2016 Candidates According to the Political Compass
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 08:35:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  2016 Candidates According to the Political Compass
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2016 Candidates According to the Political Compass  (Read 6672 times)
Marnetmar
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 495
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.58, S: -8.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 17, 2013, 04:51:34 PM »

I'm sure we are all quite aware of PC's "The entire world has been corrupted by neoliberalism and everyone is far far right" idea, so where do you think the potential 2016 candidates could land on there? Here's my idea for a few...



This is, of course, assuming they go back to their 2008 attitude and don't become nuttier, in which all candidates will most likely be surrounding the top right corner in roughly a 3-dot-by-3-dot area...

Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2013, 07:58:59 PM »

Gillibrand is probably up a few, Clinton up half or one, Paul down a few.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,868
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2013, 02:28:05 PM »

1. We are all becoming much less lenient toward crime. Just think of gun control -- President Obama has made mostly right-wing arguments against assault rifles, massacre clips, and unsavory people facing lax background checks. We are getting much less sympathetic toward sex offenders and domestic violence.

I took the test and I found myself where I am -- but that was because many of the questions asked about my attitudes between science and superstition and on due process of the law. The test did not ask me about meth labs, child sexual abuse, or domestic violence. If the question had been asked, "Is crime strictly the result of economic distress or of personal moral failure?" I would have given an authoritarian answer.

The conservative answer is of course "moral failure". Economic distress may push people who would otherwise avoid crime into crime, but one must recognize that a comparative few people commit the bulk of crime. Such is reality. Most people in the ghettos do no crime.


2. We have found that some parts of humanity utterly hate America and it is not because of our economic system. We can easily get authoritarian attitudes toward terrorism -- right?
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,696
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2013, 02:30:49 PM »

LOL -is this from the European perspective?
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,282
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2013, 09:50:16 AM »

LOL -is this from the European perspective?

This is the Political Compass' assessment of current governments in the EU:

Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,868
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2013, 09:54:17 AM »

LOL -is this from the European perspective?

Probably. Christian fundamentalism (whether Protestant or Catholic) is far stronger in America than in Europe. Socialism is about as much a political epithet as fascism in America. The extensive welfare state that has something for everyone is more strongly developed almost everywhere in Europe than in America. America remains a cultural suburb of Europe, but it has been exempt from the political traumas that destroyed the last traces if feudal organization and attitudes.



This is the Political Compass' assessment of current governments in the EU:



Whoops! Maybe that is all too simplistic an answer on my part.
Logged
Marnetmar
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 495
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.58, S: -8.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2013, 01:52:50 PM »

Also:

According to the Political Compass, Hu Jintao also is to the right of Ron Paul, Francois Hollande is a centrist, Sweden is a neoliberal libertarian's paradise, Rocky Anderson is a moderate libertarian and the conservative party was once to the left of John Kerry.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,643
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2013, 05:24:03 PM »

Yeah the Political Compasses charts are on crack, quite frankly. I'm certain that if we took the tests as politicans there'd be a far healthier spread.
Logged
Sopranos Republican
Matt from VT
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,181
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.03, S: -8.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2013, 08:39:30 PM »

According to this Michael Moore should be in the middle.
Logged
Marnetmar
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 495
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.58, S: -8.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2013, 10:10:54 AM »

According to this Michael Moore should be in the middle.

Moore would probably be at about 2 economic and 1 social.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.227 seconds with 13 queries.