NV-Review Journal: Heck +2
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 10:14:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  NV-Review Journal: Heck +2
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NV-Review Journal: Heck +2  (Read 934 times)
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 02, 2016, 02:02:54 PM »

47% Joe Heck (R)
45% Catherine Cortez Masto (D)

Bendixen & Amandi International conducted the poll between Sep. 27 and Sept. 29 in English and Spanish. It has a margin of error of 3.5 percent either direction.

http://www.reviewjournal.com/politics/election-2016/nevada-poll-shows-joe-heck-and-catherine-cortez-masto-are-close-race-us-sen
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2016, 02:11:47 PM »

Good to see Heck up in a poll with Spanish options, only 8% said neither, some will likely vote for Nevada's famous "None of These Candidates" option. I really hope he wins. As it has been a great week for Hillary maybe he can gain an extra two points or so in the coming weeks. This will really be a nail biter, that's for sure.
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,565
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2016, 02:34:02 PM »

I'm not gonna unskew, but there are a lot of problems with this poll, including this:

Ralston also said that this poll's LV screen requires that you have voted in the last 3(!!!) cycles. The fact that Clinton is winning Heck is barely leading with that is amazing in itself.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2016, 02:36:36 PM »

Yeah, the likely voter screen is probably far too tight.
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,980
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2016, 02:37:03 PM »

Heck is already at the % Heller got, and we still have a month left to go. Still a Toss-Up but Masto is running out of time.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,325
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 02, 2016, 02:43:06 PM »

As I've said before, if Heck is overperforming Trump by 5-6%, he has a decent shot at winning. More than that, and I wouldn't hold my breath for Masto. If he's only overperforming Trump by 2-3%, though, I think Masto wins. This race is competitive, but if the final RCP average is Heck+1 or 2, Republicans should be worried.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,386
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2016, 03:46:57 PM »

As I've said before, if Heck is overperforming Trump by 5-6%, he has a decent shot at winning. More than that, and I wouldn't hold my breath for Masto. If he's only overperforming Trump by 2-3%, though, I think Masto wins. This race is competitive, but if the final RCP average is Heck+1 or 2, Republicans should be worried.

This poll suggests that he's overperforming by 3. So that doesn't seem too bad, right? Nevada is a State where I think polls seriously underestimate Democrats.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,574
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 02, 2016, 04:25:09 PM »

I'm not gonna unskew, but there are a lot of problems with this poll, including this:

Ralston also said that this poll's LV screen requires that you have voted in the last 3(!!!) cycles. The fact that Clinton is winning Heck is barely leading with that is amazing in itself.

It's not unskewing to critique the methoglogical design of a poll. Requiring that you have voted in the last 3 cycles is way to strict and a great sign for both Clinton and Masto.
Logged
Heisenberg
SecureAmerica
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 02, 2016, 04:46:23 PM »

I'm not gonna unskew, but there are a lot of problems with this poll, including this:

Ralston also said that this poll's LV screen requires that you have voted in the last 3(!!!) cycles. The fact that Clinton is winning Heck is barely leading with that is amazing in itself.
It's not unskewing to critique the methoglogical design of a poll. Requiring that you have voted in the last 3 cycles is way to strict and a great sign for both Clinton and Masto.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
From my understanding, newly registered voters were also included. Or am I wrong?
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,565
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 02, 2016, 05:53:55 PM »

I'm not gonna unskew, but there are a lot of problems with this poll, including this:

Ralston also said that this poll's LV screen requires that you have voted in the last 3(!!!) cycles. The fact that Clinton is winning Heck is barely leading with that is amazing in itself.
It's not unskewing to critique the methoglogical design of a poll. Requiring that you have voted in the last 3 cycles is way to strict and a great sign for both Clinton and Masto.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
From my understanding, newly registered voters were also included. Or am I wrong?


That doesn't mean they'd make it through the LV screen.

Besides, this Adelson poll hasn't released their questionnaire and crosstabs like a normal pollster would.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 03, 2016, 07:29:05 PM »

Masto and Ross are the two candidates that I currently expect to win despite the polls saying otherwise, but I'm not very confident about either of those. On the other side, I think Todd Young has a much better chance than polls would suggest, although I predict Bayh will eke out a narrow victory.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.226 seconds with 12 queries.