Post-Covid In-Person Voters to Vote by Mail - Comparison from Primaries
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 09:05:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Post-Covid In-Person Voters to Vote by Mail - Comparison from Primaries
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Post-Covid In-Person Voters to Vote by Mail - Comparison from Primaries  (Read 195 times)
StateBoiler
fe234
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,890


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 16, 2020, 01:39:29 PM »

In past elections I have noticed that mail voters for both parties tend to vote more heavily for the establishment candidates. Although the proportion of total voters they make up is somewhere around 2%.

These results are based on 2 counties in northeast Indiana which did primaries in early June, Allen which includes Fort Wayne, and Whitley to its west. I share these because they present a stark contrast.

Allen Democrats:

Mail Voters - 16704, 61%

Quote
Biden 84.0%
Sanders 8.9%
Buttigieg 2.7%
Warren 2.4%
Other 2.0%

In-Person Early Voters - 1115, 4%

Quote
Biden 76.6%
Sanders 14.9%
Warren 2.8%
Buttigieg 2.5%
Other 3.2%

Election Day Voters - 9706, 35%

Quote
Biden 66.1%
Sanders 23.6%
Buttigieg 3.5%
Warren 3.3%
Other 3.5%

Whitley Democrats:

Mail Voters - 769, 55%

Quote
Biden 85.2%
Sanders 8.7%
Buttigieg 3.4%
Other 2.7%

Early In-Person Voters - 56, 4%

Quote
Biden 82.1%
Sanders 12.5%
Warren 3.6%
Other 1.8%

Election Day Voters - 518, 41%

Quote
Biden 67.2%
Sanders 19.1%
Buttigieg 5.0%
Warren 2.6%
Other 6.0%

There's a similar outsized performance for the Democrats' sacrificial lamb for the Congress election on his mail vote compared to his in-person vote, although that was a more open race. (so in Whiltey the mail vote for him was 54%, election day vote for him was 32%)

The Republican vote for president and Congress were both 2-way races and the results were more or less uniform across the board.

Anyone seeing similar things elsewhere? I'm not saying anything untoward is happening here, but it's a unique breakdown of 2 different electorates for the same races in a primary that is outside the norms of what would be expected from regular statistical deviation.
Logged
Hope For A New Era
EastOfEden
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2020, 03:58:24 PM »

The similar thing to this that I've noticed was the 2016 primary/caucus split. Clinton did well in primaries, Sanders did well in caucuses.

So that fits the pattern of: more "private" way of voting = for some reason, more establishment, not less.
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,287
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2020, 11:23:02 PM »

I'd assume it's partially because those who support more anti-establishment candidates are more likely to be passionate supporters and willing to wait in long lines to vote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.217 seconds with 13 queries.