Video tapes vs. Wikieleak Dumps-whigh does the most damage?

[PRESIDENT STANTON]

My question to others on this forum; goes as follows, considering what happened last Friday with the Trump "lewdgate" tape, and the continuous wikie leak dumps; which will prove more damaging to the electoral prospects of both Clinton and Trump? My take is that Clinton will not weather this tit-for-tat revelation; hope I'm wrong; this is like a reality TV program.

[Yank2133]

Lmao this isn't even debatable.

It is the tapes.

[ApatheticAustrian]

tapes are an atomic bomb.

wikileaks is chinese water torture.

maybe the have SOME impact on the longest run....but the tapes are far more dangerous...cause you need much less context.

[dspNY]

My question to others on this forum; goes as follows, considering what happened last Friday with the Trump "lewdgate" tape, and the continuous wikie leak dumps; which will prove more damaging to the electoral prospects of both Clinton and Trump? My take is that Clinton will not weather this tit-for-tat revelation; hope I'm wrong; this is like a reality TV program.

Unless there is something supremely damaging, the tapes are easily worse...the only real bombshell revelation in the Wikileaks email dump is Podesta's risotto recipe

[Meclazine for Israel]

Depends on the Wikileak.

If the 33,000 emails surface with CIA secrets, things could get exciting.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

It'll be really hard for the wikileaks to top the tapes. I'm not holding my breath.

[Southern Delegate matthew27]

The tapes are a thousand times more damaging...The media has pretty much bitched about the emails and about these leaks for the past 2 years straight...People are sick of them.

[rafta_rafta]

The biggest risk of wikileaks is that it will keep dripping over slow news days and depresses turnout.

[dspNY]

The biggest risk of wikileaks is that it will keep dripping over slow news days and depresses turnout.

There won't be a lot of those in the last month of an American presidential election