MA-GOV: Who will challenge Baker?

[smoltchanov]

Can you at least stop the "If you don't like Baker you're a partisan hack" charade?

I never used the word "hack". But you are, obviously, very partisan Democrat. While i am not. Feel the difference

BTW - what's Baker rating NOW?

[Figueira]

Can you at least stop the "If you don't like Baker you're a partisan hack" charade?

I never used the word "hack". But you are, obviously, very partisan Democrat. While i am not. Feel the difference

Well yes, but my dislike of Baker is not because I am a partisan Democrat.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Nice Argumentum ad populum there.

[smoltchanov]

If i remember correctly - something about 70-20. And i am forced to take back my words: of these 20% majority are, probably, "partisan Democratic hacks". Few percent of Greens and left Indies, even fewer - far-right Republicans and conservative Indies, but other - .......

[Figueira]

If i remember correctly - something about 70-20. And i am forced to take back my words: of these 20% majority are, probably, "partisan Democratic hacks". Few percent of Greens and left Indies, even fewer - far-right Republicans and conservative Indies, but other - .......

Not really sure what your point is. Anyway, I am a proud member of the 20% or whatever. Also notice that you start going on this crusade against anyone who dares to criticize Flawless Beautiful Charlie as soon as you lost the argument about his policies.

[smoltchanov]

If i remember correctly - something about 70-20. And i am forced to take back my words: of these 20% majority are, probably, "partisan Democratic hacks". Few percent of Greens and left Indies, even fewer - far-right Republicans and conservative Indies, but other - .......

Not really sure what your point is. Anyway, I am a proud member of the 20% or whatever. Also notice that you start going on this crusade against anyone who dares to criticize Flawless Beautiful Charlie as soon as you lost the argument about his policies.

Naturally. I like him. We are close ideologically, so why i must not? Partisan Democrats begin their crusades as soon as someone criticizes Obama, Clinton, Pelosi or party. Why must i be different?

[Figueira]

If i remember correctly - something about 70-20. And i am forced to take back my words: of these 20% majority are, probably, "partisan Democratic hacks". Few percent of Greens and left Indies, even fewer - far-right Republicans and conservative Indies, but other - .......

Not really sure what your point is. Anyway, I am a proud member of the 20% or whatever. Also notice that you start going on this crusade against anyone who dares to criticize Flawless Beautiful Charlie as soon as you lost the argument about his policies.

Naturally. I like him. We are close ideologically, so why i must not? Partisan Democrats begin their crusades as soon as someone criticizes Obama, Clinton, Pelosi or party. Why must i be different?

I mean, I don't accuse people of being partisan hacks with no values whenever someone criticizes those people.

[smoltchanov]

If i remember correctly - something about 70-20. And i am forced to take back my words: of these 20% majority are, probably, "partisan Democratic hacks". Few percent of Greens and left Indies, even fewer - far-right Republicans and conservative Indies, but other - .......

Not really sure what your point is. Anyway, I am a proud member of the 20% or whatever. Also notice that you start going on this crusade against anyone who dares to criticize Flawless Beautiful Charlie as soon as you lost the argument about his policies.

Naturally. I like him. We are close ideologically, so why i must not? Partisan Democrats begin their crusades as soon as someone criticizes Obama, Clinton, Pelosi or party. Why must i be different?

I mean, I don't accuse people of being partisan hacks with no values whenever someone criticizes those people.

You may have values and be partisan hack, no? IMHO, in fact majority of hacks have exceedingly strong values, but they are hacks in a sense that they are interested in their party (and it's political dominance) only, people's desire notwithstanding...

[Figueira]

If i remember correctly - something about 70-20. And i am forced to take back my words: of these 20% majority are, probably, "partisan Democratic hacks". Few percent of Greens and left Indies, even fewer - far-right Republicans and conservative Indies, but other - .......

Not really sure what your point is. Anyway, I am a proud member of the 20% or whatever. Also notice that you start going on this crusade against anyone who dares to criticize Flawless Beautiful Charlie as soon as you lost the argument about his policies.

Naturally. I like him. We are close ideologically, so why i must not? Partisan Democrats begin their crusades as soon as someone criticizes Obama, Clinton, Pelosi or party. Why must i be different?

I mean, I don't accuse people of being partisan hacks with no values whenever someone criticizes those people.

You may have values and be partisan hack, no? IMHO, in fact majority of hacks have exceedingly strong values, but they are hacks in a sense that they are interested in their party (and it's political dominance) only, people's desire notwithstanding...

Are you suggesting that I should like Charlie Baker just because other people like Charlie Baker? What if some of those 70% just like him because other people do?

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

If i remember correctly - something about 70-20. And i am forced to take back my words: of these 20% majority are, probably, "partisan Democratic hacks". Few percent of Greens and left Indies, even fewer - far-right Republicans and conservative Indies, but other - .......

Not really sure what your point is. Anyway, I am a proud member of the 20% or whatever. Also notice that you start going on this crusade against anyone who dares to criticize Flawless Beautiful Charlie as soon as you lost the argument about his policies.

Naturally. I like him. We are close ideologically, so why i must not? Partisan Democrats begin their crusades as soon as someone criticizes Obama, Clinton, Pelosi or party. Why must i be different?

I mean, I don't accuse people of being partisan hacks with no values whenever someone criticizes those people.

You may have values and be partisan hack, no? IMHO, in fact majority of hacks have exceedingly strong values, but they are hacks in a sense that they are interested in their party (and it's political dominance) only, people's desire notwithstanding...

Charlie Baker is not all that good, and he would lose if given a serious opponent. Sadly, I don't think he will get one.

[Figueira]

God Smilo, you're such a Democratic hack.

[smoltchanov]

If i remember correctly - something about 70-20. And i am forced to take back my words: of these 20% majority are, probably, "partisan Democratic hacks". Few percent of Greens and left Indies, even fewer - far-right Republicans and conservative Indies, but other - .......

Not really sure what your point is. Anyway, I am a proud member of the 20% or whatever. Also notice that you start going on this crusade against anyone who dares to criticize Flawless Beautiful Charlie as soon as you lost the argument about his policies.

Naturally. I like him. We are close ideologically, so why i must not? Partisan Democrats begin their crusades as soon as someone criticizes Obama, Clinton, Pelosi or party. Why must i be different?

I mean, I don't accuse people of being partisan hacks with no values whenever someone criticizes those people.

You may have values and be partisan hack, no? IMHO, in fact majority of hacks have exceedingly strong values, but they are hacks in a sense that they are interested in their party (and it's political dominance) only, people's desire notwithstanding...

Charlie Baker is not all that good, and he would lose if given a serious opponent. Sadly, I don't think he will get one.

Only serious?)))) That will not be enough)))

[smoltchanov]

If i remember correctly - something about 70-20. And i am forced to take back my words: of these 20% majority are, probably, "partisan Democratic hacks". Few percent of Greens and left Indies, even fewer - far-right Republicans and conservative Indies, but other - .......

Not really sure what your point is. Anyway, I am a proud member of the 20% or whatever. Also notice that you start going on this crusade against anyone who dares to criticize Flawless Beautiful Charlie as soon as you lost the argument about his policies.

Naturally. I like him. We are close ideologically, so why i must not? Partisan Democrats begin their crusades as soon as someone criticizes Obama, Clinton, Pelosi or party. Why must i be different?

I mean, I don't accuse people of being partisan hacks with no values whenever someone criticizes those people.

You may have values and be partisan hack, no? IMHO, in fact majority of hacks have exceedingly strong values, but they are hacks in a sense that they are interested in their party (and it's political dominance) only, people's desire notwithstanding...

Are you suggesting that I should like Charlie Baker just because other people like Charlie Baker? What if some of those 70% just like him because other people do?

No. It's your business. And some people really like him because other tell he is good. But i doubt that percentage of such people is high..

[Figueira]

If i remember correctly - something about 70-20. And i am forced to take back my words: of these 20% majority are, probably, "partisan Democratic hacks". Few percent of Greens and left Indies, even fewer - far-right Republicans and conservative Indies, but other - .......

Not really sure what your point is. Anyway, I am a proud member of the 20% or whatever. Also notice that you start going on this crusade against anyone who dares to criticize Flawless Beautiful Charlie as soon as you lost the argument about his policies.

Naturally. I like him. We are close ideologically, so why i must not? Partisan Democrats begin their crusades as soon as someone criticizes Obama, Clinton, Pelosi or party. Why must i be different?

I mean, I don't accuse people of being partisan hacks with no values whenever someone criticizes those people.

You may have values and be partisan hack, no? IMHO, in fact majority of hacks have exceedingly strong values, but they are hacks in a sense that they are interested in their party (and it's political dominance) only, people's desire notwithstanding...

Are you suggesting that I should like Charlie Baker just because other people like Charlie Baker? What if some of those 70% just like him because other people do?

No. It's your business. And some people really like him because other tell he is good. But i doubt that percentage of such people is high..

I doubt it as well (I think it's more because no one really knows anything bad about him) but it would be high if everyone followed your logic.

[smoltchanov]

If i remember correctly - something about 70-20. And i am forced to take back my words: of these 20% majority are, probably, "partisan Democratic hacks". Few percent of Greens and left Indies, even fewer - far-right Republicans and conservative Indies, but other - .......

Not really sure what your point is. Anyway, I am a proud member of the 20% or whatever. Also notice that you start going on this crusade against anyone who dares to criticize Flawless Beautiful Charlie as soon as you lost the argument about his policies.

Naturally. I like him. We are close ideologically, so why i must not? Partisan Democrats begin their crusades as soon as someone criticizes Obama, Clinton, Pelosi or party. Why must i be different?

I mean, I don't accuse people of being partisan hacks with no values whenever someone criticizes those people.

You may have values and be partisan hack, no? IMHO, in fact majority of hacks have exceedingly strong values, but they are hacks in a sense that they are interested in their party (and it's political dominance) only, people's desire notwithstanding...

Are you suggesting that I should like Charlie Baker just because other people like Charlie Baker? What if some of those 70% just like him because other people do?

No. It's your business. And some people really like him because other tell he is good. But i doubt that percentage of such people is high..

I doubt it as well (I think it's more because no one really knows anything bad about him) but it would be high if everyone followed your logic.

It's MY logic. Which serves ME well. I don't pretend it to be everyone's logic...