Thoughts on the Pearcy 38 States Map?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 17, 2024, 11:05:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Thoughts on the Pearcy 38 States Map?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Thoughts on the Pearcy 38 States Map?  (Read 2150 times)
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,872
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: May 06, 2014, 10:47:20 PM »

Allegheny and Mohawk will determine which way this electoral college would lean.  Right now there are fewer CDs of D+ territory but also fewer small states so the senator EVs are less important.  Not sure which effect will win.
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,090
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: May 07, 2014, 01:32:04 AM »
« Edited: May 07, 2014, 01:37:02 AM by Sen. Griffin (LAB-NB) »

And done (except for AK, but screw that)!

Looks like the Senate as a whole would be quite even, albeit with a slight D bias. I could see Dems getting 41-42 out of 76 with two or three good cycles in a row; maybe 35 in a bad era.

Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,056
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: May 07, 2014, 06:59:21 AM »

Please do Alaska.
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,826


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: May 12, 2014, 10:17:48 PM »

And done (except for AK, but screw that)!

Looks like the Senate as a whole would be quite even, albeit with a slight D bias. I could see Dems getting 41-42 out of 76 with two or three good cycles in a row; maybe 35 in a bad era.



I'm not sure it has much of a D bias. Instead of looking at 2008 vote share one should look at the PVI. That means subtracting 52.9% from the D vote share. That shifts 3 of those states from D to R and 2 would be even. So if both in AK are R, then I count 15 D, 21 R, 2 E.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,865
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: May 12, 2014, 11:10:40 PM »

Very interesting. Dearborn would be a pretty awesome state both politically and geographically. Definitely much more unity than what we have now.
Logged
Nutmeg
thepolitic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,930
United States Minor Outlying Islands


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: May 29, 2014, 10:21:48 PM »

Some fairly odd choices of names there such as a State of Eire that does not touch Lake Eire.  And why he felt the need to rename Hawaii when his proposed Kilauea covers the exact same territory is beyond me.

Or misspell Talladega.
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: May 29, 2014, 11:27:39 PM »

Gonna start 2012 (with whole counties)



Just Cascade so far
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,580
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: May 30, 2014, 03:55:26 PM »

Very interesting. Dearborn would be a pretty awesome state both politically and geographically. Definitely much more unity than what we have now.

I agree, I would love Madison to be in a state like that. However, I don't think Grand Rapids area would.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.226 seconds with 11 queries.