Crazy posts over at Hannity's forum

[Mint]

I'd support a Huckabee/Palin ticket anyday over Paul/whoever.  At least Huckabee loves this coutry and wants whats best for it.

Classy. Did you dust off your american flag lapel when you typed that gem out?

[Mechaman]

Furthermore, I find it disgusting that conservatives are blaming the behavior of their own radicals on us. Face it, it is the disgusting radical far right wing social conservatives who bastardized the tea party movement who are the ones who are acting like super crazies, not us. Way to blame the actions and feelings of racist wastes of sperm on us, in fact way to even go as far as claiming they are "radical libertarians"!

But then again seeing as how the only way you guys can succeed is through the use of fear and deceit, this shouldn't surprise me one bit, not one f***ing bit.

[Mechaman]

I'd support a Huckabee/Palin ticket anyday over Paul/whoever.  At least Huckabee loves this coutry and wants whats best for it.

Classy. Did you dust off your american flag lapel when you typed that gem out?

Oh yeah, because a super theocrat populist who thinks AIDS patients should be locked up in concentration camps loves America and knows what's best for it!

[Mint]

Furthermore, I find it disgusting that conservatives are blaming the behavior of their own radicals on us. Face it, it is the disgusting radical far right wing social conservatives who bastardized the tea party movement who are the ones who are acting like super crazies, not us. Way to blame the actions and feelings of racist wastes of sperm on us, in fact way to even go as far as claiming they are "radical libertarians"!

But then again seeing as how the only way you guys can succeed is through the use of fear and deceit, this shouldn't surprise me one bit, not one f***ing bit.

Pretty much. Claiming the 'Impeach the keyan' types are the majority at these protests is like saying ANSWER represented the majority of anti war protesters.

[Lief 🗽]

Guys, guys, guys: both your ideologies, libertarianism and conservatism, are stupid. No need to fight.

People like you are the reason I could never bring myself to be a liberal. That, and the fact that it's a bizarre mixed bag of restrictions and freedoms, which seem completely arbitrary. Your ideology has no unifying philosophy.

I'm not really a liberal. But absolutist ideologies are stupid anyway; some restrictions are good, some freedoms are good. An either/or outlook is impractical.

[Magic 8-Ball]

Why would anyone subject themselves to Sean Hannity's site?  It seems like an exercise in masochism.

[Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon]

I'd support a Huckabee/Palin ticket anyday over Paul/whoever.  At least Huckabee loves this coutry and wants whats best for it.

Classy. Did you dust off your american flag lapel when you typed that gem out?

Oh yeah, because a super theocrat populist who thinks AIDS patients should be locked up in concentration camps loves America and knows what's best for it!

Mike Huckabee is not a "super theocrat populist" by any definition.  He's an honest and decent man.  I've met him and have sane/moderate friends who worked on his campaign and have nothing but good things to say about him as an individual.  He has been visciously opposed by some radical-right clergy for not being extreme enough for their tastes and as a pastor was known for being from the more moderate wing of southern baptist leaders.  If you think he is a representative of the extremist social conservative viewpoint in American politics, you're out of your ever-lovin mind.

[riceowl]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Magic 8-Ball]

I'd support a Huckabee/Palin ticket anyday over Paul/whoever.  At least Huckabee loves this coutry and wants whats best for it.

Classy. Did you dust off your american flag lapel when you typed that gem out?

Oh yeah, because a super theocrat populist who thinks AIDS patients should be locked up in concentration camps loves America and knows what's best for it!

Mike Huckabee is not a "super theocrat populist" by any definition.

Sure, he is.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

That has little to do with being a "super theocrat populist".

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Who?  The ones who oppose just about every candidate with a modicum of support?  Are they the same ones who opposed W. for being too supportive of abortion?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

If you believe he isn't after watching the video I linked, you're nucking futs.

[pogo stick]

For once, I endorse the sentiments of "Palin-Huckabee 2012".  I used to think that the "religious right" social consevatives were bad.... but at least they aren't as anti-American as these ultra-libertarian nutbags.

I'd support a Huckabee/Palin ticket anyday over Paul/whoever.  At least Huckabee loves this coutry and wants whats best for it.

And Hannity is annoying and often wrong, but he's certainly within the mainstream of U.S. political thought.

I agree with the Moderate Hero.

[JSojourner]

And Hannity is annoying and often wrong, but he's certainly within the mainstream of U.S. political thought.

If this is the mainstream, we are in big trouble...

"It doesn't say anywhere in the Constitution this idea of the separation of church and state."

"He's not made one mistake in this war, not one." [on President Bush's handling of the Iraq War]

"I'll tell you who should be tortured and killed at Guantanamo: every filthy Democrat in the U.S. Congress."  Sean Hannity on Hannity & Colmes show on 6/15/05

"Anyone listening to this show that believes homosexuality is a normal lifestyle has been brainwashed. It's very dangerous if we start accepting lower and lower forms of behavior as the normal. " Hannity's first radio show at UC Santa Barbara (May 25, 1989)

[Landslide Lyndon]

And Hannity is annoying and often wrong, but he's certainly within the mainstream of U.S. political thought.

If this is the mainstream, we are in big trouble...

"It doesn't say anywhere in the Constitution this idea of the separation of church and state."

"He's not made one mistake in this war, not one." [on President Bush's handling of the Iraq War]

"I'll tell you who should be tortured and killed at Guantanamo: every filthy Democrat in the U.S. Congress."  Sean Hannity on Hannity & Colmes show on 6/15/05

"Anyone listening to this show that believes homosexuality is a normal lifestyle has been brainwashed. It's very dangerous if we start accepting lower and lower forms of behavior as the normal. " Hannity's first radio show at UC Santa Barbara (May 25, 1989)

This guy is a moralist, partisan, hypocrit thug masquerading as a "serious analyst".
But his Palinesque ignorance and mendacity turn him from a dangerous to a hilariously over the top figure.

[Хahar 🤔]

Guys, guys, guys: both your ideologies, libertarianism and conservatism, are stupid. No need to fight.

People like you are the reason I could never bring myself to be a liberal. That, and the fact that it's a bizarre mixed bag of restrictions and freedoms, which seem completely arbitrary. Your ideology has no unifying philosophy.

You're a strange one to be worried about ideological consistency.

[Free Palestine]

Guys, guys, guys: both your ideologies, libertarianism and conservatism, are stupid. No need to fight.

People like you are the reason I could never bring myself to be a liberal. That, and the fact that it's a bizarre mixed bag of restrictions and freedoms, which seem completely arbitrary. Your ideology has no unifying philosophy.

I'm not really a liberal. But absolutist ideologies are stupid anyway; some restrictions are good, some freedoms are good. An either/or outlook is impractical.

So saying conservatives and libertarians are stupid isn't absolutist?

[Lief 🗽]

Guys, guys, guys: both your ideologies, libertarianism and conservatism, are stupid. No need to fight.

People like you are the reason I could never bring myself to be a liberal. That, and the fact that it's a bizarre mixed bag of restrictions and freedoms, which seem completely arbitrary. Your ideology has no unifying philosophy.

I'm not really a liberal. But absolutist ideologies are stupid anyway; some restrictions are good, some freedoms are good. An either/or outlook is impractical.

So saying conservatives and libertarians are stupid isn't absolutist?

I said no such thing.

[Free Palestine]

Guys, guys, guys: both your ideologies, libertarianism and conservatism, are stupid. No need to fight.

People like you are the reason I could never bring myself to be a liberal. That, and the fact that it's a bizarre mixed bag of restrictions and freedoms, which seem completely arbitrary. Your ideology has no unifying philosophy.

I'm not really a liberal. But absolutist ideologies are stupid anyway; some restrictions are good, some freedoms are good. An either/or outlook is impractical.

So saying conservatives and libertarians are stupid isn't absolutist?

I said no such thing.

Guys, guys, guys: both your ideologies, libertarianism and conservatism, are stupid. No need to fight.

[Badger]

Ok, fine they are Radical conservatives. But Hannity isn't.

What is he?

A mainstream conservative.

Rush Limbaugh is also mainstream conservative, but one with ADD and mental retardation. (In case you haven't  noticed, I hate Rush, but like Hannity and Beck)

Apparantly based on trendiness as opposesed to the actual (identical) content of the garbage they each spew.

[Lief 🗽]

Guys, guys, guys: both your ideologies, libertarianism and conservatism, are stupid. No need to fight.

People like you are the reason I could never bring myself to be a liberal. That, and the fact that it's a bizarre mixed bag of restrictions and freedoms, which seem completely arbitrary. Your ideology has no unifying philosophy.

I'm not really a liberal. But absolutist ideologies are stupid anyway; some restrictions are good, some freedoms are good. An either/or outlook is impractical.

So saying conservatives and libertarians are stupid isn't absolutist?

I said no such thing.

Guys, guys, guys: both your ideologies, libertarianism and conservatism, are stupid. No need to fight.

The ideologies are stupid. Individual libertarians and conservatives aren't necessarily (though the majority, like most groups of humans probably are).

[Free Palestine]

Guys, guys, guys: both your ideologies, libertarianism and conservatism, are stupid. No need to fight.

People like you are the reason I could never bring myself to be a liberal. That, and the fact that it's a bizarre mixed bag of restrictions and freedoms, which seem completely arbitrary. Your ideology has no unifying philosophy.

I'm not really a liberal. But absolutist ideologies are stupid anyway; some restrictions are good, some freedoms are good. An either/or outlook is impractical.

So saying conservatives and libertarians are stupid isn't absolutist?

I said no such thing.

Guys, guys, guys: both your ideologies, libertarianism and conservatism, are stupid. No need to fight.

The ideologies are stupid. Individual libertarians and conservatives aren't necessarily (though the majority, like most groups of humans probably are).

Well, I probably said that wrong.  I should've said...

So calling ideologies that disagree with yours stupid isn't absolutist?

[Mechaman]

Guys, guys, guys: both your ideologies, libertarianism and conservatism, are stupid. No need to fight.

People like you are the reason I could never bring myself to be a liberal. That, and the fact that it's a bizarre mixed bag of restrictions and freedoms, which seem completely arbitrary. Your ideology has no unifying philosophy.

I'm not really a liberal. But absolutist ideologies are stupid anyway; some restrictions are good, some freedoms are good. An either/or outlook is impractical.

So saying conservatives and libertarians are stupid isn't absolutist?

I said no such thing.

Guys, guys, guys: both your ideologies, libertarianism and conservatism, are stupid. No need to fight.

The ideologies are stupid. Individual libertarians and conservatives aren't necessarily (though the majority, like most groups of humans probably are).

So by your argument "liberalism" (the American bastardized term) is also stupid since people are stupid?
Oh our does just being a "liberal" prevent one from being stupid?
Fail fail fail fail fail!!!

[Lief 🗽]

So calling ideologies that disagree with yours stupid isn't absolutist?

I'm not calling them stupid because they disagree with "my ideology," whatever that may be. I'm calling the ideologies stupid because they're just not very good. One, in its unending zeal to expand freedom, weakens and ultimately destroys the thing that provides most freedoms, while the other is a backwards ideology opposed to progress.

So by your argument "liberalism" (the American bastardized term) is also stupid since people are stupid?
Oh our does just being a "liberal" prevent one from being stupid?
Fail fail fail fail fail!!!

Er, no? I have no idea how you reached that conclusion. Try re-reading my post maybe. There are plenty of stupid liberals and socialists and social democrats and communists and whatever.

[Barack Hussian YO MAMA!!!!]

For once, I endorse the sentiments of "Palin-Huckabee 2012".  I used to think that the "religious right" social consevatives were bad.... but at least they aren't as anti-American as these ultra-libertarian nutbags.

I'd support a Huckabee/Palin ticket anyday over Paul/whoever.  At least Huckabee loves this coutry and wants whats best for it.

And Hannity is annoying and often wrong, but he's certainly within the mainstream of U.S. political thought.

I agree with the Moderate Hero.

I have a question for both don and JC why would anybody want to to be in the mainstream of political thought, let me tell you about a group that at one time was in the mainstream of political thought, they where a christian group who was very patriotic and they where opposed to people they felt represented anti Americanism.  at one time had they had tremendous political power nearly 6 million members and had chapters in all 50 states.

 I speak of course of the KKK the klu klux klan.,they targeted immigrants Jews, catholics , Chinese Americans, African Americans and  labor unions  often violently  at one time in our country's history during the second wave of the KKK in the 1920's it was socially exceptable to be a member of the KKK and it wasn't socially exceptable to be a catholic or a Jew or a Chinese or  African American. 

you shouldn't always go along long with things just because the majority of the people think its right or in the mainstream of political thought. very often the majority is wrong the majority of the German people in the 1930's supported Hitler and didn't speak out against Hitler or  the violence against the Jews at that time and it ended tragically.

generally speaking I'm very weary of any political movement that targets Minority's as the cause of society's problems.

[Mechaman]

For once, I endorse the sentiments of "Palin-Huckabee 2012".  I used to think that the "religious right" social consevatives were bad.... but at least they aren't as anti-American as these ultra-libertarian nutbags.

I'd support a Huckabee/Palin ticket anyday over Paul/whoever.  At least Huckabee loves this coutry and wants whats best for it.

And Hannity is annoying and often wrong, but he's certainly within the mainstream of U.S. political thought.

I agree with the Moderate Hero.

I have a question for both don and JC why would anybody want to to be in the mainstream of political thought, let me tell you about a group that at one time was in the mainstream of political thought, they where a christian group who was very patriotic and they where opposed to people they felt represented anti Americanism.  at one time had they had tremendous political power nearly 6 million members and had chapters in all 50 states.

 I speak of course of the KKK the klu klux klan.,they targeted immigrants Jews, catholics , Chinese Americans, African Americans and  labor unions  often violently  at one time in our country's history during the second wave of the KKK in the 1920's it was socially exceptable to be a member of the KKK and it wasn't socially exceptable to be a catholic or a Jew or a Chinese or  African American.  

you shouldn't always go along long with things just because the majority of the people think its right or in the mainstream of political thought. very often the majority is wrong the majority of the German people in the 1930's supported Hitler and didn't speak out against Hitler or  the violence against the Jews at that time and it ended tragically.

generally speaking I'm very weary of any political movement that targets Minority's as the cause of society's problems.

Alaska and Hawaii were states in the 1920's and 1930's?

Otherwise I agreewholeheartedly.