National: Gravis/Breitbart - Trump +5 (2-way); Changed Undecideds go Trump 52-29

[Ebsy]

This isn't a poll of registered/likely voters so the topline number is meaningless.

[SirMuxALot]

Maybe title should be changed to reflect the headline numbers are about who won the poll, not how respondents will vote.

[Maxwell]

Uh oh.  The Atlas echo chamber confirmation bias rears its ugly head.

Some people might not like Gravis' methdology, but they called 890 more random people than anyone in the debate night thread did.

Gravis is not a good pollster, and 55% of people they picked being conservative proves it. There's no confirmation bias just look at the numbers.

[Alaska2392]

Sorry, I must be a little statistically challenged.

What is the second chart in Question 10B showing us exactly?  How is it different than the first chart?

The first chart says 95% of people had the same opinion, Undecided-to-Trump 2%, etc., etc.

Is the second one just the same thing in more detail?