Protestors removed from PRIVATE land
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 06:47:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Protestors removed from PRIVATE land
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Protestors removed from PRIVATE land  (Read 1328 times)
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 13, 2006, 04:05:43 PM »


This guy is so right:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

"Daryl Hannah removed from tree"

Sheriff's deputies evicted people from an urban community garden to make room for a warehouse Tuesday, touching off a furious protest in which actress Daryl Hannah and others climbed into a walnut tree or chained themselves to concrete-filled barrels. At least 39 people were arrested.

Authorities cut away branches and used a fire truck lift to bring down the "Splash" actress and another tree-sitter, who raised their fists as they were removed. It was not immediately clear whether Hannah was under arrest.

"I'm very confident this is the morally right thing to do, to take a principled stand in solidarity with the farmers," Hannah said by cell phone before a fire truck raised officers into the tree.

About 350 people grow produce and flowers on the 14 acres of privately owned land, in an inner-city area surrounded by warehouses and railroad tracks. The garden has been there for more than a decade, but the landowner, Ralph Horowitz, now wants to replace it with a warehouse.

(Cont...)
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2006, 10:00:52 PM »

If they cared so much, they should have offered to buy the land.
Logged
adam
Captain Vlad
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,922


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -5.04

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2006, 10:10:32 PM »

Good. If they were on private land, than they were trespassing.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,879


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2006, 10:13:27 PM »

It was public land until the city was forced to sell.

Of course we don't need any inconvient facts.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2006, 10:26:09 PM »

It was public land until the city was forced to sell.

Of course we don't need any inconvient facts.

Does that change the fact that it is private land at this current time? No. So it's irrelevant.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2006, 10:28:07 PM »

Horowitz had offered to sell 10 of the acres, but those celebrity posers wouldn't come up with the money needed to meet his asking price.  Yet another inconvienient fact I guess.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,732
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 13, 2006, 10:29:47 PM »

Horowitz had offered to sell 10 of the acres, but those celebrity posers wouldn't come up with the money needed to meet his asking price.  Yet another inconvienient fact I guess.

Heh, I was thinking the same thing just now - if those celebrities really cared, they'd donate more than a bit of time to get free press.
Logged
Mr. Paleoconservative
Reagan Raider
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 560
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.29, S: 5.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 13, 2006, 10:33:05 PM »

Horowitz had offered to sell 10 of the acres, but those celebrity posers wouldn't come up with the money needed to meet his asking price.  Yet another inconvienient fact I guess.

How about An Inconvenient Truth? 

Hardy Har Har....
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2006, 12:39:35 AM »

Daryl Hannah? Meh. I'd have left her tied to the tree and started the bulldozing.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,963


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 15, 2006, 09:53:03 PM »

Any of you all ever hear of the Homestead Act?
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 15, 2006, 11:02:41 PM »

It was public land until the city was forced to sell.

Of course we don't need any inconvient facts.

Who "forced" the city to sell it?
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 16, 2006, 12:20:11 AM »

Any of you all ever hear of the Homestead Act?

What's that got to do with the price of tea in China?
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 16, 2006, 07:10:17 AM »

Any of you all ever hear of the Homestead Act?

What's that got to do with the price of tea in China?

I'm familiar with it, but it dealt with publicly owned land.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.23 seconds with 12 queries.