Susquehanna Polling and Research excludes new voters

[Gass3268]

https://twitter.com/electionsmith/status/1321247463089590274?s=20
https://twitter.com/electionsmith/status/1321250985717698565?s=20

[Horus]

If true 538 should remove them from the averages.

[Darthpi – Anti-Florida Activist]

And suddenly everything makes sense.

[Gass3268]

If true 538 should remove them from the averages.

It says it in their methodology.

[Hindsight was 2020]

And yet SAD and PATHETIC RCP will keep them in the average cause lil Sean Trende is a sad and pathetic HATER! (Enemy of the people?)

[Ljube]

Yes, I've just read that section and it says:

Only registered voters are contacted with prior vote history in one or better elections using 2018, 2016, 2014 and/or 2012 elections.

[Interlocutor is just not there yet]

Between this and Nate's graph showing the lack of movement in post-debate polls, all this talk about a recent "tightening" seem to be deflating quickly today

[KaiserDave]

Susquehanna is nonsense! Really? WOW. Shocked! Dismayed! Unbelievable!

[ExSky]

Blue avatars and doomers  gonna Completely ignore this.

[TiltsAreUnderrated]

If true 538 should remove them from the averages.

This is just crappy methodology, not necessarily bad faith methodology.

[GeorgiaModerate]

If true 538 should remove them from the averages.

This is just crappy methodology, not necessarily bad faith methodology.

Perhaps. But if you wanted to design a methodology that might be plausible on its face but skewed R, this would be a good one.

[NYSforKennedy2024]

Why is it EVERY polling firm that gets busted for having shady methodology has oddly pro-GOP results or blatant connections to the GOP?