Balanced Budget Amendment
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 11:55:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Balanced Budget Amendment
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How do you feel about a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution?
#1
Support (D)
 
#2
Support (R)
 
#3
Support (I/O)
 
#4
Oppose (D)
 
#5
Oppose (R)
 
#6
Oppose (I/O)
 
#7
Not Sure (D)
 
#8
Not Sure (R)
 
#9
Not Sure (I/O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 61

Author Topic: Balanced Budget Amendment  (Read 1423 times)
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 05, 2014, 09:20:16 AM »

3 days.

I oppose it, because I don't think it's really necessary.  It's always important the governments balance their budgets, and many states that already have balanced budget amendments don't have balanced budgets in practice.
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2014, 10:09:58 AM »

not while norquistians are a thing.
Logged
bedstuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,526


Political Matrix
E: -1.16, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2014, 10:13:05 AM »

It's an incredibly dangerous idea.  Just imagine the 2008-9 crisis with a balanced budget amendment.  That would have been way worse than the Great Depression.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2014, 10:38:45 AM »

Oppose
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2014, 10:42:05 AM »

It's an incredibly dangerous idea.  Just imagine the 2008-9 crisis with a balanced budget amendment.  That would have been way worse than the Great Depression.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2014, 11:17:16 AM »

One of the most unfathomably, mind-numbingly stupid ideas that have ever been seriously considered.
Logged
Oakvale
oakvale
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,827
Ukraine
Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2014, 12:42:45 PM »

There's a compromise that would allow governments to run deficits during recession but force a surplus when the economy's doing alright, so you end up with a balanced budget over business cycles instead of the idiotic yearly requirement, like in Sweden. That would be worth looking at. I'm not a fan of the standard Republican proposals - fiscal prudence is a good thing, but there's nothing prudent about sacrificing economic recovery on the altar of dogma.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,520
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2014, 12:44:24 PM »

Oppose obviously.

How to be sure a country won't be able to recover from a crisis.
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,364
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 05, 2014, 01:21:42 PM »

One of the dumbest ideas I've ever heard
Logged
RedSLC
SLValleyMan
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,484
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 05, 2014, 02:10:54 PM »

Oppose. As others have stated, sometimes the government needs to reun deficits to prevent economic collapse.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 05, 2014, 02:14:51 PM »

Oakvale made a good point, and that type of Balanced Budget Amendment I would support.
Logged
AggregateDemand
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,873
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: June 05, 2014, 02:27:03 PM »

We have balanced budget amendments in Texas. They are symbolic and pointless.

Debt is not inherently bad. Debt becomes a problem when people use it to finance frivolous spending and inefficient budgeting. You'll never get an amendment through to stop bureaucratic malfeasance.
Logged
H. Ross Peron
General Mung Beans
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,401
Korea, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -1.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: June 05, 2014, 02:33:43 PM »

It's an incredibly dangerous idea.  Just imagine the 2008-9 crisis with a balanced budget amendment.  That would have been way worse than the Great Depression.
Logged
Deus Naturae
Deus naturae
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,637
Croatia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: June 05, 2014, 02:43:06 PM »

It's an incredibly dangerous idea.  Just imagine the 2008-9 crisis with a balanced budget amendment.  That would have been way worse than the Great Depression.
Yeah, who knows what might've happened! Unemployment might've even gone over 8%.......oh wait.
Logged
bedstuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,526


Political Matrix
E: -1.16, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: June 05, 2014, 03:21:48 PM »

It's an incredibly dangerous idea.  Just imagine the 2008-9 crisis with a balanced budget amendment.  That would have been way worse than the Great Depression.
Yeah, who knows what might've happened! Unemployment might've even gone over 8%.......oh wait.

Without TARP and the stimulus, all the investment banks go and all the commercial banks follow.  All the credit markets freeze and you don't have any ability to do basic corporate finance.  I've talked to a bunch of people who are informed about this, they throw out numbers like 25% unemployment without the bailouts and stimulus. 
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 05, 2014, 03:25:47 PM »
« Edited: June 05, 2014, 03:29:20 PM by ElectionsGuy »

Strongly support

But I don't think that cutting everything in a short period of time is a smart idea.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,980
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 05, 2014, 03:27:35 PM »

Strongly oppose (R).

Modern-day countries with developed economies cannot function properly without a healthy amount of sovereign debt. 
Logged
rosin
Rookie
**
Posts: 237
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 05, 2014, 04:11:23 PM »

It's an incredibly dangerous idea.  Just imagine the 2008-9 crisis with a balanced budget amendment.  That would have been way worse than the Great Depression.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,071
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: June 05, 2014, 09:39:30 PM »

While I do think the government spends too much, IMO a balanced budget is too impractical of an idea.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: June 06, 2014, 03:52:03 AM »

There's a compromise that would allow governments to run deficits during recession but force a surplus when the economy's doing alright, so you end up with a balanced budget over business cycles instead of the idiotic yearly requirement, like in Sweden.

I can support that if it also forces deficit spending during recessions. No reason why it shouldn't go both ways.
Logged
Supersonic
SupersonicVenue
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,162
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.90, S: 0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: June 06, 2014, 11:57:00 AM »

Oppose, I don't mind them at the state level, Federally, no.
Logged
PiMp DaDdy FitzGerald
Mr. Pollo
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 788


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: June 06, 2014, 12:48:05 PM »

Strongly oppose (R).

Modern-day countries with developed economies cannot function properly without a healthy amount of sovereign debt. 
Logged
politicallefty
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,288
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -9.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: June 07, 2014, 08:06:06 AM »

Strongly oppose. Restricting the government in such a manner would severely cripple this country during even a normal recession.
Logged
Mordecai
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,465
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: June 08, 2014, 02:36:11 AM »

One of the dumbest ideas I've ever heard
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.241 seconds with 14 queries.