Kentucky gubernatorial campaign when he lost to Democrat Martha Layne Collins. The sources said the senator added that he had vowed to himself that he would not run another race he couldn’t afford.

Now, if the Senate GOP leadership continued to make it difficult for him to raise money, he would have the “last laugh,” and then added that Kentucky’s governor was a Democrat, a source recalled Bunning saying.

The implication that he would resign was talked about by “several people” after the event, the source said.

The remarks stunned his listeners, the source said.

“Why would he say that?” attendees asked each other, according to the source.

One source said he contacted a Bunning campaign official and warned, “This is going to get out — there were 15 to 20 people who heard this and it’s newsworthy.”

“It’s not because he’s old and senile — he’s always been like that. He’ll tell you what he thinks,” the source said.

But Bunning’s resistance to retirement is “sad to see,” the source said.

“The problem I see with all this media attention is, it just makes him more stubborn rather than make him ready to make a rational decision,” the source said.

Brian Walsh, a spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee, declined comment on the matter.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2009, 04:52:02 PM »

Can't say Bunning doesn't have political instincts. Of course, a non-senile Bunning would have made the threat straight to John Cornyn and Mitch McConnell's faces and behind closed doors.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2009, 04:53:34 PM »

Can't say Bunning doesn't have political instincts. Of course, a non-senile Bunning would have made the threat straight to John Cornyn and Mitch McConnell's faces and behind closed doors.

Maybe he did.  Or maybe he's just trying to float the rumor without the words actually coming out of his mouth.  Or maybe he didn't threaten to do this at all.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,027


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2009, 04:54:13 PM »

What a great guy.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2009, 04:55:05 PM »

Lol, with hindsight I'm so glad Dan Mongiardo lost back in 2004. The entertainment value of Bunning's Farewell Tour is immense.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,790
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2009, 05:12:30 PM »

The spokesman says it's not true, yet everyone else is "no comment"ing. Tongue
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2009, 06:56:24 PM »

Ok, so let's assume it's true...

Bunning loses the primary (his threat will turn more people off than scare them into supporting him. He's proving that he's unstable), resigns, Kentucky has a Democratic U.S. Senator for a few months and the Republican who won the primary takes the seat in January 2011. The worst thing is that the Dems get a 60th seat for half of a year.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2009, 06:59:59 PM »

I suspect that Bunning may have meant to imply that if the GOP establishment doesn't support him they'll be handing the seat to the Democrats in 2010, since he's not going to bow out for some other Republican to run.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2009, 07:18:17 PM »

FF
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2009, 07:59:54 PM »

Ok, so let's assume it's true...

Bunning loses the primary (his threat will turn more people off than scare them into supporting him. He's proving that he's unstable), resigns, Kentucky has a Democratic U.S. Senator for a few months and the Republican who won the primary takes the seat in January 2011. The worst thing is that the Dems get a 60th seat for half of a year.

I'm not sure if that's the best way to interpret it.  Basically I get the impression that he's threatening to resign in the near future unless McConnell and Cornyn let GOP fundraisers contribute to his campaign again.  The GOP would be slightly more likely to gain the seat back 2010 than to successfully hold it with Bunning at the helm, so it's a mixed bag.

I mean, I don't think Bunning will do it, but he's serious about doing everything he can, fighting tooth and nail, to get the GOP's backing.
Logged
The Ex-Factor
xfactor99
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,241
Viet Nam


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2009, 08:59:26 PM »

Oh please god let this happen. There's no law in Kentucky that requires an appointment to be of the same political party, right? Bunning's just given Beshear sufficient justification to be able to appoint a Democrat.

So what do McConnell and Cornyn do? Passive-aggressively support him and work behind the scenes to ensure he loses in the primaries? Call his bluff and tell him to bugger off? Would Bunning be crazy/senile enough to actually do this to end his Senate career?
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,531
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2009, 09:32:34 PM »

Ok, so let's assume it's true...

Bunning loses the primary (his threat will turn more people off than scare them into supporting him. He's proving that he's unstable), resigns, Kentucky has a Democratic U.S. Senator for a few months and the Republican who won the primary takes the seat in January 2011. The worst thing is that the Dems get a 60th seat for half of a year.

I believe that the worst case scenario from a GOP perspective would be that the appointed Democrat gets elected to a full term in 2010.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,686
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 27, 2009, 10:32:25 PM »

I don't know what to say other than "cool".


Cool.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,913


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 27, 2009, 10:45:15 PM »

I'd call that a strikeout for the Republican party if that happened.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 27, 2009, 11:59:52 PM »

Ok, so let's assume it's true...

Bunning loses the primary (his threat will turn more people off than scare them into supporting him. He's proving that he's unstable), resigns, Kentucky has a Democratic U.S. Senator for a few months and the Republican who won the primary takes the seat in January 2011. The worst thing is that the Dems get a 60th seat for half of a year.

I believe that the worst case scenario from a GOP perspective would be that the appointed Democrat gets elected to a full term in 2010.

That's my point. I'm saying the worst case about Bunning getting a challenge is him possibly resigning and they get the seat for a few months. The absolute worst case would be letting him win the primary and giving the Dems a great chance at a pickup.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 28, 2009, 01:08:58 AM »

Ok, so let's assume it's true...

Bunning loses the primary (his threat will turn more people off than scare them into supporting him. He's proving that he's unstable), resigns, Kentucky has a Democratic U.S. Senator for a few months and the Republican who won the primary takes the seat in January 2011. The worst thing is that the Dems get a 60th seat for half of a year.

I believe that the worst case scenario from a GOP perspective would be that the appointed Democrat gets elected to a full term in 2010.

That's my point. I'm saying the worst case about Bunning getting a challenge is him possibly resigning and they get the seat for a few months. The absolute worst case would be letting him win the primary and giving the Dems a great chance at a pickup.

But the Republicans are not guaranteed to win the seat back from an appointed Democrat by any means. Beshear would probably appoint either Lunsford or Mongiardo, both of whom would be strong candidates, but the Republicans may well end up stuck re-running Northup, who would lose. Again. (Certainly the Republican candidate in the case of a Bunning resignation would be a handpicked McConnell choice, probably Northup.)
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 28, 2009, 01:10:35 AM »

Ok, so let's assume it's true...

Bunning loses the primary (his threat will turn more people off than scare them into supporting him. He's proving that he's unstable), resigns, Kentucky has a Democratic U.S. Senator for a few months and the Republican who won the primary takes the seat in January 2011. The worst thing is that the Dems get a 60th seat for half of a year.

I believe that the worst case scenario from a GOP perspective would be that the appointed Democrat gets elected to a full term in 2010.

That's my point. I'm saying the worst case about Bunning getting a challenge is him possibly resigning and they get the seat for a few months. The absolute worst case would be letting him win the primary and giving the Dems a great chance at a pickup.

But the Republicans are not guaranteed to win the seat back from an appointed Democrat by any means. Beshear would probably appoint either Lunsford or Mongiardo, both of whom would be strong candidates, but the Republicans may well end up stuck re-running Northup, who would lose. Again.

I'm not saying that we're guaranteed to win but I think we'd be favored and I doubt Northup has much of a future down there.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 28, 2009, 01:15:21 AM »

Ok, so let's assume it's true...

Bunning loses the primary (his threat will turn more people off than scare them into supporting him. He's proving that he's unstable), resigns, Kentucky has a Democratic U.S. Senator for a few months and the Republican who won the primary takes the seat in January 2011. The worst thing is that the Dems get a 60th seat for half of a year.

I believe that the worst case scenario from a GOP perspective would be that the appointed Democrat gets elected to a full term in 2010.

That's my point. I'm saying the worst case about Bunning getting a challenge is him possibly resigning and they get the seat for a few months. The absolute worst case would be letting him win the primary and giving the Dems a great chance at a pickup.

But the Republicans are not guaranteed to win the seat back from an appointed Democrat by any means. Beshear would probably appoint either Lunsford or Mongiardo, both of whom would be strong candidates, but the Republicans may well end up stuck re-running Northup, who would lose. Again. (Certainly the Republican candidate in the case of a Bunning resignation would be a handpicked McConnell choice, probably Northup.)

Whoah.  The GOP would basically be 75% or more likely to nominate Secretary of State Grayson, a young rising star whom much of the KY GOP puts their hope in for the future.

No chance of Lunsford being named, he's just a generic businessman.  The greatest pressure would be for the governor to nominate Jack Conway, the Democrat's own rising star.   The Gov doesn't have a real working relationship with Mongiardo, I think Mongiardo was something like his third choice for running mates.  But Mongiardo is a def. possibility along with Crit Luallen.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.243 seconds with 10 queries.