NBC/SurveyMonkey national: Trump 35% Cruz 18% Rubio 13% Carson 9% Bush 6%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 10:25:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  NBC/SurveyMonkey national: Trump 35% Cruz 18% Rubio 13% Carson 9% Bush 6%
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NBC/SurveyMonkey national: Trump 35% Cruz 18% Rubio 13% Carson 9% Bush 6%  (Read 2801 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 05, 2016, 09:15:41 AM »

NBC/SurveyMonkey national poll, conducted Dec. 28 - Jan. 3:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/294643292/NBC-News-SurveyMonkey-Weekly-Election-Tracking-Poll

Trump 35%
Cruz 18%
Rubio 13%
Carson 9%
Bush 6%
Christie 4%
Fiorina 3%
Huckabee 2%
Kasich 2%
Paul 2%
Santorum 1%
Gilmore 0%
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2016, 09:36:55 AM »

Updated trendline of all national polls:


Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,587
Venezuela


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2016, 09:45:13 AM »

So, nothing has changed, then. Gotcha.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2016, 09:47:02 AM »

Santorum goes from zero percent to one percent. This isn't my strongest field of math.  Is that an infinity increase in support?
Logged
Zanas
Zanas46
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,947
France


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2016, 10:08:39 AM »

Santorum goes from zero percent to one percent. This isn't my strongest field of math.  Is that an infinity increase in support?
Yes, that is indeed an ∞% increase. Keeping this trend, Rick Santorum will win the General election and all Senate seats on Thursday.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 05, 2016, 10:11:33 AM »

Santorum goes from zero percent to one percent. This isn't my strongest field of math.  Is that an infinity increase in support?
Yes, that is indeed an ∞% increase. Keeping this trend, Rick Santorum will win the General election and all Senate seats on Thursday.

Thanks!
Logged
emailking
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,879
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2016, 10:38:36 AM »

Undefined technically. Or more precisely, the question is ill formed as you can't have a percentage (or fractional) increase when there is nothing to take a percentage of.

But I know we're being tongue-in-cheek, so yeah...infinity-% I guess.

Also, I like this:

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 05, 2016, 12:59:22 PM »

What is with these inconsiderate jerks polling during New Years?
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 05, 2016, 02:07:40 PM »

Haha, SurveyMonkey is less of a joke than the WSJ evidently.
Logged
bigedlb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 280
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2016, 02:42:15 PM »

We can go ape about survey monkey, but NBC prefers their partnership with WSJ because Trump's numbers are lower ...  Trump is suing NBC...
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 05, 2016, 06:56:21 PM »

Some crosstabs:






Logged
Sorenroy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,703
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -5.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 05, 2016, 08:47:53 PM »


Is this in a general election amongst republicans or in the republican primary?
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 05, 2016, 08:51:59 PM »


Is this in a general election amongst republicans or in the republican primary?

Republican primary
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 06, 2016, 08:18:37 AM »

Here's who everyone picks as their 2nd choice:










Logged
muon2
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,821


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 06, 2016, 09:07:27 AM »

Undefined technically. Or more precisely, the question is ill formed as you can't have a percentage (or fractional) increase when there is nothing to take a percentage of.

But I know we're being tongue-in-cheek, so yeah...infinity-% I guess.

Also, I like this:

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.


I concur. As long as the MoE has decimals, too, then we should be able to use decimals on the main numbers. The meaning of both is well defined. For values under 10%, not using decimals seems strange.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 06, 2016, 02:48:59 PM »

That second choice graphic is one of the most depressing things I have seen. Yes, the Pub party has gone truly nutter. Just awful. Now the only question, is whether it is just a temporary psychosis that meds can handle, or long term and chronic.

This really might be a realigning election, as a group of Pubs leave (let's call them for the moment the WSJ Republicans), and wander around in the wilderness (it is really, not that bad being a Dem in NY actually), and maybe with the Pubs having a more populist and perhaps protectionist profile, it attracts even more blue collar white voters. I don't know where the Pubs will get their money from, with this profile, but that is another matter.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 06, 2016, 03:04:43 PM »

While it is often said that Rubio is everyone's second choice, it seems that is more true for Cruz. He is the net beneficiary from a Trump collapse, more Carson collapse and even the the collapse of the so-called 'mainstream' candidates.

The Trump chart alone may explain why the establishment hasn't gone after Trump in the same way they went after Gingrich four years ago. While Santorum benefited from the Gingrich collapse, the GOP elites and Romney knew that they could deal with him, especially as he had no money.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 06, 2016, 03:10:45 PM »

While it is often said that Rubio is everyone's second choice, it seems that is more true for Cruz. He is the net beneficiary from a Trump collapse, more Carson collapse and even the the collapse of the so-called 'mainstream' candidates.

The Trump chart alone may explain why the establishment hasn't gone after Trump in the same way they went after Gingrich four years ago. While Santorum benefited from the Gingrich collapse, the GOP elites and Romney knew that they could deal with him, especially as he had no money.

I think you may be right, assuming the establishment would prefer Cruz over Trump. It's kind of dicey, since just about every Pub politician hates Cruz (he's loathed in the Senate), but maybe he is less risky, and there is the comfort that he will lose to Hillary, but perhaps by not the kind of margin that will take a lot of other Pubs down with him. On a personal level, I think Trump is more likable than Cruz, who is not likable at all, but maybe Cruz would tone down in a General election.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 06, 2016, 03:16:04 PM »

While it is often said that Rubio is everyone's second choice, it seems that is more true for Cruz. He is the net beneficiary from a Trump collapse, more Carson collapse and even the the collapse of the so-called 'mainstream' candidates.

The Trump chart alone may explain why the establishment hasn't gone after Trump in the same way they went after Gingrich four years ago. While Santorum benefited from the Gingrich collapse, the GOP elites and Romney knew that they could deal with him, especially as he had no money.
Cruz in many ways seems to be at the center of the party right now.  He's conservative, but isn't nearly as inflammatory as Trump.  He's anti-establishment, but he actually holds office and has government experience.  Not to mention, he's been trying to appeal to Libertarians and Evangelicals.
Logged
Statilius the Epicurean
Thersites
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,615
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: January 08, 2016, 11:56:17 AM »

So if the establishment don't want to take out Trump because Cruz would benefit, what is their strategy? Brokered convention? Because there will be one if he stays in until the end.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,097
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: January 08, 2016, 12:06:57 PM »

So if the establishment don't want to take out Trump because Cruz would benefit, what is their strategy?

Praying for his death.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.236 seconds with 13 queries.