What's wrong with just saying "women"? (a new absolutely ridiculous term)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 03:14:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  What's wrong with just saying "women"? (a new absolutely ridiculous term)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: What's wrong with just saying "women"? (a new absolutely ridiculous term)  (Read 650 times)
DaleCooper
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,446


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: March 03, 2022, 05:22:24 PM »

This legit makes no sense since "womyn" is a lot of the time a terf thing to exclude "men" but then they're putting x at the end of it to imply that it's somehow "inclusive". They just cancel each other out so you might as well just spell it the usual way.

Let's play "how to be so stupid to let a fascist win an election" game!

The stupid people are the ones who would vote on this.

Okay, sure, but with the knowledge you now have that people are voting on this, why not stop doing it to stop losing voters? If you actually care about stopping Trump or another Republican as bad or worse seems like you'd be willing to do what it takes to win, like stopping with the pointlessly divisive rhetoric on social issues.

Democrats don't understand that all of these disastrous cultural issues add up to the point where voters don't even recognize the country anymore. This womynx crap just gets added to the sky-high pile of examples of leftwing people doing similar things when they take over institutions.

Also, I'm getting really tired of the leftwing posters trying to gaslight everybody into thinking it's unreasonable to be opposed to this crap.  If Northwest Missouri State University said, "Today commemorates the day our Lord Jesus Christ triumphed over the wickedness of sin . . ." then there absolutely would be a thread full of red avatar outrage over it.
Logged
LAB-LIB
Dale Bumpers
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 612
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: March 03, 2022, 07:14:43 PM »

This legit makes no sense since "womyn" is a lot of the time a terf thing to exclude "men" but then they're putting x at the end of it to imply that it's somehow "inclusive". They just cancel each other out so you might as well just spell it the usual way.

Let's play "how to be so stupid to let a fascist win an election" game!

The stupid people are the ones who would vote on this.

Okay, sure, but with the knowledge you now have that people are voting on this, why not stop doing it to stop losing voters? If you actually care about stopping Trump or another Republican as bad or worse seems like you'd be willing to do what it takes to win, like stopping with the pointlessly divisive rhetoric on social issues.

Democrats don't understand that all of these disastrous cultural issues add up to the point where voters don't even recognize the country anymore. This womynx crap just gets added to the sky-high pile of examples of leftwing people doing similar things when they take over institutions.

Also, I'm getting really tired of the leftwing posters trying to gaslight everybody into thinking it's unreasonable to be opposed to this crap.  If Northwest Missouri State University said, "Today commemorates the day our Lord Jesus Christ triumphed over the wickedness of sin . . ." then there absolutely would be a thread full of red avatar outrage over it.

This is exactly the kind of thing I'm worried about. Not that Democrats are going to start saying "womynx" but that they will continue to be associated with things they have nothing to do with like "womynx" and "defund the police" even though none of them say "womynx" and none of them support defunding the police.
Logged
Hermit For Peace
hermit
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,918


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: March 04, 2022, 02:15:26 PM »

This legit makes no sense since "womyn" is a lot of the time a terf thing to exclude "men" but then they're putting x at the end of it to imply that it's somehow "inclusive". They just cancel each other out so you might as well just spell it the usual way.

Let's play "how to be so stupid to let a fascist win an election" game!

The stupid people are the ones who would vote on this.

Okay, sure, but with the knowledge you now have that people are voting on this, why not stop doing it to stop losing voters? If you actually care about stopping Trump or another Republican as bad or worse seems like you'd be willing to do what it takes to win, like stopping with the pointlessly divisive rhetoric on social issues.

Democrats don't understand that all of these disastrous cultural issues add up to the point where voters don't even recognize the country anymore. This womynx crap just gets added to the sky-high pile of examples of leftwing people doing similar things when they take over institutions.

Also, I'm getting really tired of the leftwing posters trying to gaslight everybody into thinking it's unreasonable to be opposed to this crap.  If Northwest Missouri State University said, "Today commemorates the day our Lord Jesus Christ triumphed over the wickedness of sin . . ." then there absolutely would be a thread full of red avatar outrage over it.

This is exactly the kind of thing I'm worried about. Not that Democrats are going to start saying "womynx" but that they will continue to be associated with things they have nothing to do with like "womynx" and "defund the police" even though none of them say "womynx" and none of them support defunding the police.

LOL. It's spelled (and sounds) just like woman, but you put an "x" in place of the "a". Womxn.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,325
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: March 04, 2022, 02:23:50 PM »

Talk Elections dot org users with almost 100,000 posts wouldn't be able to pad to their post count.
Logged
LAB-LIB
Dale Bumpers
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 612
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: March 04, 2022, 05:15:57 PM »

This legit makes no sense since "womyn" is a lot of the time a terf thing to exclude "men" but then they're putting x at the end of it to imply that it's somehow "inclusive". They just cancel each other out so you might as well just spell it the usual way.

Let's play "how to be so stupid to let a fascist win an election" game!

The stupid people are the ones who would vote on this.

Okay, sure, but with the knowledge you now have that people are voting on this, why not stop doing it to stop losing voters? If you actually care about stopping Trump or another Republican as bad or worse seems like you'd be willing to do what it takes to win, like stopping with the pointlessly divisive rhetoric on social issues.

Democrats don't understand that all of these disastrous cultural issues add up to the point where voters don't even recognize the country anymore. This womynx crap just gets added to the sky-high pile of examples of leftwing people doing similar things when they take over institutions.

Also, I'm getting really tired of the leftwing posters trying to gaslight everybody into thinking it's unreasonable to be opposed to this crap.  If Northwest Missouri State University said, "Today commemorates the day our Lord Jesus Christ triumphed over the wickedness of sin . . ." then there absolutely would be a thread full of red avatar outrage over it.

This is exactly the kind of thing I'm worried about. Not that Democrats are going to start saying "womynx" but that they will continue to be associated with things they have nothing to do with like "womynx" and "defund the police" even though none of them say "womynx" and none of them support defunding the police.

LOL. It's spelled (and sounds) just like woman, but you put an "x" in place of the "a". Womxn.

Yes but they spelled it "Womynx". Why that is I do not know.
Logged
Hermit For Peace
hermit
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,918


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: March 04, 2022, 05:53:08 PM »

This legit makes no sense since "womyn" is a lot of the time a terf thing to exclude "men" but then they're putting x at the end of it to imply that it's somehow "inclusive". They just cancel each other out so you might as well just spell it the usual way.

Let's play "how to be so stupid to let a fascist win an election" game!

The stupid people are the ones who would vote on this.

Okay, sure, but with the knowledge you now have that people are voting on this, why not stop doing it to stop losing voters? If you actually care about stopping Trump or another Republican as bad or worse seems like you'd be willing to do what it takes to win, like stopping with the pointlessly divisive rhetoric on social issues.

Democrats don't understand that all of these disastrous cultural issues add up to the point where voters don't even recognize the country anymore. This womynx crap just gets added to the sky-high pile of examples of leftwing people doing similar things when they take over institutions.

Also, I'm getting really tired of the leftwing posters trying to gaslight everybody into thinking it's unreasonable to be opposed to this crap.  If Northwest Missouri State University said, "Today commemorates the day our Lord Jesus Christ triumphed over the wickedness of sin . . ." then there absolutely would be a thread full of red avatar outrage over it.

This is exactly the kind of thing I'm worried about. Not that Democrats are going to start saying "womynx" but that they will continue to be associated with things they have nothing to do with like "womynx" and "defund the police" even though none of them say "womynx" and none of them support defunding the police.

LOL. It's spelled (and sounds) just like woman, but you put an "x" in place of the "a". Womxn.

Yes but they spelled it "Womynx". Why that is I do not know.

Then LOL on them.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.223 seconds with 12 queries.