SC: Rasmussen: DeMint with a big lead against Greene

[Tender Branson]

New Poll: South Carolina Senator by Rasmussen on 2010-09-26

Summary: D: 21%, R: 64%, I: 10%, U: 5%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

[Meeker]

I'm proud to stand with that 21%.

[redcommander]

Damn it I want that teabagger out of office!

[Ogre Mage]

Run Alvin, Run!  

[feeblepizza]

Sadly, DeMint will probably end up with 70% of the vote. We all need to pray for Alvin!!!

[Lunar]

DeMint's lucky it's a tough year for Democrats, otherwise he'd be on thin ice

[minionofmidas]

I remain confident.

[Capitan Zapp Brannigan]

I'm going to move this race from Toss Up to Lean R.

Greene still has an excellent chance of winning though.

[Dgov]

DeMint's lucky it's a tough year for Democrats, otherwise he'd be on thin ice

He has 67% Favorability.  The Dems probably couldn't beat him in 2008, let alone a neutral year.

[tmthforu94]

Though it's kind of fun to root for Greene, anyone who would actually vote for him to be their next Senator really needs to get their priorities straightened out.

[Meeker]

DeMint's lucky it's a tough year for Democrats, otherwise he'd be on thin ice

He has 67% Favorability.  The Dems probably couldn't beat him in 2008, let alone a neutral year.

*whoosh*

[Franzl]

Though it's kind of fun to root for Greene, anyone who would actually vote for him to be their next Senator really needs to get their priorities straightened out.

I'd vote for Greene. Seriously. He's dumb and wouldn't get anything done.....but he isn't dangerous. DeMint is dangerous. The decision is clear for me.

[Dgov]

DeMint's lucky it's a tough year for Democrats, otherwise he'd be on thin ice

He has 67% Favorability.  The Dems probably couldn't beat him in 2008, let alone a neutral year.

*whoosh*

Oh, sorry, it sounded like something the hacks on this forum would honestly say.

[Fmr. Pres. Duke]

Though it's kind of fun to root for Greene, anyone who would actually vote for him to be their next Senator really needs to get their priorities straightened out.

I'd vote for Greene. Seriously. He's dumb and wouldn't get anything done.....but he isn't dangerous. DeMint is dangerous. The decision is clear for me.

My thoughts exactly.

[SPC]

How likely is it that Clements will get second?

[Eraserhead]

How likely is it that Clements will get second?

Not at all likely.

[minionofmidas]

How likely is it that Clements will get second?

About even with DeMint losing.

[??????????]

Wow, 21%. I wonder what his black support is.

[Whacker77]

Has anyone ever really figured out what happened in that primary.  Not to be crass, but was it just a case of African American voters supporting an African American candidate?  I might be open to dirty tricks possibility, but not in a race that was always going to be a DeMint blowout.

[Capitan Zapp Brannigan]

I just want to know how Greene got the money to put his name on the ballot when he's basically poor.

[SPQR]

Typical Rasmussen bias,I'm not gonna believe this trash poll.

[You kip if you want to...]

Typical Rasmussen bias,I'm not gonna believe this trash poll.

This is clearly a toss-up.

[SPC]

Typical Rasmussen bias,I'm not gonna believe this trash poll.

This is clearly a toss-up.

More like Leans Demcratic.

[minionofmidas]

Has anyone ever really figured out what happened in that primary.  Not to be crass, but was it just a case of African American voters supporting an African American candidate?  I might be open to dirty tricks possibility, but not in a race that was always going to be a DeMint blowout.

It was simply a case of people showing up for the primary for a different race entirely, and finding a contested senate primary with two people on the ballot that they'd literally never heard of. And thus making a random choice.
Rawl's name rec was higher than Greene's, understandably, but it was still ridiculously low.