John Nance Garner runs 3rd party in 1940
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 10:37:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  John Nance Garner runs 3rd party in 1940
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: John Nance Garner runs 3rd party in 1940  (Read 479 times)
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,053
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 03, 2019, 02:50:28 AM »

I've posted a scenario in the random maps board last week, but what does Atlas think? If VP John Nance Garner ran 3rd party in 1940 against FDR, how would that have turned out? He challenged FDR for the nomination, but failed badly. Other than his run, nothing else changes.
Logged
morgankingsley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2019, 04:06:16 AM »

He could possibly win MS, SC, and AL and would probably get second in most southern states but his luck would not stretch too far
Logged
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,234
Georgia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2019, 08:16:43 AM »

Does he only run in the South?
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,053
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2019, 10:04:31 AM »


Nah, on ballot of all 48 states.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,398
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2019, 12:57:32 PM »

FDR still wins handily, but Garner carries a few states in the South and takes a away a few thousand votes away from the Democratic ticket that allows Willkie to take a few more states with pluralities.



✓ President Franklin D. Roosevelt (D-NY)/Secretary of Agriculture Henry A. Wallace (D-IA): 367 EV. (51.93%)
Businessman Wendell Willkie (R-NY)/Senator Charles L. McNary (R-OR): 126 EV. (44.27%)
Vice President John Nance Garner (I-TX)/Senator Allen J. Ellender (I-LA): 38 EV. (2.72%)
Logged
brucejoel99
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,962
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2019, 05:22:24 PM »

It goes nowhere, as he really didn't have the support in the party or the national popularity to pull off such a coup.
Logged
morgankingsley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,029
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2019, 05:25:49 PM »

FDR still wins handily, but Garner carries a few states in the South and takes a away a few thousand votes away from the Democratic ticket that allows Willkie to take a few more states with pluralities.



✓ President Franklin D. Roosevelt (D-NY)/Secretary of Agriculture Henry A. Wallace (D-IA): 367 EV. (51.93%)
Businessman Wendell Willkie (R-NY)/Senator Charles L. McNary (R-OR): 126 EV. (44.27%)
Vice President John Nance Garner (I-TX)/Senator Allen J. Ellender (I-LA): 38 EV. (2.72%)

While I agree with you that garner would get a couple of states, I think him being vice president would have had a more valid track record than thurmond being a governor, and would therefore probably give him a good 10 to 15 points more in the southern states he loses, would would net him 3.5 to maybe even 4 percent of the vote
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.216 seconds with 14 queries.