FL: Monmouth - Biden +5
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 03:11:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  FL: Monmouth - Biden +5
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Poll
Question: How will Florida go
#1
Biden 50
 
#2
Biden 45
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 11

Author Topic: FL: Monmouth - Biden +5  (Read 2839 times)
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,901


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: September 15, 2020, 01:15:26 PM »

I noticed that Monmouth does their polling in spanish and english. Is this something that could effect other pollsters who have different/outlier Latino results?

OMG dude they polled only 23 Hispanics.

Huh? My question isn't related to this poll in particular, just to polls in general. If pollsters aren't surveying spanish-speaking latinos and just english-speaking, they could alter the result. Calm the f**k down.

I wasn’t replying to your question actually, my comment was directed at your assumption that this poll is accurate and the others are “outliers”. I think it’s crazy to believe a 23 voter sample gets more accurate results than a 600 voter sample, but you do you, I guess...

An outlier Latino result to me is Biden *losing* Latinos in FL outright, which IS an outlier result compared to everything that we've seen in 2016 and 2018.
Logged
WD
Western Democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,604
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: September 15, 2020, 01:21:39 PM »

For those of you who care about accuracy, Monmouth did two polls in 2016. One in August, one in September (around the same time as now). They got +9 Clinton in August and +5 Clinton in September (when Clinton only led nationally by 2). They did not do any polls in the state in 2018, and it's probably for their best that they didn't.

Clinton was up 46-41, Biden is at 50 which is a much more secure lead, not to mention that the polls says 49% of voters are not likely to support Trump. Independents are also much more likely to go towards Biden than Trump this year. But no, that doesn’t matter because muh polls wer rong!!!!
Logged
redjohn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,698
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -4.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: September 15, 2020, 01:25:50 PM »

Hopefully FL polls turn out accurate this year.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,573
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: September 15, 2020, 01:27:49 PM »

I noticed that Monmouth does their polling in spanish and english. Is this something that could effect other pollsters who have different/outlier Latino results?

OMG dude they polled only 23 Hispanics.

They actually did an oversample of Hispanics: "The survey contacted a small oversample of Hispanic voters" and then weighed it back down to 23.
Logged
Nyvin
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,693
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: September 15, 2020, 02:03:18 PM »

Great poll day for Biden
Logged
tagimaucia
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 570


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: September 15, 2020, 02:17:48 PM »

Monmouth is a very good pollster overall, but I think its fair to be mildly skeptical because they were off in a fair number of places in 2016.  I'd like to see a Siena or Selzer poll of Florida because I don't really trust a lot of the other pollsters in FL either.
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,776


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: September 15, 2020, 05:37:52 PM »

428 registered/likely voters
MoE: 4.7%
The high/low turnout models are high/low with respect to 2016 turnout levels.

Further details on the Registered Voters sample:

"Other 2%" = Jorgensen 2% + Hawkins <1%
No one 1%
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: September 15, 2020, 10:34:47 PM »

Remember when several posters unironically predicted that FL was less winnable for Biden than IA just because of a few (cherry-picked) results in 2018? Good times.
Logged
DaleCooper
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,334


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: September 16, 2020, 07:56:05 AM »

Remember when several posters unironically predicted that FL was less winnable for Biden than IA just because of a few (cherry-picked) results in 2018? Good times.

Well that's because Iowa is elastic whereas Dems in FL have a ceiling of .01% lower than whatever the Republicans get. /s
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,539
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: September 16, 2020, 11:21:57 AM »

Beautiful number from Monmouth for Florida.
"Strong" Tilt Biden.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.219 seconds with 15 queries.