2016 WI: Jeb Bush vs Martin O'Malley - The most boring Election in History
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 08:35:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  2016 WI: Jeb Bush vs Martin O'Malley - The most boring Election in History
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2016 WI: Jeb Bush vs Martin O'Malley - The most boring Election in History  (Read 463 times)
Thunder98
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,574
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 25, 2018, 09:50:23 AM »
« edited: August 25, 2018, 09:54:32 AM by Thunder98 »

Jeb Bush wins the EC and PV by a very small margin.

Bush 275 (49.8%) - O'Malley 263 (49.6%)

Closest states:

Virginia: O'Malley 49.2% - Bush 49.0% (0.2%)
Colorado: O'Malley 48.9% - Bush 48.4% (0.5%)
Iowa: Bush 49.5% - O'Malley 48.6% (0.9%)
Nevada: Bush 49.5% - O'Malley 48.4% (1.1%)
Wisconsin: Bush 49.8% - O'Malley 48.3% (1.5%)
New Hampshire: O'Malley 49.0% - Bush 47.7% (1.3%)
Minnesota: O'Malley 49.2% - Bush 47.0% (2.2%)
New Mexico: O'Malley 49.9% - Bush 46.0% (3.9%)

Logged
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,123


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2018, 02:07:31 PM »

Flip Nevada, which you have as extremely close, and it's a 269-269 tie.  That would be fun.
Logged
I Can Now Die Happy
NYC Millennial Minority
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,949
United States
Political Matrix
E: 4.39, S: -4.70

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2018, 02:31:06 PM »
« Edited: August 26, 2018, 09:48:00 AM by NYC Millennial Minority »

Atlas likes to push this idea that 2016 was a year that really favored the GOP, but I honestly think it slightly favored the Democrats. I think NeverTrumpers and partisan Democrats who want to throw Hillary under the bus by pushing the idea that any Republican would have definitely beat her. It's pathetic, but whatever.

Generic GOP loses to Generic D every time in Presidential races now. Maybe my perspective is skewed from living in NYC, but the Kasichs, Rubios, and Jebs of the world come off as plastic robotic designated losers to me.  

Map at the minimum. 279 O'Malley -259 Jeb




Map if Jeb really screws up. 347 O'Malley - 191 Jeb


Logged
HisGrace
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,737
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2018, 08:47:51 PM »

They're "boring" but way better than the two candidates we got.

Map would have been about the same.
Logged
Lechasseur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,802


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2018, 01:33:09 AM »

Atlas likes to push this idea that 2016 was a year that really favored the GOP, but I honestly think it slightly favored the Democrats. I think NeverTrumpers and partisan Democrats who want to throw Hillary under the bus like pushing the idea that any Republican would have definitely beat her. It's pathetic, but whatever.

Generic GOP loses to Generic D every time in Presidential races now. Maybe my perspective is skewed from living in NYC, but the Kasichs, Rubios, and Jebs of the world come off as plastic robotic designated losers to me.  

Map at the minimum. 279 O'Malley -259 Jeb




Map if Jeb really screws up. 347 O'Malley - 191 Jeb




I agree with you that 2016 favored the Democrats, I think any Republican other than Trump would have lost to Clinton. On the other hand, O'Malley was a very weak candidate thus I agree with the OP that Jeb would have narrowly beaten him.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.23 seconds with 11 queries.