Is there a large reshuffling of HOR members after reapportionment?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 04, 2024, 03:56:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Is there a large reshuffling of HOR members after reapportionment?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is there a large reshuffling of HOR members after reapportionment?  (Read 1555 times)
Jacobtm
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,216


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 14, 2009, 09:28:18 AM »

Once the 2010 census is taken care of, and new house seats are apportioned and carved up, is there usually a particularly large number of House members losing their seats, or does incumbancy translate across county lines?
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2009, 09:40:03 AM »

First, we must distinguish between reapportionment and redistricting.

There will be several states that will gain House seats and several that will lose such seats.

Within states, lines for districts will be changed (except in states with only one Representative) to equalize populations.

Next, it is likely that in several states efforts will be made to gerrymander districts.

Second, what is your definition of "large"?
Logged
HAnnA MArin County
semocrat08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,038
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2009, 06:37:51 PM »

In terms of population, it doesn't look very good for Democrats going into the 2010 redistricting. According to 2008 population estimates, it looks as though the states that are experiencing the most population gains are red states with the exception of a few swing states. Here's a list of the states ranked by highest percentage of increases in each one along with their populations in 2000 and 2008 estimates. I used the traditional red-blue color scheme with red for states won by McCain and blue for Obama.

1) Nevada - 1,998,257                   2,600,167 (+30.12%)
2) Arizona - 5,130,632                   6,500,180 (+26.69%)
3) Utah - 2,233,169                                           2,736,424 (+22.54%)
4) Georgia - 8,186,453                                   9,685,744 (+18.31%)
5) Idaho - 1,293,953                                   1,523,816 (+17.76%)
6) Texas - 20,851,820                                   24,326,974 (+16.67%)

7) Colorado - 4,301,261           4,939,456 (+14.84%)
8. Florida - 15,982,378                                   18,328,340 (+14.68%)
9) North Carolina - 8,049,313                           9,222,414 (+14.57%)

10) South Carolina - 4,012,012   4,479,800 (+11.66%)
11) Delaware - 783,600           873,092 (+11.42%)
12) Washington - 5,894,121                           6,549,224 (+11.11%)
13) Oregon - 3,421,399                                   3,790,060 (+10.78%)
14) Virginia - 7,078,515                                   7,769,089 (+9.76%)

15) Alaska - 626,932                   686,293 (+9.47%)
16) Tennessee - 5,689,283                           6,214,888 (+9.24%)

17) New Mexico - 1,819,046           1,984,356 (+9.09%)
18) California - 33,871,648                           36,756,666 (+8.52%)

19) Wyoming - 493,782                   532,668 (+7.88%)
20) Montana - 902,195                                   967,440 (+7.23%)
21) Arkansas - 2,673,400                           2,855,390(+6.81%)
22) South Dakota - 754,844                           804,194  (+6.54%)

23) New Hampshire - 1,235,786   1,315,809 (+6.48%)
24) Maryland - 5,296,486                           5,633,597 (+6.36%)
25) Hawaii - 1,211,537                                   1,288,198 (+6.33%)
26) Minnesota - 4,919,479                           5,220,393 (+6.12%)

27) Missouri - 5,595,211           5,911,605 (+5.65%)
28) Kentucky - 4,041,769                           4,269,245 (+5.63%)
29) Oklahoma - 3,450,654                           3,642,361 (+5.56%)

30) Wisconsin - 5,363,675           5,627,967 (+4.93%)
31) Indiana - 6,080,485                                   6,376,792 (+4.87%)

32) Alabama - 4,447,100           4,661,900 (+4.83%)
33) Kansas - 2,688,418                                   2,802,134 (+4.23%)
34) Nebraska - 1,711,263                           1,783,432 (+4.22%)

35) Illinois - 12,419,293           12,901,563 (+3.88%)
36) District of Columbia - 572,059                   591,833 (+3.46%)

37) Mississippi - 2,844,658           2,938,618 (+3.30%)
38) Maine - 1,274,923                   1,316,456 (+3.26%)
39) New Jersey - 8,414,350                           8,682,661 (+3.19%)
40) Connecticut - 3,405,565                           3,501,252 (+2.81%)
41) New York - 18,976,457                           19,490,297 (+2.71%)
42) Iowa - 2,926,324                                   3,002,555 (+2.61%)
43) Massachusetts - 6,349,097                   6,497,967 (+2.34%)
44) Vermont - 608,827                                   621,270 (+2.04%)
45) Pennsylvania - 12,281,054                   12,448,279 (+1.36%)
46) Ohio - 11,353,140                                   11,485,910 (+1.17%)
47) Michigan - 9,938,444                                   10,003,422 (+0.65%)

48) West Virginia - 1,808,344   1,814,468 (+0.34%)
49) Rhode Island - 1,048,319   1,050,788 (+0.24%)
50) North Dakota - 642,200           641,481 (-0.11%)
51) Louisiana - 4,468,976                           4,410,796 (-1.30%)
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2009, 11:26:20 PM »

Wrong colors!
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2009, 12:10:30 AM »

In terms of population, it doesn't look very good for Democrats going into the 2010 redistricting. According to 2008 population estimates, it looks as though the states that are experiencing the most population gains are red states with the exception of a few swing states. Here's a list of the states ranked by highest percentage of increases in each one along with their populations in 2000 and 2008 estimates.
45) Pennsylvania - 12,281,054                   12,448,279 (+1.36%)
46) Ohio - 11,353,140                                   11,485,910 (+1.17%)
47) Michigan - 9,938,444                                   10,003,422 (+0.65%)
48) West Virginia - 1,808,344   1,814,468 (+0.34%)


Rust belt, no? Yikes.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 15, 2009, 12:30:55 AM »


I think he did that on purpose. Why I don't know cause Red hurts my eyes and reminds me of Joseph Stalin and I fine that more beffiting the Dems then our party.
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,531
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2009, 12:56:15 AM »

In terms of population, it doesn't look very good for Democrats going into the 2010 redistricting. According to 2008 population estimates, it looks as though the states that are experiencing the most population gains are red states with the exception of a few swing states. Here's a list of the states ranked by highest percentage of increases in each one along with their populations in 2000 and 2008 estimates. I used the traditional red-blue color scheme with red for states won by McCain and blue for Obama.

1) Nevada - 1,998,257                   2,600,167 (+30.12%)
2) Arizona - 5,130,632                   6,500,180 (+26.69%)
3) Utah - 2,233,169                                           2,736,424 (+22.54%)
4) Georgia - 8,186,453                                   9,685,744 (+18.31%)
5) Idaho - 1,293,953                                   1,523,816 (+17.76%)
6) Texas - 20,851,820                                   24,326,974 (+16.67%)

7) Colorado - 4,301,261           4,939,456 (+14.84%)
8. Florida - 15,982,378                                   18,328,340 (+14.68%)
9) North Carolina - 8,049,313                           9,222,414 (+14.57%)

10) South Carolina - 4,012,012   4,479,800 (+11.66%)
11) Delaware - 783,600           873,092 (+11.42%)
12) Washington - 5,894,121                           6,549,224 (+11.11%)
13) Oregon - 3,421,399                                   3,790,060 (+10.78%)
14) Virginia - 7,078,515                                   7,769,089 (+9.76%)

15) Alaska - 626,932                   686,293 (+9.47%)
16) Tennessee - 5,689,283                           6,214,888 (+9.24%)

17) New Mexico - 1,819,046           1,984,356 (+9.09%)
18) California - 33,871,648                           36,756,666 (+8.52%)

19) Wyoming - 493,782                   532,668 (+7.88%)
20) Montana - 902,195                                   967,440 (+7.23%)
21) Arkansas - 2,673,400                           2,855,390(+6.81%)
22) South Dakota - 754,844                           804,194  (+6.54%)

23) New Hampshire - 1,235,786   1,315,809 (+6.48%)
24) Maryland - 5,296,486                           5,633,597 (+6.36%)
25) Hawaii - 1,211,537                                   1,288,198 (+6.33%)
26) Minnesota - 4,919,479                           5,220,393 (+6.12%)

27) Missouri - 5,595,211           5,911,605 (+5.65%)
28) Kentucky - 4,041,769                           4,269,245 (+5.63%)
29) Oklahoma - 3,450,654                           3,642,361 (+5.56%)

30) Wisconsin - 5,363,675           5,627,967 (+4.93%)
31) Indiana - 6,080,485                                   6,376,792 (+4.87%)

32) Alabama - 4,447,100           4,661,900 (+4.83%)
33) Kansas - 2,688,418                                   2,802,134 (+4.23%)
34) Nebraska - 1,711,263                           1,783,432 (+4.22%)

35) Illinois - 12,419,293           12,901,563 (+3.88%)
36) District of Columbia - 572,059                   591,833 (+3.46%)

37) Mississippi - 2,844,658           2,938,618 (+3.30%)
38) Maine - 1,274,923                   1,316,456 (+3.26%)
39) New Jersey - 8,414,350                           8,682,661 (+3.19%)
40) Connecticut - 3,405,565                           3,501,252 (+2.81%)
41) New York - 18,976,457                           19,490,297 (+2.71%)
42) Iowa - 2,926,324                                   3,002,555 (+2.61%)
43) Massachusetts - 6,349,097                   6,497,967 (+2.34%)
44) Vermont - 608,827                                   621,270 (+2.04%)
45) Pennsylvania - 12,281,054                   12,448,279 (+1.36%)
46) Ohio - 11,353,140                                   11,485,910 (+1.17%)
47) Michigan - 9,938,444                                   10,003,422 (+0.65%)

48) West Virginia - 1,808,344   1,814,468 (+0.34%)
49) Rhode Island - 1,048,319   1,050,788 (+0.24%)
50) North Dakota - 642,200           641,481 (-0.11%)
51) Louisiana - 4,468,976                           4,410,796 (-1.30%)


Arizona, Georgia, and Texas (and South Carolina to a lesser extent) are all trending towards the Democrats so its not really that bad.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: July 15, 2009, 06:29:54 PM »

In terms of population, it doesn't look very good for Democrats going into the 2010 redistricting. According to 2008 population estimates, it looks as though the states that are experiencing the most population gains are red states with the exception of a few swing states. Here's a list of the states ranked by highest percentage of increases in each one along with their populations in 2000 and 2008 estimates. I used the traditional red-blue color scheme with red for states won by McCain and blue for Obama.

1) Nevada - 1,998,257                   2,600,167 (+30.12%)
2) Arizona - 5,130,632                   6,500,180 (+26.69%)
3) Utah - 2,233,169                                           2,736,424 (+22.54%)
4) Georgia - 8,186,453                                   9,685,744 (+18.31%)
5) Idaho - 1,293,953                                   1,523,816 (+17.76%)
6) Texas - 20,851,820                                   24,326,974 (+16.67%)

7) Colorado - 4,301,261           4,939,456 (+14.84%)
8. Florida - 15,982,378                                   18,328,340 (+14.68%)
9) North Carolina - 8,049,313                           9,222,414 (+14.57%)

10) South Carolina - 4,012,012   4,479,800 (+11.66%)
11) Delaware - 783,600           873,092 (+11.42%)
12) Washington - 5,894,121                           6,549,224 (+11.11%)
13) Oregon - 3,421,399                                   3,790,060 (+10.78%)
14) Virginia - 7,078,515                                   7,769,089 (+9.76%)

15) Alaska - 626,932                   686,293 (+9.47%)
16) Tennessee - 5,689,283                           6,214,888 (+9.24%)

17) New Mexico - 1,819,046           1,984,356 (+9.09%)
18) California - 33,871,648                           36,756,666 (+8.52%)

19) Wyoming - 493,782                   532,668 (+7.88%)
20) Montana - 902,195                                   967,440 (+7.23%)
21) Arkansas - 2,673,400                           2,855,390(+6.81%)
22) South Dakota - 754,844                           804,194  (+6.54%)

23) New Hampshire - 1,235,786   1,315,809 (+6.48%)
24) Maryland - 5,296,486                           5,633,597 (+6.36%)
25) Hawaii - 1,211,537                                   1,288,198 (+6.33%)
26) Minnesota - 4,919,479                           5,220,393 (+6.12%)

27) Missouri - 5,595,211           5,911,605 (+5.65%)
28) Kentucky - 4,041,769                           4,269,245 (+5.63%)
29) Oklahoma - 3,450,654                           3,642,361 (+5.56%)

30) Wisconsin - 5,363,675           5,627,967 (+4.93%)
31) Indiana - 6,080,485                                   6,376,792 (+4.87%)

32) Alabama - 4,447,100           4,661,900 (+4.83%)
33) Kansas - 2,688,418                                   2,802,134 (+4.23%)
34) Nebraska - 1,711,263                           1,783,432 (+4.22%)

35) Illinois - 12,419,293           12,901,563 (+3.88%)
36) District of Columbia - 572,059                   591,833 (+3.46%)

37) Mississippi - 2,844,658           2,938,618 (+3.30%)
38) Maine - 1,274,923                   1,316,456 (+3.26%)
39) New Jersey - 8,414,350                           8,682,661 (+3.19%)
40) Connecticut - 3,405,565                           3,501,252 (+2.81%)
41) New York - 18,976,457                           19,490,297 (+2.71%)
42) Iowa - 2,926,324                                   3,002,555 (+2.61%)
43) Massachusetts - 6,349,097                   6,497,967 (+2.34%)
44) Vermont - 608,827                                   621,270 (+2.04%)
45) Pennsylvania - 12,281,054                   12,448,279 (+1.36%)
46) Ohio - 11,353,140                                   11,485,910 (+1.17%)
47) Michigan - 9,938,444                                   10,003,422 (+0.65%)

48) West Virginia - 1,808,344   1,814,468 (+0.34%)
49) Rhode Island - 1,048,319   1,050,788 (+0.24%)
50) North Dakota - 642,200           641,481 (-0.11%)
51) Louisiana - 4,468,976                           4,410,796 (-1.30%)


Arizona, Georgia, and Texas (and South Carolina to a lesser extent) are all trending towards the Democrats so its not really that bad.

Yea its not like in previous years when Republicans could boast about it benefiting them most since FL, AZ, NV, and GA are not as GOP as they used to be.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.241 seconds with 10 queries.