Who fits in the not so good of a president, but good VP category?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 09:43:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Who fits in the not so good of a president, but good VP category?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Who fits in the not so good of a president, but good VP category?  (Read 1611 times)
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,787


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 08, 2005, 05:32:22 PM »

hmm, anyone talk about VPs yet?
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2005, 05:41:17 PM »

I'd say Biden.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2005, 07:51:11 PM »

I guess you could argue that point for Mark Warner, but Im not buying.  Smiley
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2005, 08:05:54 PM »

Definetly. Also Obama (2008), Landrieu, Giuliani, Snowe might do okay.
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,746
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2005, 08:19:43 PM »

Gov. Bill Richardson (NM)
Gov. Tom Vilsack (IA)
Gov. Mark Warner (VA)
Sen. Joe Biden (DE)
Sen. Mary Landrieu (LA)
Sen. Blanche Lincoln (AR)
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2005, 08:20:54 PM »


Why is Vilsack so commonly mentioned as a VP, but never brought up as a Presidential candidate.
Logged
Speed of Sound
LiberalPA
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,166
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 08, 2005, 08:24:47 PM »


Why is Vilsack so commonly mentioned as a VP, but never brought up as a Presidential candidate.

'08 Dem Primary

Hillary Clinton    35%

John Kerry         13

Al Gore            10

John Edwards        7

Evan Bayh           5

Tom Vilsack         1 Wink
Logged
nini2287
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,616


Political Matrix
E: 2.77, S: -3.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 09, 2005, 10:59:59 PM »


Why is Vilsack so commonly mentioned as a VP, but never brought up as a Presidential candidate.

'08 Dem Primary

Hillary Clinton    35%

John Kerry         13

Al Gore            10

John Edwards        7

Evan Bayh           5

Tom Vilsack         1 Wink

That's more or less meaningless as Lieberman was leading in polls for awhile (I think even 6 months or so out of the Iowa primaries).
Logged
TheresNoMoney
Scoonie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,907


Political Matrix
E: -3.25, S: -2.72

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 09, 2005, 11:04:26 PM »

Wesley Clark, Barack Obama are my top two VP candidates.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,727
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 10, 2005, 02:10:15 AM »

Clark and Obama
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 10, 2005, 11:09:07 AM »

I don't understand why you like Clark.  Had he run for president in 2000, he'd have been a Republican.  He's a phony who became a Democrat as he saw a 2004 oppurtunity.

Mark Warner is the best option.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 10, 2005, 11:26:06 AM »

I don't understand why you like Clark.  Had he run for president in 2000, he'd have been a Republican.  He's a phony who became a Democrat as he saw a 2004 oppurtunity.

Thats false.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You could also argue that he ran on one of the most progressive platforms in the 2004 Democratic Primary.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 10, 2005, 11:28:46 AM »

I'm not concerned with his 2004 Democratic platform; it was a fabrication, a farce.  You can dig up all the Clark quotes you like, but remember, nobody can prove he voted for Reagan or Nixon or Carter or whoever.  we have to go by his word, which si a dangerous thing.  He's an oppurtunist and not a true Democrat.  I have no idea why the left likes him so much, they don't trust anybody, and he pulls 24% in a DKos straw poll.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 10, 2005, 11:31:00 AM »

He's an oppurtunist.

I have no idea why the left likes him so much, they don't trust anybody, and he pulls 24% in a DKos straw poll.

You wont get an arguement from me there.  I agree with those points, but your completely wrong to assume he was ever a Republican.  His voter registration states otherwise.
Logged
MissCatholic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,424


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 10, 2005, 11:32:28 AM »

Vilsack is from Iowa so has to be a good vp.

Rendell from PA so would be a good move if guiliani is nominated so the dems just have to focus on Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin.

Clark makes the ticket look more solid on the foreign policy front.

Feingold would be a great pick if Warner or Bayh get picked to solidify trhe base.

Lincoln and Landrieu would all make good picks.

Keep an eye on Salazar as he could be the future president. Plus hes beginning to take on Dobson.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 10, 2005, 11:35:54 AM »

He's an oppurtunist.

I have no idea why the left likes him so much, they don't trust anybody, and he pulls 24% in a DKos straw poll.

You wont get an arguement from me there.  I agree with those points, but your completely wrong to assume he was ever a Republican.  His voter registration states otherwise.

VOTER REGISTRATION ISN'T EVERYTHING.  He likely registered as independent to keep his options open. He's a smart man with ambitions and he knew keeping an 'I' was the smartest move so he could run under either party's nomination if the chances presented themselves.
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,977
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 10, 2005, 04:38:29 PM »

Clark
Feingold
Giuliani
Dole
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 10, 2005, 05:28:52 PM »

Governors Ehrlich and Rounds (and hopefully soon to be Nussle) would be fine Veep Choices.
Logged
Max Power
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,182
Political Matrix
E: 1.84, S: -8.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 10, 2005, 05:34:08 PM »

Actually, I think Senators and Ex-Senators are better VPs because they already have experience in the senate.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.228 seconds with 14 queries.