GE: Sanders vs. Rubio
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 08:24:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  GE: Sanders vs. Rubio
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: GE: Sanders vs. Rubio  (Read 1850 times)
Senator Spark
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,698
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 27, 2016, 05:08:17 PM »

Hypothetical. Discuss with maps
Logged
standwrand
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 592
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.55, S: -2.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2016, 05:18:06 PM »


um, no
Logged
YaBoyNY
NYMillennial
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,469
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2016, 05:20:58 PM »


Yes. In fact, I think TN Vol is being generous to Rubio.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2016, 05:23:17 PM »

^Rubio is a terrible candidate. He'd do worse than Trump.

Sanders would win in a landslide against Rubio, but lose in a landslide against TRUMP.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2016, 05:31:34 PM »

^Rubio is a terrible candidate. He'd do worse than Trump.

Sanders would win in a landslide against Rubio, but lose in a landslide against TRUMP.

Great Atlas analysis.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2016, 05:47:10 PM »

^Rubio is a terrible candidate. He'd do worse than Trump.

Sanders would win in a landslide against Rubio, but lose in a landslide against TRUMP.

Great Atlas analysis.

Thank you!
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,936


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2016, 06:08:54 PM »

Bernie wins every midwestern/Great Lakes swing state, which is enough for him to win.
Logged
Senator Spark
Spark498
Atlas Politician
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,698
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2016, 06:12:04 PM »

I have to disagree.. I think Rubio could potentially win PA & MI. IA and CO have been trending Republican but Rubio still would lose to Sanders in VA due to the DC suburbs. Are NV & NM in play?
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,217
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2016, 06:13:43 PM »

^Rubio is a terrible candidate. He'd do worse than Trump.

Sanders would win in a landslide against Rubio, but lose in a landslide against TRUMP.

Trump has the highest floor and the lowest ceiling. Rubio has exposed himself to be a weak candidate and an empty suit who more than likely will make a campaign-ending gaffe on the campaign trail.
Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2016, 08:42:52 PM »



Marco Rubio - 307 EV (51% PV)
Bernie Sanders - 231 EV (47% PV)
Logged
Orthogonian Society Treasurer
CommanderClash
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,561
Bermuda


Political Matrix
E: 0.32, S: 4.78

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2016, 08:47:42 PM »

Best case scenario for Rubio:



Pennsylvania would decide the election.
Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2016, 08:55:14 PM »

Best case scenario for Rubio:



Pennsylvania would decide the election.

Best case scenario he can't even win Colorado or Iowa? How do you explain that?
Logged
Orthogonian Society Treasurer
CommanderClash
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,561
Bermuda


Political Matrix
E: 0.32, S: 4.78

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 27, 2016, 08:58:09 PM »

Best case scenario for Rubio:



Pennsylvania would decide the election.

Best case scenario he can't even win Colorado or Iowa? How do you explain that?

As a candidate, Sanders is practically tailor-made for well-meaning midwesterners as well as civic libertarians in Colorado.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 27, 2016, 09:03:26 PM »

Comrade Sanders's best case scenario:


He'd get slaughtered worse than he did tonight in South Carolina.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 27, 2016, 11:09:18 PM »

Comrade Sanders's best case scenario:


He'd get slaughtered worse than he did tonight in South Carolina.

This map is correct.

It would be Reagan vs Mondale all over again.

In fact, Hawaii may go for Rubio also.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 27, 2016, 11:13:28 PM »

Comrade Sanders's best case scenario:


He'd get slaughtered worse than he did tonight in South Carolina.

This map is correct.

It would be Reagan vs Mondale all over again.

In fact, Hawaii may go for Rubio also.
I agree that Hawaii would also be likely Rubio, but I said  "best case" scenario.
Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 27, 2016, 11:14:27 PM »

Comrade Sanders's best case scenario:


He'd get slaughtered worse than he did tonight in South Carolina.

This map is correct.

It would be Reagan vs Mondale all over again.

In fact, Hawaii may go for Rubio also.
I agree that Hawaii would also be likely Rubio, but I said  "best case" scenario.

The blacks hate Sanders, DC would go to Rubio because of record low turnout for Dems.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 27, 2016, 11:15:05 PM »

Comrade Sanders's best case scenario:


He'd get slaughtered worse than he did tonight in South Carolina.

This map is correct.

It would be Reagan vs Mondale all over again.

In fact, Hawaii may go for Rubio also.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

...

Oh wait, you guys are serious?

If TNVolunteer realizes how horrible your predictions are, you need to take a step back, take a good, long look at yourself, and find out how you stooped so low.
Logged
Clark Kent
ClarkKent
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,480
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 27, 2016, 11:18:27 PM »

Comrade Sanders's best case scenario:


He'd get slaughtered worse than he did tonight in South Carolina.

This map is correct.

It would be Reagan vs Mondale all over again.

In fact, Hawaii may go for Rubio also.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

...

Oh wait, you guys are serious?

If TNVolunteer realizes how horrible your predictions are, you need to take a step back, take a good, long look at yourself, and find out how you stooped so low.
Well, TNvolunteer also thinks that New Hampshire is a solid Democratic state, so I don't really put much stock into his predictions. He's a nice guy, but...
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 27, 2016, 11:21:06 PM »

Comrade Sanders's best case scenario:


He'd get slaughtered worse than he did tonight in South Carolina.

You may actually be the most wrong person on this forum. You thought Trump would get 10% in Iowa. Your predictions suck.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: February 27, 2016, 11:29:51 PM »

Comrade Sanders's best case scenario:


He'd get slaughtered worse than he did tonight in South Carolina.

This map is correct.

It would be Reagan vs Mondale all over again.

In fact, Hawaii may go for Rubio also.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

...

Oh wait, you guys are serious?

If TNVolunteer realizes how horrible your predictions are, you need to take a step back, take a good, long look at yourself, and find out how you stooped so low.
Well, TNvolunteer also thinks that New Hampshire is a solid Democratic state, so I don't really put much stock into his predictions. He's a nice guy, but...

Exactly. Even he, of all people, realizes that that map will never happen in such a polarized era.
Logged
5280
MagneticFree
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,404
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.97, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: February 28, 2016, 03:11:29 AM »

Complete blowout for Rubio. Some Republican states will hit above 60% of the vote for him.

Sanders: 209
Rubio: 329

Logged
Slow Learner
Battenberg
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,022
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: February 28, 2016, 03:46:15 AM »

Comrade Sanders's best case scenario:


He'd get slaughtered worse than he did tonight in South Carolina.

You may actually be the most wrong person on this forum. You thought Trump would get 10% in Iowa. Your predictions suck.

BACK THE FYCK UP WHAT
Logged
Orthogonian Society Treasurer
CommanderClash
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,561
Bermuda


Political Matrix
E: 0.32, S: 4.78

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: February 28, 2016, 03:48:57 AM »
« Edited: February 28, 2016, 04:45:58 AM by clash »

Comrade Sanders's best case scenario:


He'd get slaughtered worse than he did tonight in South Carolina.

You may actually be the most wrong person on this forum. You thought Trump would get 10% in Iowa. Your predictions suck.

BACK THE FYCK UP WHAT

Folks like Superman and Winfield are living in their own private reality where it is always 1984. It's a problem endemic to the Republican party.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.28 seconds with 11 queries.