If Israel attacks Iran, plus Obama or plus Romney?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 08:48:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  If Israel attacks Iran, plus Obama or plus Romney?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: If Israel attacks Iran, plus Obama or plus Romney?  (Read 1225 times)
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,662
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: September 05, 2012, 05:59:41 AM »

Probably leans Obama, but I'm skeptical if it has that much of an impact. It could hurt him if things turn ugly.

Anyway, Israel aren't stupid. It isn't happening.
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,413
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: September 05, 2012, 01:54:51 PM »

Plus Obama, if he wins i.e. defeats Iran without huge economic damage. The war would probably be short and not particularly an Army war.
Logged
mondale84
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.30

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: September 05, 2012, 01:58:48 PM »

Plus Obama, if he wins i.e. defeats Iran without huge economic damage. The war would probably be short and not particularly an Army war.

That's what they told us about Iraq... Roll Eyes
Logged
Cory
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,708


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: September 05, 2012, 11:22:33 PM »

That's what they told us about Iraq... Roll Eyes

A conflict with Iran would not in all likelihood involve a land invasion of Iran itself.
Logged
patrick1
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,865


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: September 05, 2012, 11:30:41 PM »

Plus Obama, if he wins i.e. defeats Iran without huge economic damage. The war would probably be short and not particularly an Army war.

That's what they told us about Iraq... Roll Eyes

The Iraq war was always going to involve a ground component to oust Hussein, however, the ad hoc Bush team 'plan' for transition was an absolute catastrophe. So much blood and treasure was wasted because they were in such a rush.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.212 seconds with 11 queries.