Describe a Dukakis '88-Bush '92 voter
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 07:46:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Describe a Dukakis '88-Bush '92 voter
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Describe a Dukakis '88-Bush '92 voter  (Read 812 times)
King of Kensington
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,047


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 01, 2023, 08:08:39 PM »

Besides some Greek American conservatives.
Logged
Blow by blow, the passion dies
LeonelBrizola
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,517
Brazil


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2023, 08:56:23 PM »

Iowa farmer who got out of the farm crisis.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,989
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2023, 10:12:46 AM »

A liberal veteran who thought Clinton's issues with cheating on his wife and lack of military service were disqualifying.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,513
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2023, 12:53:18 PM »

Against the death penalty and strongly disapproves of cheating on one’s wife.
Logged
MarkD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,264
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2023, 12:32:37 AM »

Me.

In 1988, I was thinking almost exclusively about the case of Bowers v. Hardwick, and how much I wanted to see that decision overturned. I voted for a liberal President because, at that time, I wanted the Supreme Court to turn a little bit more liberal. But in 1989 I decided that I would be more ideologically in tune with the GOP, and I started studying more about constitutional law, to determine whether Bowers truly deserved to be overturned. By 1992, I had learned enough about con law to realize that the Court's conclusion was correct, it shouldn't be overturned - like I had been hoping for, for the wrong reason - and I decided that Republican Presidents like Bush were more likely to appoint Originalists (and so were not likely to overturn Bowers).

But after the 2000 election - because of Bush v. Gore - I decided that the Republican-appointed Supreme Court Justices were no better than the Democratic-appointed ones. The Bush decision caused me to feel extremely pessimistic and hopeless, and it made me decide that I didn't want to vote ever again. I didn't vote any over a dozen years after I made that decision.
Logged
Fuzzy Bear Loves Christian Missionaries
Fuzzy Bear
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,985
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2023, 03:36:41 PM »

One of several types:

1.  A person who got Saved in between the elections and found Bush's positions on abortion more consistent with new-found Christian faith (who was likely attending a Charismatic or Pentacostal Church).

2.  A genuinely independent voter who was won over by the fact that the Cold War ended successfully during the Bush years, and who supported Bush's Foreign Policy successes.

3.  A conservative Greek who cast a vote for Dukakis out of a sense of ethnic loyalty/pride.
Logged
Yu748Girl83
Rookie
**
Posts: 149
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2023, 08:13:18 PM »

Me.

In 1988, I was thinking almost exclusively about the case of Bowers v. Hardwick, and how much I wanted to see that decision overturned. I voted for a liberal President because, at that time, I wanted the Supreme Court to turn a little bit more liberal. But in 1989 I decided that I would be more ideologically in tune with the GOP, and I started studying more about constitutional law, to determine whether Bowers truly deserved to be overturned. By 1992, I had learned enough about con law to realize that the Court's conclusion was correct, it shouldn't be overturned - like I had been hoping for, for the wrong reason - and I decided that Republican Presidents like Bush were more likely to appoint Originalists (and so were not likely to overturn Bowers).

But after the 2000 election - because of Bush v. Gore - I decided that the Republican-appointed Supreme Court Justices were no better than the Democratic-appointed ones. The Bush decision caused me to feel extremely pessimistic and hopeless, and it made me decide that I didn't want to vote ever again. I didn't vote any over a dozen years after I made that decision.
I may be biased since I think Bowers v. Hardwick was an awful decision, but what do you mean?
Logged
VirginiaAaron
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 560
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -3.44

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2023, 09:57:02 PM »

Bruce Willis

"In 1988, Willis and then-wife Demi Moore campaigned for Democratic Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis's Presidential bid. Four years later, he supported President George H. W. Bush for reelection and was an outspoken critic of Bill Clinton"
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.224 seconds with 11 queries.