McCain interview in Portland, Maine
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 04:39:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  McCain interview in Portland, Maine
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: McCain interview in Portland, Maine  (Read 1269 times)
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,048


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 11, 2008, 08:31:43 PM »

McCain takes aggressive questions about Sarah Palin in a local tv news interview. Awkward. The video is labeled 207 John McCain interview.

http://www.wcsh6.com/video/default.aspx?maven_playerId=immersiveplayer&maven_referralObject=850878100
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2008, 10:27:04 PM »

I love how whenever anyone asks about Palin's national security experience they bring up energy.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2008, 10:32:41 PM »

I love how whenever anyone asks about Palin's national security experience they bring up energy.

Energy has something to do with national security?  Well, Barack Obama thinks so, too:
Energy Security is National Security
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,460


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 11, 2008, 10:51:31 PM »

I love how whenever anyone asks about Palin's national security experience they bring up energy.

Energy has something to do with national security?  Well, Barack Obama thinks so, too:
Energy Security is National Security

The difference is one focuses on getting AWAY from oil, while the other doesn't.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 11, 2008, 10:53:44 PM »

I love how whenever anyone asks about Palin's national security experience they bring up energy.

Energy has something to do with national security?  Well, Barack Obama thinks so, too:
Energy Security is National Security

It is a part of it and I am not denying it but when you say national security you mean Afghanistan, Al qaeda, Iraq,Iran and all the other crazies out there. She has no experience in those affairs at all and they keep running away from it.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 11, 2008, 10:56:42 PM »

I love how whenever anyone asks about Palin's national security experience they bring up energy.

Energy has something to do with national security?  Well, Barack Obama thinks so, too:
Energy Security is National Security

The difference is one focuses on getting AWAY from oil, while the other doesn't.

One has a pie-in-the-sky solution where fossil fuel alternatives magically appear overnight.  The other realistically knows that's not going to happen.  One doesn't believe in nuclear energy.  The other does.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 11, 2008, 10:59:43 PM »
« Edited: September 11, 2008, 11:52:43 PM by cinyc »

I love how whenever anyone asks about Palin's national security experience they bring up energy.

Energy has something to do with national security?  Well, Barack Obama thinks so, too:
Energy Security is National Security

It is a part of it and I am not denying it but when you say national security you mean Afghanistan, Al qaeda, Iraq,Iran and all the other crazies out there. She has no experience in those affairs at all and they keep running away from it.

She visited Alaska National Guard troops who were being deployed in Iraq long before Barack Obama did.  She has a son who will be deployed in Iraq.  She's negotiated an oil gas pipeline deal with Canadian companies.  She's met trade delegations and the Premier of Yukon.

What was Bill Clinton's foreign policy experience before he became President?   
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 11, 2008, 11:06:20 PM »

I love how whenever anyone asks about Palin's national security experience they bring up energy.

Energy has something to do with national security?  Well, Barack Obama thinks so, too:
Energy Security is National Security

It is a part of it and I am not denying it but when you say national security you mean Afghanistan, Al qaeda, Iraq,Iran and all the other crazies out there. She has no experience in those affairs at all and they keep running away from it.

She visited Alaska National Guard troops who were being deployed in Iraq long before Barack Obama did.  She has a son who will be deployed in Iraq.  She's negotiated an oil deal with Canadian companies.  She's met trade delegations and the Premier of Yukon.

What was Bill Clinton's foreign policy experience before he became President?   

First of all negotiating oil deals and having meetings with canadians does not equal national security. My problem isn't so much that she doesn't have national security experience but rather how they automatically start talking about energy policy if asked about her experience. Actually its not even a problem, just damn hilarious.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 12, 2008, 12:14:27 AM »

First of all negotiating oil deals and having meetings with canadians does not equal national security. My problem isn't so much that she doesn't have national security experience but rather how they automatically start talking about energy policy if asked about her experience. Actually its not even a problem, just damn hilarious.

It's hilarious until you realize that your candidate agrees energy security is national security, too.  Then it ceases to be funny to anyone who understands logic.

Stop treating Alaska like it's some backwater.  There are consulates in Anchorage - including year-round consulates from South Korea, Japan and Canada.  Sarah Palin has met with consuls from South Korea, CanadaChina, Russia many other countries

Is this large-scale stuff?  No.  But to claim Governor Palin has no foreign policy experience is nonsense.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 12, 2008, 12:17:54 AM »

First of all negotiating oil deals and having meetings with canadians does not equal national security. My problem isn't so much that she doesn't have national security experience but rather how they automatically start talking about energy policy if asked about her experience. Actually its not even a problem, just damn hilarious.

It's hilarious until you realize that your candidate agrees energy security is national security, too.  Then it ceases to be funny to anyone who understands logic.

Stop treating Alaska like it's some backwater.  There are consulates in Anchorage - including year-round consulates from South Korea, Japan and Canada.  Sarah Palin has met with consuls from South Korea, CanadaChina, Russia many other countries

Is this large-scale stuff?  No.  But to claim Governor Palin has no foreign policy experience is nonsense.

What I find funny is how they dodge questions about Palin's national security experience. I am not knocking it but why the deception? Why don't they use the same argument you are using now? And considering I have been to Alaska and I will assume you haven't, I totally understand they are not a backwater. A lot of this world's trade actually goes through the port and airport of Anchorage.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 12, 2008, 12:30:05 AM »

First of all negotiating oil deals and having meetings with canadians does not equal national security. My problem isn't so much that she doesn't have national security experience but rather how they automatically start talking about energy policy if asked about her experience. Actually its not even a problem, just damn hilarious.

It's hilarious until you realize that your candidate agrees energy security is national security, too.  Then it ceases to be funny to anyone who understands logic.

Stop treating Alaska like it's some backwater.  There are consulates in Anchorage - including year-round consulates from South Korea, Japan and Canada.  Sarah Palin has met with consuls from South Korea, CanadaChina, Russia many other countries

Is this large-scale stuff?  No.  But to claim Governor Palin has no foreign policy experience is nonsense.

What I find funny is how they dodge questions about Palin's national security experience. I am not knocking it but why the deception? Why don't they use the same argument you are using now? And considering I have been to Alaska and I will assume you haven't, I totally understand they are not a backwater. A lot of this world's trade actually goes through the port and airport of Anchorage.

Sarah Palin did.  Her first answer to the question of whether she met with foreign heads of state was cut out of the World News Tonight edit.  It was included in the Nightline edit.  She said she met with trade delegations from other countries.  Charlie Gibson cut her off and asked again, have you met with any heads of state?  She said no, but I bet if you asked other Vice Presidential candidates in the past the same question, they'd have the same response.  And she's right about that.
 
She's not dodging questions about her national security experience.  Your own candidate agrees that energy security is national security.   As Governor of Alaska AND Chairman of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Board (a job Democrats conveniently drop from Palin's resume), she knows more about energy policy than Obama, Biden and McCain combined.  Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if she could tell you exactly how they get oil out of the ground in Alaska.  Her husband sure knows. 

Sarah Palin still is the commander-in-chief of the Alaska Army and Air National Guard (when not nationalized) - one more army and air force unit than Barack Obama has ever commanded.  And she went to visit her troops overseas when they were nationalized - well before Barack Obama ever visited the Iraqi theater.

Don't assume anything.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 12, 2008, 12:36:46 AM »

First of all negotiating oil deals and having meetings with canadians does not equal national security. My problem isn't so much that she doesn't have national security experience but rather how they automatically start talking about energy policy if asked about her experience. Actually its not even a problem, just damn hilarious.

It's hilarious until you realize that your candidate agrees energy security is national security, too.  Then it ceases to be funny to anyone who understands logic.

Stop treating Alaska like it's some backwater.  There are consulates in Anchorage - including year-round consulates from South Korea, Japan and Canada.  Sarah Palin has met with consuls from South Korea, CanadaChina, Russia many other countries

Is this large-scale stuff?  No.  But to claim Governor Palin has no foreign policy experience is nonsense.

What I find funny is how they dodge questions about Palin's national security experience. I am not knocking it but why the deception? Why don't they use the same argument you are using now? And considering I have been to Alaska and I will assume you haven't, I totally understand they are not a backwater. A lot of this world's trade actually goes through the port and airport of Anchorage.

Sarah Palin did.  Her first answer to the question of whether she met with foreign heads of state was cut out of the World News Tonight edit.  It was included in the Nightline edit.  She said she met with trade delegations from other countries.  Charlie Gibson cut her off and asked again, have you met with any heads of state?  She said no, but I bet if you asked other Vice Presidential candidates in the past the same question, they'd have the same response.  And she's right about that.
 
She's not dodging questions about her national security experience.  Your own candidate agrees that energy security is national security.   As Governor of Alaska AND Chairman of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Board (a job Democrats conveniently drop from Palin's resume), she knows more about energy policy than Obama, Biden and McCain combined.  Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if she could tell you exactly how they get oil out of the ground in Alaska.  Her husband sure knows. 

Sarah Palin still is the commander-in-chief of the Alaska Army and Air National Guard (when not nationalized) - one more army and air force unit than Barack Obama has ever commanded.  And she went to visit her troops overseas when they were nationalized - well before Barack Obama ever visited the Iraqi theater.

Don't assume anything.


Well I was talking more about the dodge Mccain made in this interview. I actually haven't seen the ABC interview yet. Link?
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 12, 2008, 12:41:53 AM »

Well I was talking more about the dodge Mccain made in this interview. I actually haven't seen the ABC interview yet. Link?

Some of the World News Tonight interview is here.  I haven't checked to see if it exactly matches what I saw on the newscast (and probably wouldn't remember anyway).  I don't think the Nightline interview video is online yet - but Nightline hasn't been broadcast on the West Coast yet, either.
Logged
Zarn
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 12, 2008, 05:41:04 AM »

I love how whenever anyone asks about Palin's national security experience they bring up energy.

Energy has something to do with national security?  Well, Barack Obama thinks so, too:
Energy Security is National Security

The difference is one focuses on getting AWAY from oil, while the other doesn't.

One ticket focuses on using multiple solutions (mid and long term), while the other relies on improved technology alone (long term only).
Logged
JSojourner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,514
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 12, 2008, 03:00:16 PM »

I love how whenever anyone asks about Palin's national security experience they bring up energy.

Energy has something to do with national security?  Well, Barack Obama thinks so, too:
Energy Security is National Security

The difference is one focuses on getting AWAY from oil, while the other doesn't.

One has a pie-in-the-sky solution where fossil fuel alternatives magically appear overnight.  The other realistically knows that's not going to happen.  One doesn't believe in nuclear energy.  The other does.

This is where I am really stuck in a middle ground.  I oppose drilling.  And yeah, I am all for the various experiments with wind, solar, ethanol, etc.  But nuclear...I think I can deal with nuclear.  We might need to actually ask the French and the Swedes for some tips -- and I would want to be certain our waste was secure.  But I'm open to expanding our nuclear power system.  LOL -- I might want it federalized (you knew you could depend on me!) but it warrants consideration.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.249 seconds with 13 queries.