why is nader running?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 09:17:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  why is nader running?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: why is nader running?  (Read 1148 times)
nomorelies
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 739


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 08, 2004, 03:50:14 PM »

here is a man who hates bush, yet he was the reason that bush was elected president in 2000. he says he has to run because he is different from the democrats, and its good for democracy in the us if he runs. some voters will not vote nader like last time, but bearing in mind some states were won by only a few thousands, it could happen again. if he hates bush as he says he does, then pull out and back kerry. I now that if he pulled out tomorrow bush wouldnt be a happy bunny. so whats his motive?
Logged
Nation
of_thisnation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,555
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2004, 03:54:34 PM »

If I see another thread like this, I swear. . .



1) Gore cost HIMSELF the election with his horrid campaign.

2) Nader's still giving Americans a CHOICE other than the two main parties. The country (mainly congress) has become so polarized, it's extremely difficult to get anything done.

3) I don't know about you, but I don't want to live in a country where people are not encouraged to do what they believe is right.

4) Go call the Wahhhhmbulance, I think they've got some space for you.
Logged
nomorelies
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 739


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2004, 04:04:13 PM »

in the uk, you can vote for  the monster raving loony party, the green party, the british national party. This has made the uk a joke,  as it increased the chances of conservative rule coz they are so loyal. while its easir to identify with people who have liberal ideals. Hence you end up with huge majorities in parliament that dont listen to the people, just themselves. even in elections its difficult to get rid of them, in less a huge revolt occurs. thats why the uk had maggie"the milk snatcher" and Tony "im smarter than you" Blair  since 1979.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2004, 04:04:39 PM »

If I see another thread like this, I swear. . .



1) Gore cost HIMSELF the election with his horrid campaign.

2) Nader's still giving Americans a CHOICE other than the two main parties. The country (mainly congress) has become so polarized, it's extremely difficult to get anything done.

3) I don't know about you, but I don't want to live in a country where people are not encouraged to do what they believe is right.

4) Go call the Wahhhhmbulance, I think they've got some space for you.

thank you.
Logged
JohnFKennedy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,448


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2004, 04:09:05 PM »

in the uk, you can vote for  the monster raving loony party, the green party, the british national party. This has made the uk a joke,  as it increased the chances of conservative rule coz they are so loyal. while its easir to identify with people who have liberal ideals. Hence you end up with huge majorities in parliament that dont listen to the people, just themselves. even in elections its difficult to get rid of them, in less a huge revolt occurs. thats why the uk had maggie"the milk snatcher" and Tony "im smarter than you" Blair  since 1979.

Monster Raving Loony Party ARE a joke, that is the point.
Green Party and BNP are serious parties, just extreme views.

They don't detract from other parties and they don't increase the chance of conservative rule really, last time I checked, LABOUR were in power in the UK.
Logged
nomorelies
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 739


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2004, 04:12:51 PM »

because of a huge revolt, thats why tony blair why. britain had enough of 18 years of conservatives. you plank. read!!
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,917
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2004, 04:20:17 PM »

because of a huge revolt, thats why tony blair why. britain had enough of 18 years of conservatives. you plank. read!!

Eh... the swing towards Thatcher was small in 1979.
Please learn how to type properly...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.223 seconds with 13 queries.