It is clear the GOP is still looking for a candidate
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 04, 2024, 01:41:06 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  It is clear the GOP is still looking for a candidate
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: It is clear the GOP is still looking for a candidate  (Read 2376 times)
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: September 23, 2011, 10:17:35 PM »

I think we saw in two months what took three years to play out with Obama. A candidate comes along who is overhyped and a bandwagon affect occurs amongst people desperate for someone, anyone other then what they have now. Then as they see what they are actually getting, the magic vanishes and is replaced with panic and despair.

They real question is who gets a 'second' chance?

the rest are all too extreme (Paul) or tainted (Newt) or both (Santorum).

What the GOP grassroots wanted was a Ryan/Rubio kind of ticket....but Ryan has said no.

...I still think my economic and environmental views (willing to spend on our energy infrastructure in order to keep a good portion of $700B we're sending overseas each year for oil, willing to protect the oceans so that fish stocks can rebound, cutting ties to Japan unless they stop whaling, etc, etc) would be a good sell to the GOP and to the nation during the general election....the problem is these pols, on both sides of the isle, have ZERO imagination to rebuild this country and they stand for very little.

There is a problem with Ryan that would manifest itself if he rose beyond Budget Chair. It's the dirty word that begins with the letter I, that just screwed Perry six ways to Sunday. Christie also has the same problem, by the way. It is not surprising considering that Ryan is a protege of Jack Kemp, that he would also share Kemp's views on this.

That is one thing about Romney that set's him apart from most of the semi-Moderate/Economic Conservatives. He hasn't sold himself to the WSJ and the COC on immigration. Even though Romney supports legal immigration and supported increased levels of such in 2007 (this time Romney has linked it to direct economic need rather than blanket increases), the deal breaker for these irreconcilable corporate suits is the opposition to Amnesty, the support for an employment verification system, and amongst some even just the call for more border security. All three hurt the bottom line. This is why the establishment isn't completely behind Romney and there is just as much desperation for more candidates amongst them as there is amongst conservatives.

There isn't a WSJ/COC candidate in this race at this time, save possibly for Huntsman. Perry was actually being considered for this spot and it's vast amounts of money. But that was yesterday and this is today.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: September 23, 2011, 11:35:05 PM »

If I could get assurances from Romney that would attempt to continue to drain the swamp, cut entitlements, and appoint more Scalia's to the SCOTUS...then I would be on board with a Romney nomination.

What happened to the jmfcst who wrote this just a couple of weeks ago?

there is no way the jmfcst's of the gop are going to vote for romney

dude, [Romney] is done, stick a tea bag in him

Romny has no path to the nomination...short him


How many times has Romney been immediately eclipsed by a random wacko in the last two months? 

Romney is the type who could win every single delegate during the primaries and still lose the nomination to a random republican at the convention
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,066
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: September 23, 2011, 11:55:28 PM »

If I could get assurances from Romney that would attempt to continue to drain the swamp, cut entitlements, and appoint more Scalia's to the SCOTUS...then I would be on board with a Romney nomination.

What happened to the jmfcst who wrote this just a couple of weeks ago?

there is no way the jmfcst's of the gop are going to vote for romney

dude, [Romney] is done, stick a tea bag in him

Romny has no path to the nomination...short him


How many times has Romney been immediately eclipsed by a random wacko in the last two months? 

Romney is the type who could win every single delegate during the primaries and still lose the nomination to a random republican at the convention

OK.  That doesn't seem to address the fact that your most recent posts have you going wobbly on both whether Romney can win the nomination and whether you would support him for the nomination, in contrast to your earlier posts, where you said that that would never happen.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: September 23, 2011, 11:57:14 PM »

OK.  That doesn't seem to address the fact that your most recent posts have you going wobbly on both whether Romney can win the nomination and whether you would support him for the nomination, in contrast to your earlier posts, where you said that that would never happen.


it would never happen unless he could reassure social conservatives
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.212 seconds with 11 queries.