D-CYFOR nat. poll:Biden 39% Sanders 14% Harris 8% Clinton 8% Warren 5% Booker 4%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 11:24:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  D-CYFOR nat. poll:Biden 39% Sanders 14% Harris 8% Clinton 8% Warren 5% Booker 4%		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: D-CYFOR nat. poll:Biden 39% Sanders 14% Harris 8% Clinton 8% Warren 5% Booker 4%  (Read 1436 times)
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,328
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: March 02, 2019, 02:57:30 PM »
Quote from: Iowa more R than Ohio on March 02, 2019, 12:29:38 PM
People are really underestimating Biden. It’s definitely his race to lose if he decides to run.

Even if that's true (doubt it), he's a professional at losing presidential campaigns spectacularly.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 90,488
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: March 02, 2019, 03:57:33 PM »
Quote from: Excessively Caffeinated Coastal Elitist for Schultz on March 02, 2019, 02:57:30 PM
Quote from: Iowa more R than Ohio on March 02, 2019, 12:29:38 PM
People are really underestimating Biden. It’s definitely his race to lose if he decides to run.

Even if that's true (doubt it), he's a professional at losing presidential campaigns spectacularly.

Harris and Bernie has sucked all the oxygen and fundraising totals out of room. California and Beenie online fundraising doesnt give other candidates room to grow. Thats why otgers have fallen behind.

Its either donate to Sanders or Harris, Biden should have announced Feb and should Beto
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,128
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: March 04, 2019, 03:00:07 AM »
Quote from: Iowa more R than Ohio on March 02, 2019, 12:29:38 PM
People are really underestimating Biden. It’s definitely his race to lose if he decides to run.

I think he's overrated for the GE and a paper tiger. Not that I have something against him, but he has a lot of of stuff to attack. He could beat Trump, of course, but I wouldn't take this for granted.
Logged
UWS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,270


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: March 04, 2019, 07:17:05 AM »
Quote from: Excessively Caffeinated Coastal Elitist for Schultz on March 02, 2019, 02:57:30 PM
Quote from: Iowa more R than Ohio on March 02, 2019, 12:29:38 PM
People are really underestimating Biden. It’s definitely his race to lose if he decides to run.

Even if that's true (doubt it), he's a professional at losing presidential campaigns spectacularly.

If that was really the case, Obama would not have won 2 consecutive presidential campaigns in 2008 and 2012.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,328
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: March 04, 2019, 10:38:54 AM »
Quote from: UWS on March 04, 2019, 07:17:05 AM
Quote from: Excessively Caffeinated Coastal Elitist for Schultz on March 02, 2019, 02:57:30 PM
Quote from: Iowa more R than Ohio on March 02, 2019, 12:29:38 PM
People are really underestimating Biden. It’s definitely his race to lose if he decides to run.

Even if that's true (doubt it), he's a professional at losing presidential campaigns spectacularly.

If that was really the case, Obama would not have won 2 consecutive presidential campaigns in 2008 and 2012.

Because that was Obama, who was a great campaigner. Look up Biden’s runs in 1988 and 2008.
Logged
Sirius_
Ninja0428
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,121
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.00, S: -7.91


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: March 04, 2019, 10:57:36 AM »
We got all the talking points. The vague "scrutiny" that's going to happen. The "me too allegations" that have a 0.1% chance of existing. The idea that past candidacies determine future candidacies. The idea that not announcing over a year before the primaries start is going to doom you. This thread is like Atlas in a nutshell.
Logged
UWS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,270


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: March 04, 2019, 05:50:46 PM »
Quote from: Excessively Caffeinated Coastal Elitist for Schultz on March 04, 2019, 10:38:54 AM
Quote from: UWS on March 04, 2019, 07:17:05 AM
Quote from: Excessively Caffeinated Coastal Elitist for Schultz on March 02, 2019, 02:57:30 PM
Quote from: Iowa more R than Ohio on March 02, 2019, 12:29:38 PM
People are really underestimating Biden. It’s definitely his race to lose if he decides to run.

Even if that's true (doubt it), he's a professional at losing presidential campaigns spectacularly.

If that was really the case, Obama would not have won 2 consecutive presidential campaigns in 2008 and 2012.

Because that was Obama, who was a great campaigner. Look up Biden’s runs in 1988 and 2008.

And look to Biden’s 2008 VP candidacy during which he helped Obama attracting working-class voters.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,328
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: March 04, 2019, 07:10:44 PM »
Quote from: UWS on March 04, 2019, 05:50:46 PM
Quote from: Excessively Caffeinated Coastal Elitist for Schultz on March 04, 2019, 10:38:54 AM
Quote from: UWS on March 04, 2019, 07:17:05 AM
Quote from: Excessively Caffeinated Coastal Elitist for Schultz on March 02, 2019, 02:57:30 PM
Quote from: Iowa more R than Ohio on March 02, 2019, 12:29:38 PM
People are really underestimating Biden. It’s definitely his race to lose if he decides to run.

Even if that's true (doubt it), he's a professional at losing presidential campaigns spectacularly.

If that was really the case, Obama would not have won 2 consecutive presidential campaigns in 2008 and 2012.

Because that was Obama, who was a great campaigner. Look up Biden’s runs in 1988 and 2008.

And look to Biden’s 2008 VP candidacy during which he helped Obama attracting working-class voters.

To an extent, perhaps, but I think Obama's weakness with working-class voters was always overstated in 2008, and he was also helped enormously by the recession. Biden didn't get very far on his own in 2008. Sure, he could run a better campaign this time, but he tends to be very gaffe-prone, and I don't think that's going to help him.
Logged
here2view
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,695
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.13, S: -1.74

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: March 10, 2019, 11:35:19 AM »
Quote from: Beet on March 01, 2019, 03:09:36 PM
Biden's gonna collapse any minute now- that time he said something ham-handed in 1972 is doing him in even as I type this! -Atlas
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.217 seconds with 13 queries.