Should Dems seriously contest Wisconsin's 1st congressional district?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 06:32:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Should Dems seriously contest Wisconsin's 1st congressional district?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Should Dems seriously contest Wisconsin's 1st congressional district?  (Read 1960 times)
Boobs
HCP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,546
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: May 07, 2019, 11:41:00 AM »

I'd trade a split Milwaukee for Austin to have its own Democratic House seat in Texas.

Don't worry Austin will have its own democratic vote sink CD after 2021

Travis County is at 1.25 million people now. It'll probably warrant two vote sinks, Austin and then Travis+Bastrop or Hays, or Round Rock in Wilco.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,573
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: May 07, 2019, 12:30:40 PM »

I should note that in my map, the vast majority of the City of Milwaukee stays together. Only the awkward western arms and a bit of the south (these areas are the most competitive area of the city too, fyi) is added to the first district.
Logged
Frenchrepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,275


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: May 07, 2019, 12:59:38 PM »

I should note that in my map, the vast majority of the City of Milwaukee stays together. Only the awkward western arms and a bit of the south (these areas are the most competitive area of the city too, fyi) is added to the first district.

Yeah, but there is no good reason to split Sheybogan County and you can draw a entire CD inside Milwaukee county
Logged
Gass3268
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,573
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: May 07, 2019, 01:03:43 PM »

I should note that in my map, the vast majority of the City of Milwaukee stays together. Only the awkward western arms and a bit of the south (these areas are the most competitive area of the city too, fyi) is added to the first district.

Yeah, but there is no good reason to split Sheybogan County and you can draw a entire CD inside Milwaukee county

My map splits Milwaukee County two times, compared to the current map which splits it 4 times.
Logged
Frenchrepublican
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,275


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: May 07, 2019, 01:18:08 PM »

I should note that in my map, the vast majority of the City of Milwaukee stays together. Only the awkward western arms and a bit of the south (these areas are the most competitive area of the city too, fyi) is added to the first district.

Yeah, but there is no good reason to split Sheybogan County and you can draw a entire CD inside Milwaukee county

My map splits Milwaukee County two times, compared to the current map which splits it 4 times.

I'm absolutely not defending the 2011 map nevertheless I think that when you can draw a entire CD inside a county, because this county has a large enough population to accomodate a full district, you should do it (my argument applies to Oklahoma County / Hamilton County, OH / Travis County which are large enough to have a full CD inside their boundaries)
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: May 09, 2019, 06:01:34 PM »

Leah Vukmir carried it, LOL. No.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: May 09, 2019, 06:03:01 PM »

Somehow, Leah Vukmir won the District in a huge upset last year, which would indicate that its completely unwinnable for Democrats in general at the Congressional level.

Huge upset? I predicted she had a good chance at winning it and you said I was insane, lol.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,648
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: May 09, 2019, 10:03:37 PM »

If Bryce couldn't come within single digits in a D wave, I don't see how anyone else will win. So no.


He wasn't the solution. He was the problem.

But...but...but Atlas told me the voters find deadbeat Dads sympathetic because it proves they struggle to pay their bills like #RealAmericans.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,345
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: May 10, 2019, 07:51:58 AM »

The only reason people cared about the race is because Dems wanted to oust the Speaker (even Bryce's supposed successful fundraising was largely leftover momentum from before Ryan confirmed his retirement). Now Ryan is yesterday's man, it's just one in a small army of seats that would require a perfect storm to win over.
Logged
VPH
vivaportugalhabs
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,714
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: May 10, 2019, 09:41:27 AM »

Bryce turned out to be one of the most overhyped candidates of the cycle. He was a deadbeat failed state senate candidate who made an astoundingly good video that captured the anti-Paul Ryan mood of the Democrats. Maybe Cathy Myers could have come closer, but I don't think it's the kind of district where Democrats stand a strong chance. You never know what might unfold, so it's best to recruit somebody serious, but it shouldn't be a place where we prioritize sending resources to.
Logged
Co-Chair Bagel23
Bagel23
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,369
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: -1.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: May 10, 2019, 12:10:32 PM »

No.
Logged
We Live in Black and White
SvenTC
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,697
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.81, S: -6.82

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: May 10, 2019, 02:30:53 PM »

No reason to waste money here at this point, barring a freak Paul Nehlen primary win or somesuch. Better to shore up our vulnerable districts and pick off the stragglers we missed in 2018.
Logged
TJ in Oregon
TJ in Cleve
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: 6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: May 10, 2019, 08:36:24 PM »

I should note that in my map, the vast majority of the City of Milwaukee stays together. Only the awkward western arms and a bit of the south (these areas are the most competitive area of the city too, fyi) is added to the first district.

Yeah, but there is no good reason to split Sheybogan County and you can draw a entire CD inside Milwaukee county

My map splits Milwaukee County two times, compared to the current map which splits it 4 times.

While the current map is a Republican gerrymander of course, yours is a Democratic gerrymander. The two things that really stick out are the appendage attached to Eau Claire, and of course, the arm coming out of Milwaukee to the north. WI-7 really needs to be untangled in that map, a bit like it does in real life.

IMO a neutral drawing of Milwaukee County is going to start with the city itself, then take in the entirety of the North Shore (as it is boxed in) and then start on other Milwaukee County suburbs.

A neutral drawing of Madison is simple, start with Dane County and then figure out later what else needs to go with it depending on how the rest turns out.

I'd also prefer starting with Brown and Outagmie Counties in WI-8.

Then the rest of the map sorts of fills itself out. The thing that is hard about it is that WI-1 has to decide what else to grab after Kenosha, Racine, and Walworth.
Logged
MapModerate
Rookie
**
Posts: 17
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: May 11, 2019, 01:43:36 PM »

No. Walworth county refuses to trend D.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,431
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: May 11, 2019, 04:41:30 PM »

The only reason people cared about the race is because Dems wanted to oust the Speaker (even Bryce's supposed successful fundraising was largely leftover momentum from before Ryan confirmed his retirement). Now Ryan is yesterday's man, it's just one in a small army of seats that would require a perfect storm to win over.
Also Bryce's meme status, even though he was objectively a terrible candidate.
Logged
Perlen vor den Schweinen
kongress
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 973
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: May 11, 2019, 04:45:19 PM »

I've spent a lot of money and I've spent a lot of time.

The stuff we did in Racine was a waste of yours and mine.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,431
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: May 11, 2019, 05:10:13 PM »

The only reason people cared about the race is because Dems wanted to oust the Speaker (even Bryce's supposed successful fundraising was largely leftover momentum from before Ryan confirmed his retirement). Now Ryan is yesterday's man, it's just one in a small army of seats that would require a perfect storm to win over.
Also Bryce's meme status, even though he was objectively a terrible candidate.

I seem to remember you taking a different position on Bryce when IceSpear and I called him out for the fraud he was and yet Atlas was all aboard the Bryce #populist Purple heart train
No? I never thought he was a good candidate. I might've once pointed out the child support thing was overblown (the amount he owed wasn't really that high) but I never argued he was a really strong candidate or a good fit for the district.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,648
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: May 12, 2019, 05:44:57 AM »

The only reason people cared about the race is because Dems wanted to oust the Speaker (even Bryce's supposed successful fundraising was largely leftover momentum from before Ryan confirmed his retirement). Now Ryan is yesterday's man, it's just one in a small army of seats that would require a perfect storm to win over.
Also Bryce's meme status, even though he was objectively a terrible candidate.

I seem to remember you taking a different position on Bryce when IceSpear and I called him out for the fraud he was and yet Atlas was all aboard the Bryce #populist Purple heart train

Pretty sure I was the first person here to call out Bryce for the child support stuff and argue it made him a terrible candidate.
Logged
MapModerate
Rookie
**
Posts: 17
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: May 13, 2019, 11:08:41 AM »

The only reason people cared about the race is because Dems wanted to oust the Speaker (even Bryce's supposed successful fundraising was largely leftover momentum from before Ryan confirmed his retirement). Now Ryan is yesterday's man, it's just one in a small army of seats that would require a perfect storm to win over.
Also Bryce's meme status, even though he was objectively a terrible candidate.

I seem to remember you taking a different position on Bryce when IceSpear and I called him out for the fraud he was and yet Atlas was all aboard the Bryce #populist Purple heart train

Roast him! Epicc!!!!!!!!@!!!!!
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,431
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: May 13, 2019, 06:29:43 PM »

Also the sort of people backing Bryce's memes status weren't the targets of this "populist" meme (whoever they are) but rather dumb #Resistance liberals who basically believed that running a blue collar worker with a mustache is all that's needed to win over working class whites and thus would propel him to victory. In a district that's not even particularly working class to begin with.
Logged
Boobs
HCP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,546
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: May 13, 2019, 06:56:40 PM »

dumb #Resistance liberals who basically believed that running a blue collar worker with a mustache is all that's needed to win over working class whites

You are describing all of Atlas.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,464
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: May 14, 2019, 02:39:22 PM »

Probably not. Wait until after redistricting. I'm guessing WI-03 gets redder while WI-01 gets more competitive.

This here is correct.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,464
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: May 14, 2019, 02:45:02 PM »

I should note that in my map, the vast majority of the City of Milwaukee stays together. Only the awkward western arms and a bit of the south (these areas are the most competitive area of the city too, fyi) is added to the first district.

Yeah, but there is no good reason to split Sheybogan County and you can draw a entire CD inside Milwaukee county

My map splits Milwaukee County two times, compared to the current map which splits it 4 times.

While the current map is a Republican gerrymander of course, yours is a Democratic gerrymander. The two things that really stick out are the appendage attached to Eau Claire, and of course, the arm coming out of Milwaukee to the north. WI-7 really needs to be untangled in that map, a bit like it does in real life.

IMO a neutral drawing of Milwaukee County is going to start with the city itself, then take in the entirety of the North Shore (as it is boxed in) and then start on other Milwaukee County suburbs.

A neutral drawing of Madison is simple, start with Dane County and then figure out later what else needs to go with it depending on how the rest turns out.

I'd also prefer starting with Brown and Outagmie Counties in WI-8.

Then the rest of the map sorts of fills itself out. The thing that is hard about it is that WI-1 has to decide what else to grab after Kenosha, Racine, and Walworth.

A map with fairly contiguous and compact lines that results in a probable 4 / 4 split with competitive districts is a democratic gerrymander??

You guys have really been spoiled this last decade.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.254 seconds with 12 queries.