Is this a likely results for NH?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 08:20:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Is this a likely results for NH?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is this a likely results for NH?  (Read 487 times)
Vern
vern1988
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.30, S: -0.70

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 09, 2016, 12:15:36 PM »

Trump: 19
Rubio: 15
Cruz: 19
Kasich: 15
Bush: 14
Christie: 14
Fiorina: 2
Carson: 2
Gilmore: 0

They have said all day that Trump has no ground game and it will hurt him. The Governors do well, and Cruz gets a lot of the 2012 Paul voters...
Logged
PresidentTRUMP
2016election
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 945


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2016, 12:17:13 PM »

No, I don't believe so, because Trump % is way to low IMO. I think he will be around 28%. If he finished under 20% than when the field shrinks he is toast but I don't believe that will happen tonight.
Logged
#TheShadowyAbyss
TheShadowyAbyss
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,033
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -3.64

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2016, 12:21:04 PM »

No, I don't believe so, because Trump % is way to low IMO. I think he will be around 28%. If he finished under 20% than when the field shrinks he is toast but I don't believe that will happen tonight.

He severely underperformed his numbers in Iowa, I would expect him to do the same in NH
Logged
pho
iheartpho
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 852
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -1.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2016, 12:21:16 PM »

Cruz getting 19% seems really far fetched, New Hampshire is the worst kind of state for smooth talking televangelist types like Ted Cruz. He's mentally checked out to South Carolina for a reason.
Logged
Vern
vern1988
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.30, S: -0.70

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 09, 2016, 12:24:02 PM »

Cruz getting 19% seems really far fetched, New Hampshire is the worst kind of state for smooth talking televangelist types like Ted Cruz. He's mentally checked out to South Carolina for a reason.


You can move the number totals around however one sees fit, my point is no-one hits 20% due to most candidates getting double dights.
Logged
pho
iheartpho
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 852
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -1.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2016, 12:30:13 PM »

Cruz getting 19% seems really far fetched, New Hampshire is the worst kind of state for smooth talking televangelist types like Ted Cruz. He's mentally checked out to South Carolina for a reason.


You can move the number totals around however one sees fit, my point is no-one hits 20% due to most candidates getting double dights.

Still doubtful. Christie, Cruz, and Rubio (guessing here) are going to perform poorly and there will be plenty of the vote to go around to push someone over 20%.
Logged
sportydude
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 589


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2016, 12:32:25 PM »

No, I don't believe so, because Trump % is way to low IMO. I think he will be around 28%. If he finished under 20% than when the field shrinks he is toast but I don't believe that will happen tonight.

He severely underperformed his numbers in Iowa, I would expect him to do the same in NH

Actually, Trump didn't underperform in Iowa, Cruz rather outperformed.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2016, 12:35:33 PM »

No, I don't believe so, because Trump % is way to low IMO. I think he will be around 28%. If he finished under 20% than when the field shrinks he is toast but I don't believe that will happen tonight.

He severely underperformed his numbers in Iowa, I would expect him to do the same in NH

He didn't underperform by that much though. His final RCP average in Iowa was lower than his current one in New Hampshire, so why should he do much worse in New Hampshire than he did in Iowa?

Anyway, it's within the realm of possibility, but it's hard to believe that Trump would do that badly.
Logged
Vern
vern1988
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.30, S: -0.70

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2016, 01:00:28 PM »

No, I don't believe so, because Trump % is way to low IMO. I think he will be around 28%. If he finished under 20% than when the field shrinks he is toast but I don't believe that will happen tonight.

He severely underperformed his numbers in Iowa, I would expect him to do the same in NH

He didn't underperform by that much though. His final RCP average in Iowa was lower than his current one in New Hampshire, so why should he do much worse in New Hampshire than he did in Iowa?

Anyway, it's within the realm of possibility, but it's hard to believe that Trump would do that badly.

From what they are saying a lot of Independents are undecided between Trump and Sanders. If for some reason a lot of them end up voting for Sanders instead of Trump then Trump's numbers could see a big drop..
Logged
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2016, 01:46:00 PM »

No, I don't believe so, because Trump % is way to low IMO. I think he will be around 28%. If he finished under 20% than when the field shrinks he is toast but I don't believe that will happen tonight.

He severely underperformed his numbers in Iowa, I would expect him to do the same in NH

He didn't underperform by that much though. His final RCP average in Iowa was lower than his current one in New Hampshire, so why should he do much worse in New Hampshire than he did in Iowa?

Anyway, it's within the realm of possibility, but it's hard to believe that Trump would do that badly.

From what they are saying a lot of Independents are undecided between Trump and Sanders. If for some reason a lot of them end up voting for Sanders instead of Trump then Trump's numbers could see a big drop..

Even if this is true it seems like Sanders has the state under lockdown, so people are more likely to vote in the contested Republican primary.
Logged
#TheShadowyAbyss
TheShadowyAbyss
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,033
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -3.64

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2016, 01:48:05 PM »

No, I don't believe so, because Trump % is way to low IMO. I think he will be around 28%. If he finished under 20% than when the field shrinks he is toast but I don't believe that will happen tonight.

He severely underperformed his numbers in Iowa, I would expect him to do the same in NH

He didn't underperform by that much though. His final RCP average in Iowa was lower than his current one in New Hampshire, so why should he do much worse in New Hampshire than he did in Iowa?

Anyway, it's within the realm of possibility, but it's hard to believe that Trump would do that badly.

From what they are saying a lot of Independents are undecided between Trump and Sanders. If for some reason a lot of them end up voting for Sanders instead of Trump then Trump's numbers could see a big drop..

Well, from interviews I've seen they were torn between Kasich and Sanders
Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,655


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2016, 02:33:23 PM »

Trump: 19
Rubio: 15
Cruz: 19
Kasich: 15
Bush: 14
Christie: 14
Fiorina: 2
Carson: 2
Gilmore: 0

They have said all day that Trump has no ground game and it will hurt him. The Governors do well, and Cruz gets a lot of the 2012 Paul voters...

Possible? Yes. Likely? No, in my opinion. Trump will not do quite that poorly, nor, I suspect, will Cruz, Rubio, and Christie do that well.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,568
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2016, 03:14:59 PM »

TRUMP won't be below 20% or even 25%. The worst result I see for him is 27%. It's quite possible that he cracks 30%.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 09, 2016, 03:16:59 PM »

Trump's appeal is more obvious in New Hampshire than it is in Iowa, he will perform at least 3% better than he did in Iowa. That's why I predict Trump gets 27% even as polls show him in the mid 30s.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,568
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 09, 2016, 03:18:37 PM »

Trump's appeal is more obvious in New Hampshire than it is in Iowa, he will perform at least 3% better than he did in Iowa. That's why I predict Trump gets 27% even as polls show him in the mid 30s.

Yep, mid 30s seems to be unrealistic, but 31% are absolutely possible.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.239 seconds with 13 queries.