Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules

[heatmaster]

Really?  Then she's gotta be hiding something. The burden of proof, resides with her. It ain't gonna go away and that's the way it's gonna stay. So if you are complaining or bothered by Fox News, that tells me one thing, they are doing something right,  so keep it up Fox News,  "You know they are fair and balanced, and unafraid"☺

[IceSpear]

According to Politico (big caveat), Hillary's press conference can be summarized by her telling the press to go to hell:

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/03/hillary-clinton-press-conference-115958.html#.VQDgPeFwsSk

Personally, I didn't really get that vibe when I watched it. But if that really was the case, I like her even more now (yes, apparently that's possible).

[Badger]

Lol, this is ABSOLUTELY nothing compared to what will be dug up when the Dems anounce Hillary is the candidate...THE CLINTONS HAVE WAYYYY WORS BAGAGE THAN THIS HAHA.

MAYBE SOMEONE CAN ASK HER ABOUT THIS AFTER HER NEXT SPEECH FOR $250k LOL

Hey look! It's "that guy".
I know it's wrong to pick on special needs people so I leave it there.

Take the Hilary blinders off buddy, shes Ms. Moneybags, the female version of Mitt Romney.

Other than her economic views being near opposite of Romney's that's a great analogy.

[heatmaster]

Getting back to Lewinsky era, what the definition of "is" is, why am I not surprised? Clinton's are parsing there words, because Hillary is caught in a double negative, if she signed a document stating under oath she had returned all relevant GOVERNMENT documents,  and she didn't, then she's committing perjury, her husband did that didn't he? & if she didn't sign the affidavit, had she has unauthorized classified documents, then she's committing a felony, again her husband committed a felony, the Feds nailed Petraeus on the latter when they raided his home. The government also decides what is relevant and not Hillary. Wonder how the Clinton's are gonna parse there way out of this, very difficult and so wonderful for her to be in such a fix, there must be a god in his heaven after all☺

[The Other Castro]

Following your train of thought is like watching Ben Carson pilot an Amtrak without wheels over ice.

[Lincoln Republican]

But Hillary has an entitlement to do this.

Just look at hers and Bills history of entitlement.

It's their right.

After all, they are Clintons you know.

I strongly advise lesser mortals not to interfere with the Clintons or to cross them.

You'll be sorry.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

There's a lot things I dislike about Hillary and her history, but this is just a silly non-issue.

[heatmaster]

Like the Whitewater land deal was a silly issue, or the Lewinsky B.J. Scandal issue was a silly non issue, or LBJ's wire-taps were silly non issue or the IRS taking liberties was a silly non issue, but George W. Bush going to war in Iraq was a very serious issue...wait a minute, what am I talking about?  Of course being Democrats makes it an entitlement to do such things...stands to reason, considering that Democrats are the party of entitlement. Ever hear of double standards? Well unfortunately for Hillary and you Democrats,  not many Republicans buy into the silly non - issue bull-crap narrative and neither does the government, nor does the Obama White House,  if they can take Hillary out, they will and this "silly non-issue" might turn out to be anything but a "silly non-issue". Which means Hillary might be a "silly non-issue" by the time those who despise everything she stands for are done with her and spit her out. If it happens any one who takes issue with what happens,  can always say, "it's a silly non issue"😉

[Beet]

Like the Whitewater land deal was a silly issue, or the Lewinsky B.J. Scandal issue was a silly non issue, or LBJ's wire-taps were silly non issue or the IRS taking liberties was a silly non issue, but George W. Bush going to war in Iraq was a very serious issue...wait a minute, what am I talking about?  Of course being Democrats makes it an entitlement to do such things...stands to reason, considering that Democrats are the party of entitlement. Ever hear of double standards? Well unfortunately for Hillary and you Democrats,  not many Republicans buy into the silly non - issue bull-crap narrative and neither those the government, nor does the Obama White House,  if they can take Hillary out, they will and this "silly non-issue" might turn out to be a "silly non-issue". Which means Hillary might be a "silly non-issue" by the time those who despise everything she stands for are done with her and spit her out. If it happens any one who takes issue with what happens,  can always say, "it's a silly non issue"😉

A war in which 1 million people died is equivalent to a B.J.? We need to get Ken Starr on this immediately.

[heatmaster]

So what? If you want a comparison why not talk about LBJ's Vietnam saga?  Suppose that was okay, being that he was a Democrat and Iraq was not okay because Dubya is a Republican, interesting double standard you have, if all you can focus on are Republican 'misdeeds' & ignore all the Clinton's misdeeds, but then again it's all about entitlement with most Democrats...again it's logical, since you are the party of entitlements😉

[The Other Castro]

I'm no military strategist, but I'm pretty sure BJs kill significantly fewer people than wars.

[heatmaster]

Bill Clinton set the standard on how to weather "silly non-issue" scandals, parsing his words by definitions of what the word "is" is.He's got a good pupil in Hillary.  By the by, most Democrats including Hillary voted for war with Iraq, so there's blood on her hands as well, a minor inconvenience she'd rather sooner forget.  But I'd prefer not forget that it was equally convenient to vote in favor 12 years ago, after all she had presidential ambitions to consider when casting the vote. Probably wants to weasle out of her role in Benghazi as well and those emails could prove to be her undoing. She's desperate to move beyond it, but the media, Trey Goudy & other Republicans happily won't allow her and are not likely to drop it. But hey! It's a killer campaign issue. So why not keep hammering away at her on the issue,  see no incentive to stop.

[t_host1]

 
 It seems to me with Hillary stating that there are no classified or state department emails on her private server, having not used any .gov servers and having signed the exit doc. fo109 like everyone else, does explain her list of accomplishments, nothing there.

[King]

The problem is that this scandal is already dead. Generally you want your scandals to be ongoing.  She's being out of SoS for 2 years and had already given the state department the requested emails. Everything being posted is just opinions of what happened and not actual news stories of something new happening. She's not going to have to fire anybody or change her daily business as is.

It's March 2015. 20 months prior to the general election. In March 2011, 20 months prior to that general election, the Obama Administration was caught currently selling weapons to Mexican drug cartels.  A scandal where actions had to be taken tapered off and died. I can't see a scandal where nothing actually has to happen lasting 20 more months in the public conscious.