1992: tom harkin/george mitchell vs. bush/quayle vs. perot/stockdale

Talk Elections Forum Contact | US Election Atlas Election 2024 Election Results Election Info Atlas Wiki

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? June 26, 2024, 01:51:28 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion

Election What-ifs?

Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)

1992: tom harkin/george mitchell vs. bush/quayle vs. perot/stockdale

« previous next »

Pages: [1]

Author

Topic: 1992: tom harkin/george mitchell vs. bush/quayle vs. perot/stockdale (Read 1536 times)

WalterMitty
Atlas Star

Posts: 21,572

Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread

1992: tom harkin/george mitchell vs. bush/quayle vs. perot/stockdale

« on: May 21, 2009, 06:38:25 PM »

discuss w/maps

Logged

Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon

Posts: 14,348

Re: 1992: tom harkin/george mitchell vs. bush/quayle vs. perot/stockdale

« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2009, 08:12:30 PM »

Harkin would have been a weaker candidate than was Clinton. He lacks Clinton's down home charm, his charisma, his effectiveness on the podium, and his uncanny political instincts.

Harkin fails in the south, which provides the base from which Bush is able to put together a winning combination of states to win the election in a squeaker.

Perot takes as much from Harkin as he does from Bush, and comes out with 0 electoral votes.

Bush/Quayle 270
Harkin/Mitchell 268