Can Hillary carry 40 or more states states?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 05:05:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Can Hillary carry 40 or more states states?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Can Hillary carry 40 or more states states?  (Read 5588 times)
Old Man Willow
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,699
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: May 02, 2014, 02:46:13 PM »


I'd think if your map comes true, WV would surely flip.  IMO, the Obama years weren't a trend, they were an exception.  That's still a Democratic state at heart, and they love Hillary.

As I pointed out in the AR poll thread, they despise her these days: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=179653.0
Logged
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Pessimistic Antineutrino
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,896
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: May 02, 2014, 03:15:10 PM »

Historically, polls a few years out actually do give an accurate picture.

That's not true at all.

Sure it is.

Ummm….remember Carter's lead in the 1980 campaign, or Dukakis's lead in 1988, or Bush's lead after the Gulf War (or heck, Perot's lead in May 1992), or how about how McCain was leading every Democratic candidate in 2006?


Perot lost that lead because he dropped out for 3 months.

Exactly. You can't always predict what will happen, especially so far out. I bet no one predicted Perot's candidacy to begin with.

Answering the question, no. Only if the GOP candidate as absolutely awful, in which case they wouldn't be nominated anyway. We can't jump to conclusions before the 2014 primary season is over.
Logged
BaconBacon96
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,678
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: May 02, 2014, 03:46:08 PM »
« Edited: May 02, 2014, 07:10:10 PM by NE Representative BaconBacon96 »

If the Republicans nominate the right candidate, than sure...



Hillary Clinton-455
Ted Nugent-83/b]

I'm not in anyway saying that Nugent will get the nomination or even run for it, but he's the kind of guy they would have to nominate for Hillary to do so well.
Logged
JRP1994
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,048


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: May 22, 2016, 08:35:26 AM »

Clearly she can. Trump is obviously a joke candidate with no real chance of winning.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,275
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: May 22, 2016, 08:36:20 AM »

Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,212
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: May 22, 2016, 08:38:39 AM »
« Edited: May 22, 2016, 08:55:25 AM by Ljube »


Yeah, those posts were made just a couple of days before Indiana.

Hillary hacks should try to be a bit more restrained and the forum will increase in quality significantly.


EDIT: Just saw it was May 2014. My bad. But the remark about the Hillary hacks still stays.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: May 22, 2016, 08:46:03 AM »

Historically, polls a few years out actually do give an accurate picture.

That's not true at all.

Sure it is.

Ummm….remember Carter's lead in the 1980 campaign, or Dukakis's lead in 1988, or Bush's lead after the Gulf War (or heck, Perot's lead in May 1992), or how about how McCain was leading every Democratic candidate in 2006?


Perot lost that lead because he dropped out for 3 months.

Actually, he lost that lead just before he dropped out.  Perot was leading in May 1992, but then it shifted into something like a 3-way tie in June, and then when the DNC began in July, the first poll to be released after the convention started showed Clinton gaining a significant lead with Perot dropping fast.  Perot dropped out shortly thereafter.

In any case, the point is that the polls jumped around quite a bit in 1992, just as they have in many other presidential elections.  There's no reason why you should take one snapshot in time more than 2 years before the election, and pretend that that tells you how the election is going to turn out.


I was proved right about the polls changing during the course of the campaign.  I will now accept my accolades.  Tongue
Logged
bumpercrop
Rookie
**
Posts: 49


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: May 22, 2016, 09:19:09 AM »

She still could. We have 5 months left.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,327
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: May 22, 2016, 09:45:22 AM »

Just no
Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: May 22, 2016, 10:25:41 AM »

Logged
Consciously Unconscious
Liberty Republican
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,453
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: May 22, 2016, 10:41:35 AM »

Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,136
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: May 22, 2016, 10:56:56 AM »

40 states is hard.

I have AL, WV, KY, AR, OK, NE, SD, KA, ND, WY, ID. Even if she wins Utah, and Arkansas, that only gets her to exactly 40.
Logged
ProudModerate2
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,539
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: May 22, 2016, 11:37:59 AM »


Yeah, those posts were made just a couple of days before Indiana.
Hillary hacks should try to be a bit more restrained and the forum will increase in quality significantly.

EDIT: Just saw it was May 2014. My bad. But the remark about the Hillary hacks still stays.

Ohhhh, OK Ljube.
Keep posting ..... we know how much your posts "increase the quality" of this forum.
Your comments are the best thing since the invention of slice bread.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,069
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: May 22, 2016, 11:46:33 AM »

Ice Spear never thought Hillary would win RACIST West Virginia.  They aren't real Democrats.
Logged
LLR
LongLiveRock
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,956


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: May 22, 2016, 11:50:39 AM »



This is the most likely (39+DC). If you mean 40 states w/o DC, flip UT or AR.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: May 22, 2016, 06:03:18 PM »

Ice Spear never thought Hillary would win RACIST West Virginia.  They aren't real Democrats.

Huh. This thread actually genuinely surprised me. I never remembered including West Virginia in any of the many, many "Hillary ceiling" maps I made in 2014-2015, just Arkansas. This one must have been an outlier. Touche though, you got me. Tongue

I do find it hilarious that my post was prefaced by "if the GOP nominated someone like Trump or Bachmann", LMAO. Oh silly 2014 IceSpear, thinking candidate quality was a far bigger factor than it actually is...
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,096
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: May 22, 2016, 06:15:27 PM »

A Republican is guaranteed to carry 13-17 states even if he loses 60/40.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.232 seconds with 14 queries.