UK Share Prediction
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 11:18:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK Share Prediction
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: UK Share Prediction  (Read 2800 times)
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: April 28, 2010, 08:47:28 PM »
« edited: April 28, 2010, 08:49:33 PM by redcommander »

Conservatives 38
Lib Dems 29
Labour 22

Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: April 28, 2010, 08:49:06 PM »

Con 37% (+4% on 2005)
Lib Dem 31% (+8% on 2005)
Lab 23% (-13% on 2005)

According to the calculator that leaves the Conservatives just short of a majority with 3 seats. This factoring in Brown's disastrous gaffe, correct?

Disastrous? Really?
Well, not in the sense that it means that the Labour will do that poorly, but that certainly reflects poorly on part of Gordon.

It won't do much at all to the polls. How many people will change their votes becasue of this?

I didn't say anyone would.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: April 28, 2010, 08:51:28 PM »

Con 37% (+4% on 2005)
Lib Dem 31% (+8% on 2005)
Lab 23% (-13% on 2005)

According to the calculator that leaves the Conservatives just short of a majority with 3 seats. This factoring in Brown's disastrous gaffe, correct?

Disastrous? Really?
Well, not in the sense that it means that the Labour will do that poorly, but that certainly reflects poorly on part of Gordon.

It won't do much at all to the polls. How many people will change their votes becasue of this?

I didn't say anyone would.

Well, then, why does it matter whether the gaffe is factored in or not?
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: April 28, 2010, 10:44:10 PM »

Con 37% (+4% on 2005)
Lib Dem 31% (+8% on 2005)
Lab 23% (-13% on 2005)

According to the calculator that leaves the Conservatives just short of a majority with 3 seats. This factoring in Brown's disastrous gaffe, correct?

Disastrous? Really?
Well, not in the sense that it means that the Labour will do that poorly, but that certainly reflects poorly on part of Gordon.

It won't do much at all to the polls. How many people will change their votes becasue of this?

I didn't say anyone would.

Well, then, why does it matter whether the gaffe is factored in or not?
I wanted to see if he thought it would matter.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: April 28, 2010, 10:45:58 PM »

Con 37% (+4% on 2005)
Lib Dem 31% (+8% on 2005)
Lab 23% (-13% on 2005)

According to the calculator that leaves the Conservatives just short of a majority with 3 seats. This factoring in Brown's disastrous gaffe, correct?

Disastrous? Really?
Well, not in the sense that it means that the Labour will do that poorly, but that certainly reflects poorly on part of Gordon.

It won't do much at all to the polls. How many people will change their votes becasue of this?

I didn't say anyone would.

Well, then, why does it matter whether the gaffe is factored in or not?
I wanted to see if he thought it would matter.

Ah, I see.
Logged
Јas
Jas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,705
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: April 29, 2010, 03:19:54 AM »

Con 37% (+4% on 2005)
Lib Dem 31% (+8% on 2005)
Lab 23% (-13% on 2005)

According to the calculator that leaves the Conservatives just short of a majority with 3 seats. This factoring in Brown's disastrous gaffe, correct?

Disastrous? Really?
Well, not in the sense that it means that the Labour will do that poorly, but that certainly reflects poorly on part of Gordon.

It won't do much at all to the polls. How many people will change their votes becasue of this?

Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.217 seconds with 12 queries.