TX CWS Research: Trump 37, DeSantis 34, Pence 5, Haley 4, Cruz 3, Pompeo 2, Scott 1
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 05:18:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  2024 U.S. Presidential Election
  2024 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, GeorgiaModerate, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  TX CWS Research: Trump 37, DeSantis 34, Pence 5, Haley 4, Cruz 3, Pompeo 2, Scott 1		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: TX CWS Research: Trump 37, DeSantis 34, Pence 5, Haley 4, Cruz 3, Pompeo 2, Scott 1  (Read 377 times)
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,976
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 12, 2022, 10:51:09 AM »
« edited: December 12, 2022, 10:56:51 AM by Sir Mohamed 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 »


LOL Cruz.
Logged
TimeUnit2027
Rookie
**
Posts: 156
British Indian Ocean Territory


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2022, 02:27:46 PM »
If Trump is within margin of error in TX which he lose quite big in 2016 it means Trump renominated easily...
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,327
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2022, 02:33:11 PM »
Quote from: TimeUnit2027 on December 12, 2022, 02:27:46 PM
If Trump is within margin of error in TX which he lose quite big in 2016 it means Trump renominated easily...

Not necessarily. In 2016, Trump was just a media figure and "businessman" running in a crowded field of political insiders. Now he's a former president. Margins and results don't always mean the same, sometimes its just perception and expectations. A result like this would be poor for him.

Cruz at 3% is beyond comical, though that's still better than Rubio at 0% in a latest Florida poll.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,251
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2022, 04:53:38 PM »
Quote from: TimeUnit2027 on December 12, 2022, 02:27:46 PM
If Trump is within margin of error in TX which he lose quite big in 2016 it means Trump renominated easily...

Except in 2024 Trump will be the stablishment guy with a hard ceiling. And his biggest rival won’t be a Senator from Texas this time.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,809
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2022, 05:45:28 PM »
Quote from: Tekken_Guy on December 12, 2022, 04:53:38 PM
Quote from: TimeUnit2027 on December 12, 2022, 02:27:46 PM
If Trump is within margin of error in TX which he lose quite big in 2016 it means Trump renominated easily...

Except in 2024 Trump will be the stablishment guy with a hard ceiling. And his biggest rival won’t be a Senator from Texas this time.

Ehhh... I still think if Trump wins TX, he wins the nomination, so this is a reasonably good poll for him.  However, assuming a field that large into March with 2 minor establishment candidates taking 9% of the vote and a Texas senator taking 3% seems unlikely. 
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,251
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2022, 05:49:13 PM »
Quote from: Skill and Chance on December 12, 2022, 05:45:28 PM
Quote from: Tekken_Guy on December 12, 2022, 04:53:38 PM
Quote from: TimeUnit2027 on December 12, 2022, 02:27:46 PM
If Trump is within margin of error in TX which he lose quite big in 2016 it means Trump renominated easily...

Except in 2024 Trump will be the stablishment guy with a hard ceiling. And his biggest rival won’t be a Senator from Texas this time.

Ehhh... I still think if Trump wins TX, he wins the nomination, so this is a reasonably good poll for him.  However, assuming a field that large into March with 2 minor establishment candidates taking 9% of the vote and a Texas senator taking 3% seems unlikely. 

That’s my point. He’s barely leading the hot new prospect of the GOP despite being the face of the party for almost a decade now.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.216 seconds with 13 queries.