100% Solar community in Florida survives Ian with minimal damage
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 01:28:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  100% Solar community in Florida survives Ian with minimal damage
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 100% Solar community in Florida survives Ian with minimal damage  (Read 579 times)
Vice President Christian Man
Christian Man
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,732
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -2.26

P P P

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 02, 2022, 03:11:18 PM »

https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/02/us/solar-babcock-ranch-florida-hurricane-ian-climate

Could this be a solution for future cities to avoid/limit catastrophes caused by storms?
Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,158


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2022, 03:28:25 PM »

Nice article, thanks for posting it.
Logged
Schiff for Senate
CentristRepublican
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,350
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2022, 03:32:11 PM »

Could this be a solution for future cities to avoid/limit catastrophes caused by storms?

Yes, it absolutely could. And things like the power crisis in TX last year could probably be avoided with this kind of thing, as well. I'm very glad that you posted this - now, you and all of us can see just one more benefit of going solar.
Logged
Vice President Christian Man
Christian Man
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,732
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -2.26

P P P

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2022, 07:37:52 PM »

You're welcome
Logged
Vice President Christian Man
Christian Man
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,732
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -2.26

P P P

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2022, 07:41:33 PM »

Could this be a solution for future cities to avoid/limit catastrophes caused by storms?

Yes, it absolutely could. And things like the power crisis in TX last year could probably be avoided with this kind of thing, as well. I'm very glad that you posted this - now, you and all of us can see just one more benefit of going solar.
Yes I was thinking about that definitely. Solar also benefits the poor/working class as they wouldn't have to pay as much in electric bills.
Logged
Hermit For Peace
hermit
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,918


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 02, 2022, 09:47:22 PM »


It's the wave of the future.
Logged
Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom
theflyingmongoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,337
Norway


Political Matrix
E: 3.41, S: -1.29

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2022, 09:57:51 PM »

Yes, where are the blue avs? Are they just not here because it doesn't conform to their narrative that coal is the most efficient and reliable resource?
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,294
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 02, 2022, 10:00:56 PM »


Not really no, this is only a solution to limit catastrophes specifically caused by power outages. This is good nevertheless and should be commended, but we can't pretend that these houses wouldn't have been washed away by twelve feet of storm surge and waters rushing over 100 mph if they were on Sanibel Island

I don't think that anyone is suggesting that solar panels can protect structures from physical damage. And power outages are...generally a major problem when it comes to dealing with the aftermath of a natural disaster?
Logged
courts
Ghost_white
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,488
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 02, 2022, 10:06:42 PM »

Yes, where are the blue avs? Are they just not here because it doesn't conform to their narrative that coal is the most efficient and reliable resource?
who said that?
Logged
riceowl
riceowl315
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,365


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 02, 2022, 10:17:27 PM »

What a positive thread!
Logged
Vice President Christian Man
Christian Man
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,732
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -2.26

P P P

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 02, 2022, 10:34:25 PM »
« Edited: October 02, 2022, 10:38:43 PM by Christian Man »


Not really no, this is only a solution to limit catastrophes specifically caused by power outages. This is good nevertheless and should be commended, but we can't pretend that these houses wouldn't have been washed away by twelve feet of storm surge and waters rushing over 100 mph if they were on Sanibel Island

I don't think that anyone is suggesting that solar panels can protect structures from physical damage. And power outages are...generally a major problem when it comes to dealing with the aftermath of a natural disaster?

Yes, when did I say otherwise? Literally the next paragraph that you cut out I mentioned that

Of course this is one of many solutions

Solar panels by themselves aren't going to prevent physical damage but they buried the power lines underground. I think our technological and electrical infrastructure is long overdue for an update and moving them underground is the answer. Some of these communities are flattened but this community is clearly doing something right if it's managing to hold up as well as it is. The solar panels just take a burden off the taxpayer when it comes to electric bills.

You made a point when you mentioned it being an inland location but even then it was spared compared to nearby areas.
Logged
GP270watch
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,704


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 02, 2022, 11:40:35 PM »

Solar Panel arrays can survive Category 5 storms. There was a big study done on the aftermath of major hurricanes that passed through Caribbean Islands and what mounting techniques survived and which didn't.

 Places like Puerto Rico especially need more solar installations, which would relieve the island of its major grid problems. After the recent hurricane that hit Puerto Rico the whole island basically went dark. This Babcock Ranch example is good guide for other places and it's the second storm the community has survived intact with Irma being the other.
Logged
Aurelius
Cody
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,163
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.35, S: 0.35

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 02, 2022, 11:45:55 PM »

>thread has 7 posts, 3 by the same person

wHeRe aRE tHe bLUe aVs?
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,060


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 03, 2022, 05:58:16 AM »


They’re still working out the “but what about BLM?” angle to this story
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 03, 2022, 08:14:39 AM »

One issue with this story is that the major damage in Fort Myers was due to storm surge, not wind. Babcock Ranch is a fascinating development, and the fact it didn't face power issues was neat... but it's also nowhere near the ocean, so by its nature it would never face a storm surge threat. Of course, this is probably an intentional part of the build, which suggests a way that Florida must but will not adapt (moving away from the coast), but it's not quite as cut and dry as this article suggests.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,029
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 03, 2022, 09:23:01 AM »

Florida has always been a big solar state.  It ranks #3 in the nation for total solar production, only behind California and Texas.

The difference between solar in Florida and solar in liberal states like New Jersey, Maryland, etc. is that policy in the liberal states is written to prefer rooftop solar installers who get power purchase agreements (PPAs) to sell discounted electricity to homeowners.  PPAs are more expensive in the long-run and reduce overall generation and distribution capacity by steering revenues away from utilities.

The Florida model is large-scale solar arrays operated by regulated utilities and paid for by ratepayers.  This gives utilities a reason to invest in solar (which is something Democrats don't like, they'd rather steer investment toward the solar firms who contribute to their campaigns) while greening the total energy generation mix. 
Logged
Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom
theflyingmongoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,337
Norway


Political Matrix
E: 3.41, S: -1.29

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 03, 2022, 09:58:45 AM »

Florida has always been a big solar state.  It ranks #3 in the nation for total solar production, only behind California and Texas.

The difference between solar in Florida and solar in liberal states like New Jersey, Maryland, etc. is that policy in the liberal states is written to prefer rooftop solar installers who get power purchase agreements (PPAs) to sell discounted electricity to homeowners.  PPAs are more expensive in the long-run and reduce overall generation and distribution capacity by steering revenues away from utilities.

The Florida model is large-scale solar arrays operated by regulated utilities and paid for by ratepayers.  This gives utilities a reason to invest in solar (which is something Democrats don't like, they'd rather steer investment toward the solar firms who contribute to their campaigns) while greening the total energy generation mix. 

Imagine having a positive opinion of utility companies.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,588
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 03, 2022, 12:41:28 PM »

I don't think that anyone is suggesting that solar panels can protect structures from physical damage.
the thread title implies it
Imagine having a positive opinion of utility companies.
everyone praising this story is doing that.  From the article
Quote
The ranch broke ground in 2015 with the construction of the solar array — which was built and is run by Florida Power and Light — and its first residents moved into the town in 2018. Since then, the array has doubled in size and thousands of people have made Babcock their home.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,360
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 03, 2022, 01:38:50 PM »

Florida has always been a big solar state.  It ranks #3 in the nation for total solar production, only behind California and Texas.

The difference between solar in Florida and solar in liberal states like New Jersey, Maryland, etc. is that policy in the liberal states is written to prefer rooftop solar installers who get power purchase agreements (PPAs) to sell discounted electricity to homeowners.  PPAs are more expensive in the long-run and reduce overall generation and distribution capacity by steering revenues away from utilities.

The Florida model is large-scale solar arrays operated by regulated utilities and paid for by ratepayers.  This gives utilities a reason to invest in solar (which is something Democrats don't like, they'd rather steer investment toward the solar firms who contribute to their campaigns) while greening the total energy generation mix. 

Imagine having a positive opinion of utility companies.

>criticizes utility companies for providing power when that's their job
Logged
Aurelius
Cody
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,163
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.35, S: 0.35

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 03, 2022, 06:42:06 PM »

Florida has always been a big solar state.  It ranks #3 in the nation for total solar production, only behind California and Texas.

The difference between solar in Florida and solar in liberal states like New Jersey, Maryland, etc. is that policy in the liberal states is written to prefer rooftop solar installers who get power purchase agreements (PPAs) to sell discounted electricity to homeowners.  PPAs are more expensive in the long-run and reduce overall generation and distribution capacity by steering revenues away from utilities.

The Florida model is large-scale solar arrays operated by regulated utilities and paid for by ratepayers.  This gives utilities a reason to invest in solar (which is something Democrats don't like, they'd rather steer investment toward the solar firms who contribute to their campaigns) while greening the total energy generation mix. 

Imagine having a positive opinion of utility companies.
We are jaded by PG&E. Most utility companies are not PG&E.
Logged
Schiff for Senate
CentristRepublican
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,350
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 03, 2022, 07:16:29 PM »

>thread has 7 posts, 3 by the same person

wHeRe aRE tHe bLUe aVs?

It's not just this thread. Frequently, we find threads incriminating the GOP, where blue avatars are conspicuously absent.

That said, Courts is right: enough blue avatars have moved past the talking point of 'coal is the best', and agree that some (too little, too late - far too slow and not-nearly-far-reaching) action is necessary, some transition to renewable (such as DT). Other than that, plenty of blue avatars have also endorsed nuclear energy (such as GregTheGreat).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.238 seconds with 11 queries.