Richard Nixon (D) vs. Woodrow Wilson (R)

[Free Palestine]

And the Democrats would let the crook run on their ticket?

Um...

[Sewer]

And the Democrats would let the crook run on their ticket?

Um...

?

[Free Palestine]

And the Democrats would let the crook run on their ticket?

Um...

?

I just found it interesting that Libertas said the Democrats wouldn't nominate a crook...

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Yeah, I agree with Libertas here...Wilson was uber-left...

Segregating the U.S. govt. is uber-left? I'm sure FDR, Truman, JFK, LBJ, Carter, Clinton, and Obama would disagree.

LOL


I think the party of Robert Byrd is the clear choice for Mr. Wilson.

Robert Byrd and people with similar views are a very small minority in the Democratic Party. Even Byrd flip-flopped on civil rights, and the Democratic Party only forgave him because he was an institution in WV.

And? The Democratic Party is still very much the party of Woodrow Wilson. They love war, big government, progressivism, and racial supremacism.

Sure, just as the Republican Party is still very much the party of Theodore Roosevelt.

Agreed.

Yup, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush bravely carried on Bull Mose platform

Pretty much. Dubya was TR redux.

Your stupidity is astonishing me. First of all, these were diffrent times. It's just like making an ideological comparision between Oliver Cromwell and John Major.

Also, calling Bush "progressive" or even "socialist" is idiocy. In domestic policy Bush and Reagan were very conservative and only "big bad guvernment" element they used were making defense budget ridicoulosly high. Also, imperialist foreign policy is not the element used solely by some Liberals, conservatives too.

Go back to school before posting, kid.

[Bo]

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Yeah, I agree with Libertas here...Wilson was uber-left...

Segregating the U.S. govt. is uber-left? I'm sure FDR, Truman, JFK, LBJ, Carter, Clinton, and Obama would disagree.

LOL


I think the party of Robert Byrd is the clear choice for Mr. Wilson.

Robert Byrd and people with similar views are a very small minority in the Democratic Party. Even Byrd flip-flopped on civil rights, and the Democratic Party only forgave him because he was an institution in WV.

And? The Democratic Party is still very much the party of Woodrow Wilson. They love war, big government, progressivism, and racial supremacism.

Sure, just as the Republican Party is still very much the party of Theodore Roosevelt.

Agreed.

Yup, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush bravely carried on Bull Mose platform

Pretty much. Dubya was TR redux.

Your stupidity is astonishing me. First of all, these were diffrent times. It's just like making an ideological comparision between Oliver Cromwell and John Major.

Also, calling Bush "progressive" or even "socialist" is idiocy. In domestic policy Bush and Reagan were very conservative and only "big bad guvernment" element they used were making defense budget ridicoulosly high. Also, imperialist foreign policy is not the element used solely by some Liberals, conservatives too.

George W. Bush's foreign policy and domestic policies were very similar indeed to those of Theodore Roosevelt. "Different times" doesn't mean anything.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

LOL @ being insulted like this by the most immature 21-year-old I've ever come into contact with.

[Bo]

Yeah, I agree with Libertas here...Wilson was uber-left...

Segregating the U.S. govt. is uber-left? I'm sure FDR, Truman, JFK, LBJ, Carter, Clinton, and Obama would disagree.

LOL


I think the party of Robert Byrd is the clear choice for Mr. Wilson.

Robert Byrd and people with similar views are a very small minority in the Democratic Party. Even Byrd flip-flopped on civil rights, and the Democratic Party only forgave him because he was an institution in WV.

And? The Democratic Party is still very much the party of Woodrow Wilson. They love war, big government, progressivism, and racial supremacism.

Sure, just as the Republican Party is still very much the party of Theodore Roosevelt.

Agreed.

Yup, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush bravely carried on Bull Mose platform

Pretty much. Dubya was TR redux.

Your stupidity is astonishing me. First of all, these were diffrent times. It's just like making an ideological comparision between Oliver Cromwell and John Major.

Also, calling Bush "progressive" or even "socialist" is idiocy. In domestic policy Bush and Reagan were very conservative and only "big bad guvernment" element they used were making defense budget ridicoulosly high. Also, imperialist foreign policy is not the element used solely by some Liberals, conservatives too.

George W. Bush's foreign policy and domestic policies were very similar indeed to those of Theodore Roosevelt. "Different times" doesn't mean anything.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

LOL @ being insulted like this by the most immature 21-year-old I've ever come into contact with.

TR worked to help ordianry Americans--Bush Jr. worked to help the rich. There is a huge difference right there.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Yeah, I agree with Libertas here...Wilson was uber-left...

Segregating the U.S. govt. is uber-left? I'm sure FDR, Truman, JFK, LBJ, Carter, Clinton, and Obama would disagree.

LOL


I think the party of Robert Byrd is the clear choice for Mr. Wilson.

Robert Byrd and people with similar views are a very small minority in the Democratic Party. Even Byrd flip-flopped on civil rights, and the Democratic Party only forgave him because he was an institution in WV.

And? The Democratic Party is still very much the party of Woodrow Wilson. They love war, big government, progressivism, and racial supremacism.

Sure, just as the Republican Party is still very much the party of Theodore Roosevelt.

Agreed.

Yup, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush bravely carried on Bull Mose platform

Pretty much. Dubya was TR redux.

Your stupidity is astonishing me. First of all, these were diffrent times. It's just like making an ideological comparision between Oliver Cromwell and John Major.

Also, calling Bush "progressive" or even "socialist" is idiocy. In domestic policy Bush and Reagan were very conservative and only "big bad guvernment" element they used were making defense budget ridicoulosly high. Also, imperialist foreign policy is not the element used solely by some Liberals, conservatives too.

George W. Bush's foreign policy and domestic policies were very similar indeed to those of Theodore Roosevelt. "Different times" doesn't mean anything.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

LOL @ being insulted like this by the most immature 21-year-old I've ever come into contact with.

TR worked to help ordianry Americans--Bush Jr. worked to help the rich. There is a huge difference right there.

LOL

TR and Bush Jr. both worked to expand centralized government power at home while slaughtering people overseas. Those scumbags were both cut from the same cloth.

[Bo]

Yeah, I agree with Libertas here...Wilson was uber-left...

Segregating the U.S. govt. is uber-left? I'm sure FDR, Truman, JFK, LBJ, Carter, Clinton, and Obama would disagree.

LOL


I think the party of Robert Byrd is the clear choice for Mr. Wilson.

Robert Byrd and people with similar views are a very small minority in the Democratic Party. Even Byrd flip-flopped on civil rights, and the Democratic Party only forgave him because he was an institution in WV.

And? The Democratic Party is still very much the party of Woodrow Wilson. They love war, big government, progressivism, and racial supremacism.

Sure, just as the Republican Party is still very much the party of Theodore Roosevelt.

Agreed.

Yup, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush bravely carried on Bull Mose platform

Pretty much. Dubya was TR redux.

Your stupidity is astonishing me. First of all, these were diffrent times. It's just like making an ideological comparision between Oliver Cromwell and John Major.

Also, calling Bush "progressive" or even "socialist" is idiocy. In domestic policy Bush and Reagan were very conservative and only "big bad guvernment" element they used were making defense budget ridicoulosly high. Also, imperialist foreign policy is not the element used solely by some Liberals, conservatives too.

George W. Bush's foreign policy and domestic policies were very similar indeed to those of Theodore Roosevelt. "Different times" doesn't mean anything.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

LOL @ being insulted like this by the most immature 21-year-old I've ever come into contact with.

TR worked to help ordianry Americans--Bush Jr. worked to help the rich. There is a huge difference right there.

LOL

TR and Bush Jr. both worked to expand centralized government power at home while slaughtering people overseas. Those scumbags were both cut from the same cloth.

LOL right back at you, since TR expanded the role of the govt. to help ordianry people while Bush Jr. did it to scare people (wiretapping, etc.). In regards to foreign policy, TR and Bush Jr. were kinda similar but foreign adventures was much more acceptable in TR's time than in Bush Jr.'s time.