Obama would rather cut Social Security and Medicare than wars and empire.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 03:09:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Obama would rather cut Social Security and Medicare than wars and empire.
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Obama would rather cut Social Security and Medicare than wars and empire.  (Read 366 times)
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 07, 2011, 01:03:22 PM »

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Obama-would-rather-cut-Soc-by-Andrew-Steele-110707-790.html

Obama's a socialist? Nope-- just another run-of-the-mill corporatist. Nothing better exemplifies this than the latest news coming out about the the debt talks between the President and the congressional leaders of the fake right.

From the Washington Post:

President Obama is pressing congressional leaders to consider a far-reaching debt-reduction plan that would force Democrats to accept major changes to Social Security and Medicare in exchange for Republican support for fresh tax revenue...As part of his pitch, Obama is proposing significant reductions in Medicare spending and for the first time is offering to tackle the rising cost of Social Security, according to people in both parties with knowledge of the proposal.

Regardless of one's beliefs about the constitutionality of these programs, both sides of the debate should be quick to notice the priorities of the President, and his so called opposition, turning to programs so many Americans have already paid into and are depending on instead of first looking overseas at the world empire that is bankrupting us all.

According to a report released last month by Brown University, the The United States will have spent a total of $3.7 trillion on the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan by the time that they're over (the word "over" being loosely defined in 21st Century Amerika ). This isn't counting the war in Libya (oh, I forgot that's not a war, according to Obama) or the bases the United States maintains in nations like Germany where hostilities ended so long ago that most of the people who participated in them have either died or are living on Social Security.

Even Libertarian minded presidential candidate Ron Paul-- who is often the subject of attacks by pundits trying to imply that Social Security and Medicare would abruptly end the minute he was sworn into office-- has advocated changing foreign policy and dramatically cutting defense spending before touching Social Security and Medicare, allowing people to get what they have already paid for and not be cheated any further by their corrupt government.
Logged
ilikeverin
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,409
Timor-Leste


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2011, 01:04:13 PM »

I'm so glad he's actually talking about the changes we need to make to entitlements!
Logged
Hotblack Desiato
Rookie
**
Posts: 124
Uruguay


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -0.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2011, 09:18:41 PM »

Cutting out the wars and empire means we can't do the mass consumer society anymore. If that happened, the elites wouldn't be able to bribe people anymore.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.228 seconds with 10 queries.