McCain & The Raging Right -- Dionne
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 14, 2024, 02:15:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  McCain & The Raging Right -- Dionne
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: McCain & The Raging Right -- Dionne  (Read 589 times)
JSojourner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,531
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 14, 2008, 12:06:32 PM »

Dionne hits it, more or less, out of the park...

washingtonpost.com

McCain and the Raging Right

By E. J. Dionne Jr.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008;

Are we witnessing the reemergence of the far right as a power in American politics? Has John McCain, inadvertently perhaps, become the midwife of a new movement built around fear, xenophobia, racism and anger?

McCain has clearly become uneasy with some of the forces that have gathered around him. He has begun to insist, against the sometimes loud protests from his crowds, that Barack Obama is, among things, a "decent person."

Yet McCain's own campaign is playing with powerful extremist themes to denigrate Obama. When his running mate, Sarah Palin, first brought up Obama's association with 1960s radical Bill Ayers, who has become a centerpiece of McCain's attacks, she accused Obama of "palling around with terrorists." What other "terrorists" was she thinking about?

Since Obama was a child when Ayers was part of the Weather Underground, and since even Republicans have served on boards with Ayers, this is classic guilt by association.

Ayers has been dragged into this campaign because there is a deep frustration on the right with Obama's enthusiasm for shutting down the culture wars of the 1960s.

Precisely because Obama is not a baby boomer, he carries none of that generation's scars. Most Americans (including most boomers) are weary of living in the past and reprising the 1960s every four years.

Yet culture war politics is relatively mild compared with the far-right appeals that are emerging this year. It is as if McCain's loyalists overshot the '60s and went back to the '50s or even the '30s.

What we are witnessing is the mainstreaming of the far right, a phenomenon that began to take shape with some of the earliest attacks on Bill Clinton in the 1990s.

False claims that Obama is Muslim, that he trained to overthrow the government and that he was educated in Wahhabi schools are a standard part of the political discussion. These fake stories come from voices on the ultra right that have dabbled in other forms of conspiracy, including classic anti-Semitism. McCain and his campaign do not pick up the most extreme charges. They just fan the flames by suggesting that voters don't really know who Obama is, hinting at a sinister back story without filling in the details. That is left to the voters' imaginations.

The tragic irony here is that McCain was the victim of some of the very same extremist forces in the 2000 South Carolina primary.

To bring McCain down, some of George W. Bush's supporters on the far right peddled all manner of falsehoods about McCain, raising despicable charges about his time as a POW and suggesting (again falsely) that he had fathered an illegitimate child of color. In the past, McCain publicly condemned some of the very people who are now going after Obama.

McCain cannot be blamed for all of the crazies who see in Obama a chance to earn fame and fortune by concocting lies about him. And yes, we should defend the speech rights even of those whose views we find abhorrent.

But the angry McCain-Palin crowds, and particularly those who threaten violence or shout racist epithets, should be a wake-up call to McCain. The dark hints about Obama that McCain's campaign is dropping dovetail too nicely with the nasty trash floating around the Internet and the airwaves.

We are in the midst of what could become -- and here's hoping it doesn't -- the worst economic downturn in decades. The last thing we need is a campaign that strengthens fanaticism, tarnishes the authority of the next president and whips up the worst kinds of prejudice. This works both ways: Obama should not be delegitimized if he wins, and McCain should not want to win in a way that would undermine his own capacity to lead.

When Christopher Buckley, a novelist and former speechwriter for George H.W. Bush, announced last week that he would vote for Obama (his first vote ever for a Democrat), he referred to words once spoken to him by his late father. "You know," the conservative hero William F. Buckley Jr. said, "I've spent my entire lifetime separating the right from the kooks."

McCain has an obligation, to his own legacy and the country he has served, to separate himself and his campaign from the kooks. Extremism in defense of liberty may be no vice, but extremism in pursuit of the presidency is as dysfunctional as it is degrading.

postchat@aol.com

© 2008 The Washington Post Company
Logged
cannonia
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 960
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.42, S: -1.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2008, 12:30:18 PM »

Dionne predictably equates all conservatives with extremists.  That column is all smear, no substance.
Logged
JSojourner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,531
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2008, 04:54:13 PM »

Dionne predictably equates all conservatives with extremists.  That column is all smear, no substance.

That's so completely NOT the point.  Buckley is the point.  And Will.  And Ford, Bush Senior, Eisenhower, Landon, Dole, Lugar, and all the aging conservatives and moderates.  There are none left.  That's Buckley's subtle point.  They are dead, dying or retired.  Or completely shuffled to the margins.

And Dionne is 100% right in saying THAT is the Republican Party that could be reasoned with. 

What will be left in ten years...when Lugar and Cochran and Snowe and Smith are gone?

DeMint and Coburn and Inhofe.  And they, my friend, ARE extremists. 
Logged
Storebought
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 14, 2008, 08:44:12 PM »

I find this column over-the-top offensive, if just for this line:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

As if the Democrats haven't spent the last 7+ years gleefully delegitimizing Bush, flying off to foreign dictatorships to denounce the American presidency, and comparing the man to a Nazi and a monkey and all else while doing it.

Hell, Democrats made a movie about the man's assassination while he's still in office. But to Dionne's mind, that doesn't strengthen fanaticism at all, now does it?

And then Dionne has the cheek to demand that McCain, if he can't force himself to lose for the good of the country, should win in a way (how does that work? you play politics to win) that doesn't hurt Obama's feelings?

This article has nothing at all to do with "Republican extremism." The GOP nominated the establishment McCain over the evangelical Huckabee in winner-take-all primaries; leftwing Democrats selected Obama in a series of closed-door party caucuses organized by leftists themselves. It does have everything to do with silencing that large minority of Americans who mistrust both the person and the politics of Obama and his cabal and are willing to tolerate unpopularity voicing that opposition in public.

His (and the original poster's) desire to see go-along-to-get-along Nancy Kassebaum Republicans in the RNC and Congress only amounts to having the opposition shut up -- for the good of the country.
Logged
JSojourner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,531
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2008, 03:56:00 PM »

I find this column over-the-top offensive, if just for this line:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

As if the Democrats haven't spent the last 7+ years gleefully delegitimizing Bush, flying off to foreign dictatorships to denounce the American presidency, and comparing the man to a Nazi and a monkey and all else while doing it.  Which Democratic Senators or House members have compared Bush to a Nazi?  Which ones have denounced Bush on foreign soil?  Cite, please.

Hell, Democrats made a movie about the man's assassination while he's still in office. But to Dionne's mind, that doesn't strengthen fanaticism at all, now does it? 

Democrats made the movie?  I didn't know the DSCC had an office in Hollyweird.  I know Michael Medved and James Dobson think so, so I guess it must be true...

And then Dionne has the cheek to demand that McCain, if he can't force himself to lose for the good of the country, should win in a way (how does that work? you play politics to win) that doesn't hurt Obama's feelings?

I think Dionne is simply reminding America that the John McCain they once knew is starting to act like his old self again.  Whether or not he regrets getting between the sheets with the same people who accused him of fathering a black baby out of wedlock in South Carolina is anybody's guess.

This article has nothing at all to do with "Republican extremism." The GOP nominated the establishment McCain over the evangelical Huckabee in winner-take-all primaries; leftwing Democrats selected Obama in a series of closed-door party caucuses organized by leftists themselves. It does have everything to do with silencing that large minority of Americans who mistrust both the person and the politics of Obama and his cabal and are willing to tolerate unpopularity voicing that opposition in public.

Would that be the same large minority that put ultra conservative Republicans in control of both chambers from 1994 until 2006?  And are you not seeing anything wrong with the "kill him" or "terrorist" mantra?  Ever to his credit, Senator McCain is being principled and firm in condemning such hate speech.  Just another reason I like the man.  I'm not sure what you want -- a McCain who joins in the chant or a McCain who acts like a statesman.

His (and the original poster's) desire to see go-along-to-get-along Nancy Kassebaum Republicans in the RNC and Congress only amounts to having the opposition shut up -- for the good of the country.

Nancy Kassebaum was no shrinking violet when it came to criticising Democrats.  But you're right, she was a moderate and quite capable of compromising.  For example, you can have a highway bill worked on by both parties.  Or none at all.  You pick.  But I'm not just pining for the days of liberal or moderate Republicans.  Brother, that ship has sailed.  I'd be perfectly content with a minority of conservative Republicans...who aren't mouth breathing, tongues speaking, race-baiting homophobes.  Call me crazy, but what's wrong with Thad Cochran or Chuck Grassley?
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2008, 05:07:56 PM »

I honestly think that if McCain loses, you are looking at the future of America.  The "kooks" could very easily become the dominant force in American politics.
Logged
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,808
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2008, 05:30:07 PM »

When Christopher Buckley, a novelist and former speechwriter for George H.W. Bush, announced last week that he would vote for Obama (his first vote ever for a Democrat), he referred to words once spoken to him by his late father. "You know," the conservative hero William F. Buckley Jr. said, "I've spent my entire lifetime separating the right from the kooks."
Ha, what is the right without the kooks?  Has the right ever had a winning coalition without the assistance of some demagogic or prejudiced kooks?
Logged
ChrisFromNJ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,742


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: -8.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2008, 05:36:46 PM »
« Edited: October 15, 2008, 06:02:48 PM by You are a Gentleman and a Scholar »

I honestly think that if McCain loses, you are looking at the future of America.  The "kooks" could very easily become the dominant force in American politics.

What the hell are you talking about?

You really are delusional. The kooks have been the dominate force in American politics for 28 years!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.227 seconds with 10 queries.