Inflation and Unit Labor Cost
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 02:18:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  Inflation and Unit Labor Cost
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Inflation and Unit Labor Cost  (Read 1070 times)
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 23, 2012, 12:22:35 AM »

Link: http://www.princeton.edu/~mwatson/papers/King_Watson_GERZ25_Jan26_2012.pdf

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,997


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2012, 12:35:59 PM »

What happened around 1980?
Logged
t_host1
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 820


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2012, 08:26:57 PM »

Jimmy Carter, gas rationing, CD's at 10%, mortgages at 19%, misery index...
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,209
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2012, 09:37:07 PM »

Decline in manufacturing, perhaps?
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 05, 2012, 09:17:21 AM »

Clearly we have had a deflationary economy since neoliberalism was instituted by Reagan.  The only possible end result is a capitalist collapse and intractable depression.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 05, 2012, 02:53:27 PM »


There was some monopoly breakup, and deregulation got popular.  Channeling Ron Paul I could also say that stabilization policy by the Fed (monetary manipulation in order to decrease market volatility) was the main creator of the divergence between the red and blue lines. 
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: August 05, 2012, 03:04:21 PM »

So, angus, you don't suppose China had anything to do with it?
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: August 05, 2012, 03:57:37 PM »

So, angus, you don't suppose China had anything to do with it?

Channeling Mitt Romney?

Sure, China too.  Why not?  I suspect it has multiple causes, including those given in the footnotes on pages 10 and 11 as well as section five of the linked file which cite peculiarities of the GG and SW models used in determining the parameters, but I prefer to cite a combination of Reaganomics and the Great Moderation.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: August 05, 2012, 04:03:19 PM »

So, angus, you don't suppose China had anything to do with it?

Channeling Mitt Romney?

Sure, China too.  Why not?  I suspect it has multiple causes, including those given in the footnotes on pages 10 and 11 as well as section five of the linked file which cite peculiarities of the GG and SW models used in determining the parameters, but I prefer to cite a combination of Reaganomics and the Great Moderation.

I'm not blaming China, angus, I'm blaming capitalism.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: August 05, 2012, 05:00:23 PM »
« Edited: August 05, 2012, 06:03:24 PM by phk »


Manufacturing output has never declined. Lower-level manufacturing jobs have been automated though.

Not quite as early but from 1987 we can see the trends of manufacturing employment and manufacturing output:



Output per worker. As we note it doubled it's 1987 number some time in early 2005. Pretty much the same amount of time a child born in 1987 took to graduate high school.

Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: August 06, 2012, 06:09:10 AM »



Output per worker. As we note it doubled it's 1987 number some time in early 2005. Pretty much the same amount of time a child born in 1987 took to graduate high school.

Interesting that nearly all that increase took place in the 1990s.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: August 06, 2012, 10:00:23 PM »



Output per worker. As we note it doubled it's 1987 number some time in early 2005. Pretty much the same amount of time a child born in 1987 took to graduate high school.

Interesting that nearly all that increase took place in the 1990s.

and the number of people employed stayed pretty much the same until the 2001 recession.
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: August 06, 2012, 11:56:52 PM »



Output per worker. As we note it doubled it's 1987 number some time in early 2005. Pretty much the same amount of time a child born in 1987 took to graduate high school.

Interesting that nearly all that increase took place in the 1990s.

and the number of people employed stayed pretty much the same until the 2001 recession.

So about the time computers started becoming cheap?
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: August 08, 2012, 05:45:33 AM »

So about the time computers started becoming cheap?

No, buddy, about the time globalization accelerated, particularly the movement of production to China.  Computers are not a big factor, and the small difference in price between a 1997 computer and a 2007 one is definitely not a bit factor.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.22 seconds with 12 queries.