MIMAL states trends
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 11:11:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  MIMAL states trends
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MIMAL states trends  (Read 217 times)
iceman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,088
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 14, 2020, 06:11:18 PM »
« edited: November 14, 2020, 06:16:05 PM by iceman »

We all are familiar how the MIMAL states (Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana) have been politically realigning in an ascending fashion: starting with Louisiana in early 2000s, then Arkansas in 2008, Missouri in 2012, Iowa in 2020. Minnesota seems to be stubborn and not showing it would budging anytime soon. Is this trend purely coincidence and circumstantial? Or is there something really with the demographics and geography of these 5 states that contributed to this phenomenon?
Logged
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,982


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2020, 11:12:04 PM »

Minnesota is more educated than any of these by a good amount. Given the newfound education divide, this has maintained its partisan lean even as Democrats hemorrhage non-college educated Whites. It also has a booming metro to attract new Democratic voters, something those other states don't (St. Louis and New Orleans have declining populations.)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.208 seconds with 12 queries.