U.S. Demographic maps II
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 06:51:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  U.S. Demographic maps II
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: U.S. Demographic maps II  (Read 4897 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,975
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 28, 2007, 08:31:44 PM »
« edited: March 15, 2007, 08:41:09 PM by Sibboleth »

Union membership by state:



Figures are from 2006.

If current trends continue then North and South Carolina will actually be more unionised than Texas and Georgia.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2007, 05:43:29 AM »

Not surprising in the least
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,530
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2007, 05:16:28 AM »

Why does Alaska vote Republican if it is supposedly so unionized.  I was under the impression that they were not huge social conservatives so I always assumed they were voting on fiscal issues.  Is it b/c of ANWR and other environment related issues?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2007, 06:18:28 AM »

Why does Alaska vote Republican if it is supposedly so unionized.  I was under the impression that they were not huge social conservatives so I always assumed they were voting on fiscal issues.  Is it b/c of ANWR and other environment related issues?

That, and oil in general.  Gun stuff doesn't help the Democrats either.  (I don't know so much beyond that.)
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2007, 12:02:03 AM »

Why does Alaska vote Republican if it is supposedly so unionized.  I was under the impression that they were not huge social conservatives so I always assumed they were voting on fiscal issues.  Is it b/c of ANWR and other environment related issues?

That, and oil in general.  Gun stuff doesn't help the Democrats either.  (I don't know so much beyond that.)

I think that's more or less it. Each resident of Alaska gets a subsidy from the state from oil profits, a policy started by Republicans that has made them wildly popular there.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2007, 06:29:58 AM »

Why does Alaska vote Republican if it is supposedly so unionized.  I was under the impression that they were not huge social conservatives so I always assumed they were voting on fiscal issues.  Is it b/c of ANWR and other environment related issues?
There is a strong social conservative presence as well.
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,530
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2007, 04:27:33 AM »

Why does Alaska vote Republican if it is supposedly so unionized.  I was under the impression that they were not huge social conservatives so I always assumed they were voting on fiscal issues.  Is it b/c of ANWR and other environment related issues?
There is a strong social conservative presence as well.

Really?  Perhaps this is just media portrayal but I was fairly certain that religion is hard to come by in such a vast and sparsely populated state.  Aren't most Alaskans a little more socially libertarian?
Logged
Smash255
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,464


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2007, 04:36:34 AM »

Why does Alaska vote Republican if it is supposedly so unionized.  I was under the impression that they were not huge social conservatives so I always assumed they were voting on fiscal issues.  Is it b/c of ANWR and other environment related issues?
There is a strong social conservative presence as well.

Really?  Perhaps this is just media portrayal but I was fairly certain that religion is hard to come by in such a vast and sparsely populated state.  Aren't most Alaskans a little more socially libertarian?

Yes, its really not socially conservative. 
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 05, 2007, 12:28:45 PM »

Why does Alaska vote Republican if it is supposedly so unionized.  I was under the impression that they were not huge social conservatives so I always assumed they were voting on fiscal issues.  Is it b/c of ANWR and other environment related issues?
There is a strong social conservative presence as well.

Really?  Perhaps this is just media portrayal but I was fairly certain that religion is hard to come by in such a vast and sparsely populated state.  Aren't most Alaskans a little more socially libertarian?

Yes, its really not socially conservative. 
There's both a large social conservative element, and a large small-l libertarian conservative element, and given Republican dominance in state politics, that makes for interesting primary battles at times. -_-
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,975
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 06, 2007, 05:46:08 PM »

% employed in manufacturing (2000 census)...

Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,824


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 06, 2007, 09:11:27 PM »

% employed in manufacturing (2000 census)...



The effect of non-manufacturing unions is apparent in a state like NV (and AK and HI).
Logged
RBH
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,233


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 06, 2007, 10:54:30 PM »

Does Nevada have a labor force other than miners?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 06, 2007, 11:43:46 PM »

Does Nevada have a labor force other than miners?

Entertainment employees?
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 21, 2007, 04:03:22 PM »
« Edited: March 21, 2007, 04:05:29 PM by Supersoulty »

Why does Alaska vote Republican if it is supposedly so unionized.  I was under the impression that they were not huge social conservatives so I always assumed they were voting on fiscal issues.  Is it b/c of ANWR and other environment related issues?

Not everyone who is in a union wants to be in a union.  I was in a union once... biggest waste of my $10/week in my life.

Hell, I even protested it with managment who said that they would have no choice but to fire me, since they couldn't afford the actions the union would take against them (or me) if they had non-unionized employees.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,975
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 21, 2007, 04:55:47 PM »

Not everyone who is in a union wants to be in a union. 

True as far as some states go, but you have to be careful about assuming that it has a big impact on union density in a given area; Nevada and Iowa are both "right to work" states, while neither Colorado nor New Mexico are. And fact that most of the South is "right to work" isn't the reason for the weakness of unions there; more like the other way round.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,975
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 22, 2007, 04:27:03 PM »

The following map is designed to give an indication of how working class a given area is; the variables are mainly occupation and housing tenure, but I also added a couple of other bits and bobs to make sure that the index isn't tilted too far towards urban areas (which, given the tendency for occupation statistics to tilt the other way, is somewhat ironic).
The numbers aren't %'s, they're scores. Note that most states (and state level is a very poor level to map this sort of thing; expect maps at lower level to be made soon) were either in the high '30's/low '40's or in the high '40's/low 50's, although there were exceptions to that (Maryland, West Virginia and Nevada for example).



Still, this is very much work in progress.
Logged
Undisguised Sockpuppet
Straha
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 6.52, S: 2.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 22, 2007, 05:26:19 PM »

Wow so NY is down there with MS, SC and WV.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 27, 2007, 08:44:38 PM »

Not everyone who is in a union wants to be in a union. 

True as far as some states go, but you have to be careful about assuming that it has a big impact on union density in a given area; Nevada and Iowa are both "right to work" states, while neither Colorado nor New Mexico are. And fact that most of the South is "right to work" isn't the reason for the weakness of unions there; more like the other way round.

Very true.

Plus, the opposite is also true; not everyone who isn't in a union doesn't want to be in one. I'd say it at least balances itself out if not moreso.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 27, 2007, 08:58:08 PM »

Why does Alaska vote Republican if it is supposedly so unionized.  I was under the impression that they were not huge social conservatives so I always assumed they were voting on fiscal issues.  Is it b/c of ANWR and other environment related issues?

That, and oil in general.  Gun stuff doesn't help the Democrats either.  (I don't know so much beyond that.)

I think that's more or less it. Each resident of Alaska gets a subsidy from the state from oil profits, a policy started by Republicans that has made them wildly popular there.

Wait, so they effectively get bribed en masse to vote Republican?

Well, I guess it worked. Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.232 seconds with 10 queries.