Point taken. But you're also missing my point that if this is optional, it would be the exact opposite. It would cause LITERAL INEQUALITY. I'm all for fixing genetic disorders with this. Being healthy as possible is important, but if they are not disabled, why do they need to be "better looking." Can't you just accept people the way they are? Wouldn't it be better for society if we accept diversity rather than remove it from our society?
But why shouldn't we be better looking? Why should we "accept the way we are"? It's not as simple as just "accepting diversity". The fact of the matter that people
do get judged on their looks (studies verify this) and no amount of education will change this. It's evolutionary.
Also the idea is (for me at least) that this kind of advance would be universally available to all. Another reason why real universal health care is of the utmost importance.