TX-UT Austin/Texas Tribune: Trump +5
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 11:48:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  TX-UT Austin/Texas Tribune: Trump +5
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: TX-UT Austin/Texas Tribune: Trump +5  (Read 2525 times)
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,965
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: April 26, 2020, 09:17:37 AM »

Yes, but with African Americans and white females, TX outnumber the white male majority
Logged
TrendsareUsuallyReal
TrendsareReal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,098
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: April 26, 2020, 09:23:06 AM »

Texas is Lean R. Biden should focus more on GA.

No No No. Georgia is fools gold. I give Dems next to zero chance at winning GA in both Presidential and the Senate as well. Not happening - even if Biden has a great night

As for Texas: We always say “not this year but in 4 years” with Texas. Been saying it for a while now. I think 2028 is the year that it could actually flip. Maybe 2024, but definitely not 2020.

Thank God you’re not in a position to call any actual shots. Leaving a state with a 40% non white electorate and a burgeoning metropolis zooming to the Dems on the table is political malpractice.

That’s the difference between Republicans and Democrats. Republicans see a state they lost by 1% as an opportunity. Democrats see states they lost by 1% (Georgia and Florida) as traige-able lost causes

Clinton lost GA by 5, not by 1. And yeah, the above poster is right, throwing money in GA would be a waste of ressources for democrats, the same way that throwing money in MN or NV would be a waste of ressources for republicans. A state which is close is not necessarily winnable. GA is relatively close but republicans have a very solid floor which is above the democratic ceilling, that's why democrats always fall short, including in huge D waves like the ones of 2008 or 2018. The same pattern is true in MN, a republican can come close to winning (see in 2010), but he will fall short because democrats have a floor which is higher than the republican ceilling.   

Thanks Captain Obvious, but Kemp just won by 1%
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.215 seconds with 12 queries.