Least Keynesian President (Since 1945)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 01:45:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Least Keynesian President (Since 1945)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Pretty much all modern presidents have been atributed/accused of being Keynesians, but who would you concider the least Keysian?
#1
Harry Truman
#2
Dwight Eisenhower
#3
John Kennedy
#4
Lyndon Johnson
#5
Richard Nixon
#6
Gerald Ford
#7
Jimmy Carter
#8
Ronald Reagan
#9
Bush 41
#10
Bill Clinton
#11
Bush 43
#12
Barack Obama
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Least Keynesian President (Since 1945)  (Read 3912 times)
Free Trade is managed by the invisible hand.
HoffmanJohn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,951
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: June 14, 2010, 08:27:00 AM »

In general presidents have become more Keynesian in a monetary sense, but I wouldn't be so sure when it comes to government spending.
Logged
Frink
Lafayette53
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 703
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.39, S: -6.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: June 14, 2010, 06:19:40 PM »

In general presidents have become more Keynesian in a monetary sense, but I wouldn't be so sure when it comes to government spending.

I don't think that any president has every really had a pure Keynesian Economic Policy, although admittedly FDR during WW2 (and the New Deal to a much lesser extent) came very close.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: June 14, 2010, 06:45:49 PM »

America has rejected him that economic theory. I knew right away when my professors advocated Keynesian economics that it was bad news.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: June 14, 2010, 07:11:44 PM »

America has rejected him that economic theory. I knew right away when my professors advocated Keynesian economics that it was bad news.

Despite being used by every country outside of the third world.
Logged
fezzyfestoon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,204
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: June 14, 2010, 07:12:50 PM »

America has rejected him that economic theory. I knew right away when my professors advocated Keynesian economics that it was bad news.

Uh...what?
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: June 14, 2010, 07:15:35 PM »

America has rejected him that economic theory. I knew right away when my professors advocated Keynesian economics that it was bad news.

Uh...what?

Derek did a lot of acid during the sixties 60 Minutes' piece on Keynesian economics.
Logged
Frink
Lafayette53
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 703
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.39, S: -6.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: June 15, 2010, 12:42:43 AM »

America has rejected him that economic theory. I knew right away when my professors advocated Keynesian economics that it was bad news.

I wish I could be as close-minded as you.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: June 15, 2010, 01:57:55 AM »

America has rejected him that economic theory. I knew right away when my professors advocated Keynesian economics that it was bad news.

I wish I could be as close-minded as you.

I'm open minded, just not GULLIBLE!
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: June 15, 2010, 01:58:20 AM »

Just because I listen to what someone has to say doesn't mean I agree with them.
Logged
fezzyfestoon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,204
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: June 15, 2010, 07:54:06 AM »

That has nothing to do with alleging that an entirely active and largely unchallenged economic theory has been "rejected".  And no professor that "advocates" one theory over the other shouldn't be in a teaching position, which is why I doubt they did.  I'm an Economics major and I have no idea what the economic leanings are of any of the many Economics professors I've had, nor any others for that matter.
Logged
Free Trade is managed by the invisible hand.
HoffmanJohn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,951
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: June 15, 2010, 08:31:33 AM »

That has nothing to do with alleging that an entirely active and largely unchallenged economic theory has been "rejected".  And no professor that "advocates" one theory over the other shouldn't be in a teaching position, which is why I doubt they did.  I'm an Economics major and I have no idea what the economic leanings are of any of the many Economics professors I've had, nor any others for that matter.

Economics seems to go beyond politics, and it is interesting how both right&left make it seem as if so many economic philosophies are diametrically opposed.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: June 15, 2010, 09:58:53 AM »

That has nothing to do with alleging that an entirely active and largely unchallenged economic theory has been "rejected".  And no professor that "advocates" one theory over the other shouldn't be in a teaching position, which is why I doubt they did.  I'm an Economics major and I have no idea what the economic leanings are of any of the many Economics professors I've had, nor any others for that matter.

Economics seems to go beyond politics, and it is interesting how both right&left make it seem as if so many economic philosophies are diametrically opposed.

I say the government has no business in the economy.
Logged
Frink
Lafayette53
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 703
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.39, S: -6.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: June 15, 2010, 12:10:44 PM »

That has nothing to do with alleging that an entirely active and largely unchallenged economic theory has been "rejected".  And no professor that "advocates" one theory over the other shouldn't be in a teaching position, which is why I doubt they did.  I'm an Economics major and I have no idea what the economic leanings are of any of the many Economics professors I've had, nor any others for that matter.

Economics seems to go beyond politics, and it is interesting how both right&left make it seem as if so many economic philosophies are diametrically opposed.

I say the government has no business in the economy.

Three centuries of economic precedent disagrees with you.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: June 15, 2010, 01:04:44 PM »

That has nothing to do with alleging that an entirely active and largely unchallenged economic theory has been "rejected".  And no professor that "advocates" one theory over the other shouldn't be in a teaching position, which is why I doubt they did.  I'm an Economics major and I have no idea what the economic leanings are of any of the many Economics professors I've had, nor any others for that matter.

Economics seems to go beyond politics, and it is interesting how both right&left make it seem as if so many economic philosophies are diametrically opposed.

I say the government has no business in the economy.

Three centuries of economic precedent disagrees with you.

Also, if you're against govt. interevention in the economy, then you would support the abolition of the Federal Reserve, correct? Because otherwise you would be a hypocrite.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: June 15, 2010, 01:20:38 PM »

I say the government has no business in the economy.

Then what does the government govern?
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: June 15, 2010, 01:23:56 PM »

I say the government has no business in the economy.

Then what does the government govern?

other things. For the record I was being a smart ass with that comment, but it's kind of hard not to be a smart ass with someone who isn't on the Adam Smith supply side of the economic theory.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: June 15, 2010, 01:26:28 PM »

I say the government has no business in the economy.

Then what does the government govern?

other things. For the record I was being a smart ass with that comment, but it's kind of hard not to be a smart ass with someone who isn't on the Adam Smith supply side of the economic theory.


Increasing supply does not generate economic prosperity. Increasing demand does. And you still haven't answered my question up above.
Logged
Free Trade is managed by the invisible hand.
HoffmanJohn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,951
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: June 15, 2010, 03:08:39 PM »

I say the government has no business in the economy.

Then what does the government govern?

other things. For the record I was being a smart ass with that comment, but it's kind of hard not to be a smart ass with someone who isn't on the Adam Smith supply side of the economic theory.

Look up the general glut controversy and tell me what you think about.
Logged
fezzyfestoon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,204
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: June 16, 2010, 12:03:55 AM »

I say the government has no business in the economy.

That's impossible.

No response to what I've said?
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: June 16, 2010, 12:12:07 AM »

I say the government has no business in the economy.

That's impossible.

No response to what I've said?

What's your question?
Logged
fezzyfestoon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,204
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: June 16, 2010, 12:19:38 AM »

I say the government has no business in the economy.
That's impossible.

No response to what I've said?
What's your question?

I didn't ask a question, I responded to your first non-response and expected an actual response.
Logged
Free Trade is managed by the invisible hand.
HoffmanJohn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,951
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: June 16, 2010, 09:23:42 AM »

In academia the Keynesian revolution came out in the 1950's with the neo-classical synthesis.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.227 seconds with 14 queries.